Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Bush: "We look at all options from an EXECUTIVE BRANCH PERSPECTIVE"
Fox News, on air interview live NOW! | 23 Mar 05 | Pres. Bush

Posted on 03/23/2005 9:37:12 AM PST by xzins

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-171 next last
To: Alia

what do you mean?


141 posted on 03/23/2005 11:23:18 AM PST by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

Comment #142 Removed by Moderator

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
Which is what he would be doing by overruling unconstitutional actions by the Court.

Can you point out for me where in the Constitution the President is empowered to overrule the judiciary?

143 posted on 03/23/2005 11:35:08 AM PST by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo
but that the AP left it out in their report.

That's why you have to love FR.
144 posted on 03/23/2005 11:35:23 AM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I think we need to understand the big picture. To the white house this is about a judiciary that is out of control. This will strengthen the resolve in the senate to change the fillibuster rule... and will help the president push through his judiciary nominations.

It's unfortunate.... but Terri is being used in this for the big picture. Maybe that was God's plan all along. Who knows.

145 posted on 03/23/2005 11:37:02 AM PST by kjam22 (What you win them by, is what you win them to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
He was intentional. He was sending a message.

That's great news. I hope he follows up with food & U.S. marshalls soon.
146 posted on 03/23/2005 11:37:37 AM PST by farmer18th (Compromising with absurdity is absurdity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: twigs

She will first chance she gets, regardless of the precident.


147 posted on 03/23/2005 11:37:59 AM PST by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

Comment #148 Removed by Moderator

To: farmer18th
< i>That's great news. I hope he follows up with food & U.S. marshalls soon.

Not going to happen. Terri will die, and be another part of the argument to change senate rules and push through conservative judges.

We have many freepers here who would die for their country in military battle. This is about one person dying at the hands of the judiciary to help change a system and nominate conservative judges. Would it be worth the death if Bush were able to nominate a couple of SC judges that overturned abortion. The big picture says ..... yes it would be worth it.

149 posted on 03/23/2005 11:41:05 AM PST by kjam22 (What you win them by, is what you win them to)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: bigeasy_70118
I'm looking up the statute, in between actually being in court. In the meantime, here's a snippet from an article:

A representative of the House Government Reform Committee was en route to Florida from Washington, D.C., late Friday morning to deliver the subpoenas. The U.S. Marshal's Service has the legal authority to enforce the subpoenas and to arrest any person who attempts to interfere with their execution or to harm or kill a subpoenaed witness or, in any other way, prevent Congress from taking their testimony.

Article Quick, who wrote this:

Congress does have subpoena power pursuant to its investigative authority. The matter that they wish to investigate sub judice, is the long term care of incapacitated adults. Being a small government kind of guy, I don't believe they have the constitutional authority to investigate that issue. However, since all meaning of the Constituiton has been obliterated, Congress was probably correct in issuing them.

Once these subpoenas were issued, they have the force of law. No one can interfere with Terri Schiavo testifying at this hearing on March 28. Judge Greer did that by ordering the feeding tube removed. And in his Order, essentially thumbing his nose at Congress.

The proper procedure in this matter would have been for Michael Schiavo to go to US Distrcit Court for the Middle District of Florida and file a motion to quash the subpoenas for the reasons I articulated above. He failed to do so, I see that Congress has little choice but to enforce the subpoena. This is done by the President of the Senate or Speaker of the House authorizing a resolution finding Greer, Michael Schiavo and the medical personnel at the hospicce who removed her feeding tube in contempt of congress. The US Attorney for the WD of Florida could then and should prosecute.

a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1366013/posts?page=123#123">Big Easy Big Easy is on the right track. The mistake he is making is that the President need not wait for congress to refer a matter out to stop a crime from being committed. A criminal prosecution starts with an indictment being filed, but the FBI or a policeman can stop the crime without there having been an indictment first.

Also, in addition to Congress' ability to refer out a contempt citation under 2 USC 192, there is another federal statute that makes it a crime to interfere with the subpoena. That is the statute referred to in the above article. I read it at the time this subpoena was issued, and it lists several different ways that the interference can occur.

Keep researching, bigeasy. Your heart is in the right place.

150 posted on 03/23/2005 11:50:42 AM PST by Defiant (Make unconstitutional rulings unconstitutional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: xzins; Land of the Irish; AskStPhilomena; thor76; broadsword; Askel5; vox_freedom; ...
President George Bush and Governor Jeb Bush asked to take Terri into protective custody. ----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 12:00 AM
Subject: Press Conferences: Coalition Calls to Save Schiavo's Life Using Police Powers

Coalition Calls Upon Bush to Save Schiavo's Life by Using Police Powers

Press Conferences in Washington and Tallahassee on March 23 at noon.

WASHINGTON, March 23 /Christian Wire Service/ -- The 11th Hour Coalition to Save Terri Schiavo's Life will hold simultaneous press conferences -- Wednesday, March 23 -- at 12 noon in Washington, D.C., and Tallahassee, Fla.

This ad hoc partnership of religious and political organizations -- which will gather in front of the White House and the Florida governor's mansion -- will call on President George W. Bush and Gov. Jeb Bush to use their executive powers to protect Terri Schiavo from starvation.

"There are two people in the United States who can save Terri Schiavo's life right now. The president of the United States and the governor of Florida have the authority to use the police services at their disposal to take Terri into protective custody, restore her food and hydration, and arrest anyone who would interfere," said Dr. Paul Schenck, executive director of the National Pro-Life Action Center on Capitol Hill. "For the sake of Terri's life, we cannot afford to wait while the courts dither over jurisdiction."

---------------------------

Details of Tallahassee Press Conference---

What: 11th Hour Coalition to Save Terri Schiavo's Life Press Conference

Where: Florida Governor's Mansion, 700 N. Adams
When: 12:00 p.m. E.T.
Map to Florida Governor's Mansion:
http://maps.yahoo.com/maps_result?ed=Dm_YJa160SzuVoDy3Xxllnu_i1N4Cwd.wWwZ_EniISG7ljPeOQMF1AAAL7LeuxlJ1Q--&name=Florida+Governor%27s+Mansion&desc=%28850%29+488-4661&csz=Tallahassee+FL&country=us&cs=10&qty=9&ds=n

---------------------------

Details of Washington DC Press Conference---

What: 11th Hour Coalition to Save Terri Schiavo's Life Press Conference
Where: Near the White House; North side of Pennsylvania Avenue; Opposite the White House gates.
When: 12:00 p.m. E.T.

Who: -- Dr. Paul Schenck, National Pro-Life Action Center on Capitol Hill
-- Stephen G. Peroutka, Esq., Face the Truth TV & Radio
-- Fr. Thomas Euteneuer, Human Life International
-- Michael A. Peroutka, Esq., Institute on the Constitution
-- Rev. Greg Cox, Faith and Action
-- Fr. Frank Pavone, Priests for Life
-- Rev. Stephen Cox, Gospel of Life Ministries
-- Rev. John Vandenberge, National Clergy Council

151 posted on 03/23/2005 11:51:21 AM PST by Robert Drobot (Da mihi virtutem contra hostes tuos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
Can you point out for me where in the Constitution the President is empowered to overrule the judiciary?

Can you point out where the Judiciary is empowered to enforce its opinions on the President?
Opinions are like the @$$#o!eS who write them.
That's why they are called "opinions."

If you would like a specific answer, refer to Federalist #78:

"[The Judiciary] may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments."

I posted an open letter to Hugh Hewitt which I copy here (with a few modifications):

The threat of Executive Nullification of Judicial Edicts is an Essential part of the separation and balance of powers. If Executive enforcement is a mere arm of Judiciary legal fiat, you have the Executive, Legislative and Judicial power invested in one Judicial Oligarchy. That is anathema to anything American.

The Court was envisioned to have the power of persuasion only. But if their pronouncements bind the Congress and President automatically, the need for persuasion is gone. PLEASE read Federalist #78. It says that "[The Judiciary] depend[s] upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments." But if the President has no choice in the matter, then the Judiciary is in place of and superior to the President and not dependent on anything. Its power as keeper of the Constitution means that Congress too is irrelevant unless it can mount a 2/3 vote, which is historically rare.

We cannot live for decades on end without a President or Congress. Hundreds of bad Court decisions tearing out America's social fabric prove that. The naked abuse of Congress as well as Terri Shiavo make it glaringly visible.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1368633/posts
152 posted on 03/23/2005 11:52:11 AM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
If you would like a specific answer, refer to Federalist #78:

The Federalist Papers do not have legal authority.

153 posted on 03/23/2005 11:57:45 AM PST by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: xzins

So, is Bush tipping his hand or bluffing?

Here is a post I made in another thread:

The Judicial Oligarchy is highly motivated and cannot afford to lose this power struggle by acceding to Congress.
One of the Bushes is certainly going to have to act by force.
Those are lose-LOSE scenarios for the Judicial Oligarchy.
The Judicial Oligarchy can give in and lose some of their absolute power.
Or the Bushes can act at the last minute and crush judicial tyrrany on a range of things including WoT.
Having one Bush governor and one President is a strong pair.
Do the judges have the will to hold out? I say yes. Too much in the pot.
Do the Bushes have the will to act?
Can't tell. But I think the Judicial Oligarchy doesn't think so.
But if they're wrong they lose all, abortion, WoT rulings etc. because this Congress won't successfully impeach. There aren't enough RINOs in the Senate.
That is Bush's ace in the hole.
Is anyone tipping their hand?
Or Terri could die and it will all be moot.

Any poker players out there?


154 posted on 03/23/2005 11:58:10 AM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
The Federalist Papers do not have legal authority.

HA! You didn't answer my question.

But the Federalist Papers do show original intent, if that matters anymore. Here's another question: If the President defies the Court, what is the Court going to do? Issue another opinion? See my point?
155 posted on 03/23/2005 12:03:41 PM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

I am suggesting that everyone email Rush, Hannity, and other talk show hosts and tell them to keep up the debate. The more the merrier.


156 posted on 03/23/2005 12:04:52 PM PST by Military family member (If pro is the opposite of con and con the opposite of pro, then the opposite of Progress is Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
But the Federalist Papers do show original intent, if that matters anymore.

On this issue, not since Marbury v. Madison.

157 posted on 03/23/2005 12:20:14 PM PST by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: xzins
NO EN BANC REHEARING AND NO MORE WASTED TIME!
The 11th Circuit has punted but it looks like they may have gotten the message - delay means Executive intervention so they've shot it to the Supremes. That's my read.
158 posted on 03/23/2005 12:25:36 PM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
On this issue, not since Marbury v. Madison.

Suggest you check Worcester v. Georgia 31 US 515 (1832) and Andrew Jackson's response.
159 posted on 03/23/2005 12:29:58 PM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Defiant

You are confusing legislative subpoenas with judicial subpoenas. They are two different animals.


160 posted on 03/23/2005 12:44:12 PM PST by bigeasy_70118
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson