Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brownback supports churches endorsing candidates
Lawrence Journal-World ^ | Mar. 23, 2005 | Dave Ranney

Posted on 03/23/2005 2:46:19 PM PST by Crackingham

Pastors or other church leaders could use their pulpits to endorse political candidates under a controversial bill backed by U.S. Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan.

Currently, if churches make endorsements they can jeopardize their tax-exempt status.

"This bill will finally lift the fear and anxiety from houses of worship that seek to speak out on issues that affect the local community and our nation," Brownback said during a recent Capitol Hill press conference.

The bill would allow pastors and ministers to endorse candidates, but churches still would be prohibited from spending money on a candidate's campaign if they want to retain their tax-exempt status.

Not yet introduced, the Senate bill is expected to mirror HR 235, the Houses of Worship Free Speech Restoration Act introduced in the House by U.S. Rep. Walter Jones, R-N.C.

"Senator Brownback has been very supportive," said Jones' press secretary, Kristen Quigley. "His staff has been meeting with our staff to see what the next best step to take is -- that step has not been decided yet."

Quigley said three similar Jones-introduced bills have failed in the past.

"The congressman feels this is going to pass this year," she said. "The concerns that have come up in the past have been addressed. The language has been fine-tuned."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Kansas
KEYWORDS: 109th; brownback; churchandstate; hr235; irs; pastor; religiousfreedom; taxes; walterjones

1 posted on 03/23/2005 2:46:21 PM PST by Crackingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Good for Brownback.


2 posted on 03/23/2005 2:47:44 PM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

This should be named the "ACLU Perpetual Litigation Act."


3 posted on 03/23/2005 2:48:11 PM PST by peyton randolph (Warning! It is illegal to fatwah a camel in all 50 states)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

More than ever, Churches need to speak out on matters political.

With Terri's life hanging in the balance and millions of babies slaughtered every year, church leaders have a moral obligation to direct their flocks for and against candidates.

Well done, senator Brownback!


4 posted on 03/23/2005 2:49:08 PM PST by Aussie Dasher (Stop Hillary - PEGGY NOONAN '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Why do we usually see the latest democratic candidate speaking from pulpits at black churches?


5 posted on 03/23/2005 2:55:39 PM PST by Kimmers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Get rid of the double standard and let Conservative Pastors speak.


6 posted on 03/23/2005 2:59:43 PM PST by SmithL (Proud Submariner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Tax status, schmax status.

Regardless of the tax status, churches should do what is right. If that means forfeiting their tax-exempt status, so be it.

Did Jesus say, "Render to Caesar what is Caesar's" unless Congress provides a way of escape?

Any church that thinks it's being "silenced" by the tax laws is actually showing a lack of faith that the Lord can and will provide for its every need even after taxes are paid.

7 posted on 03/23/2005 3:03:31 PM PST by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

No reason he should do otherwise. Prior to LBJ churches could Preach without fear of losing their 501-C-3 status.
Know one or two Preachrs yet today who preach without fear or appology. And the Black AIM churches that were so popular with Clinton and Gore never seemed to have any
problem endorsing Democrats.why should it be one sided?


8 posted on 03/23/2005 5:20:49 PM PST by StonyBurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson