What's your beef? Why not investigate ALL of it? Even without the questionable Nobel nominee's reports, there is plenty of fodder her for investigation. Or do you prefer to only show one side, like MSM? For me--and I'm sure most of us here--all of the truth is best.
Yeah, that's right, let's investigate the doctor. There's the real priority here.
I hope you think about this poor girl starving to death while you are stuffing your face at Easter dinner.
Why don't you go back under your rock over at DU with your like-minded slugs, or why don't you just simply go away.
Since Dr Hammesfahr is so controversial, why don't we simply disregard his report.
Let's instead look at what Dr. Cheshire, a Mayo clinic neurologist, had to say, after examining Terri within the past month:
http://www.sbcbaptistpress.org/bpnews.asp?ID=20441
“I believe that, within a reasonable degree of medical certainty, there is a greater likelihood that Terri is in a minimally conscious state than a persistent vegetative state,” William P. Cheshire Jr. wrote, after recently visiting Schiavo for 90 minutes and examining her medical records.
“This distinction makes an enormous difference in making ethical decisions on Terri’s behalf. If Terri is sufficiently aware of her surroundings that she can feel pleasure and suffer, if she is capable of understanding to some degree how she is being treated, then in my judgment it would be wrong to bring about her death by withdrawing food and water.”
(more at link)