To: Grampa Dave
A little more detail in it. Still, the results simply do not reflect the sort of "deal" that had to have been made in this case.
Sandy is missing out on doing lenthy hard time, and the implication is that he's deprived of his security clearance for only 3 years (which I think has to be the remainder of the period for which he was authorized anyway).
Sandy gave somebody up to the feds. Who could it be?
69 posted on
03/31/2005 5:32:24 PM PST by
muawiyah
To: muawiyah; Grampa Dave
Sandy gave somebody up to the feds. Who could it be? I would be inclined to think that he had powerful friends that were gonna go on a destroy mission even more than has already happened!
72 posted on
03/31/2005 5:37:13 PM PST by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(This tagline no longer operative....floated away in the flood of 2005 ,)
To: muawiyah; Ernest_at_the_Beach
If anyone believes that Sandy Burglar will have his clearance back in 3 years, I have several bridges in San Francisco and NYC to sell them.
GW will not leave office until Jan 2009.
84 posted on
03/31/2005 6:27:09 PM PST by
Grampa Dave
(The MSM has been a WMD, Weapon of Mass Disinformation for the Rats for at least 4 decades.)
To: muawiyah
I'll bet you dollars to donuts that there is no "give up". Sandy is just a member of the gang and isn't going to be worked over like you or I would.
118 posted on
04/01/2005 12:08:38 AM PST by
thegreatbeast
(Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
To: muawiyah
Sandy gave somebody up to the feds. Who could it be? With Lanny Breuer as his lawyer, you can forget about it being either corrupt Clinton.
134 posted on
04/01/2005 2:49:50 PM PST by
MamaLucci
(Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson