Posted on 04/01/2005 7:47:01 AM PST by marshmallow
Undeniable truth.
It had been rumored here that her husband did not allow Terri's parents to be in the room when she died. Turns out that was not true.
It can't be said to often that Terri was killed. Not only was she deprived of the feeding tube, which is not considered an "extraordinary" measure to keep patients alive, but she was deprived of water when it has been well established that she is capable of swallowing.
It was not tested, because Michael Schiavo would not permit it, but most likely she could have been kept alive by feeding her with broths and other nourishing fluids, even without the feeding tube. And that ability to swallow could probably have been further developed if Michael Schiavo had not ordered that all rehabilitation must cease and that she should never be given anything to swallow.
Actually, I think it does look like he didn't want them in the room with him when he was there.
>>>I will be glad to be in her room, even with Michael there. I want to be there. And Michael was saying, No. I dont want that. But then she died before that conflict when any further. <<<
The family (brother and sister) were not allowed in the room when Terri died, they had been asked to leave ten minutes earlier by Micheal Schiavo (through an intermediary of course). The parents were on there way over to the hospice but they did not make it in time.
A sad situation.
That is a very sad situation for all involved.
Father Pavone is the best spokesman I have seen so far regarding this case. He was on the Today show yesterday before Terri's passing and was most convincing.
I noticed this morning the Today show only had Michael Schiavo's attorney on. He said Terri's brother had to be restrained by police. There was no rebuttal guest from the Schindler family.
I wish the Today show would have asked Father Pavone as a rebuttal guest to that weasel lawyer.
How dare that nasty brother want to be at his sister's bedside when she died! Call the police! Call the police! sarcasm
I've posted this on a couple other threads:
Who Will Remember Terri?
By JAMES TARANTO
April 1, 2005; Page A10
"Joe Ford, a Harvard undergraduate with severe cerebral palsy: "Like many others with disabilities, I believe that the American public, to one degree or another, holds that disabled people are better off dead. To put it in a simpler way, many Americans are bigots. A close examination of the facts of the Schiavo case reveals not a case of difficult decisions but a basic test of this country's decency."
< It had been rumored here that her husband did not allow Terri's parents to be in the room when she died. Turns out that was not true. >
Only because they had not arrived in time. He refused the brother. I think we can make a pretty good determination that he would have said no had they been at the hospice. If he wasn't a POS before her death, he is now, just because of that. What kind of trash refuses a brother the opportunuty to be at the bedside of his sister at death? MS is just a big POS.
I agree.
I don't think judges and doctors can be relied upon to understand and follow your written orders.
Choose an agent to speak for you in the case that you are incapacitated. (You can draw up an ordered list of people to speak for you).
but, but, he had an AGENDA! He was promoting LIFE!
< Father Pavone is the best spokesman I have seen so far regarding this case. >
Agreed. I saw the exchange reprinted above. The Schindler's should keep him as a spokesman for awhile. He is very articulate without being extreme.
Felos made it sound as if Terri's mother had abandoned her. He is scum.
BTTT!
Why are you trying to confuse the issue with facts? Everyone knows that if they were there, he wouldn't have let them in - so that's the same thing as if they were trying to get in and he refused, right?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.