Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Canada: Blogger busts Adscam ban, officials thinking of charging Canadian blogger.
Ottawa Sun ^ | 04/04/05 | STEPHANIE RUBEC,

Posted on 04/04/2005 1:07:58 AM PDT by Pikamax

Blogger busts Adscam ban

Ad exec's explosive testimony posted on American website By STEPHANIE RUBEC, Parliamentary Bureau

AN AMERICAN website has breached the publication ban protecting the explosive and damning testimony of a Montreal ad exec at the Adscam inquiry. The U.S. blogger raised the ire of the Gomery commission this weekend by publishing extracts from testimony given in secret by Jean Brault on Thursday.

The American blog, being promoted by an all-news Canadian website, boasts that "Canada's Corruption Scandal Breaks Wide Open" and promises more to come. The owner of the Canadian website refused to comment yesterday.

Adscam inquiry spokesman Francois Perreault expressed shock at the publication ban breach, and said commission co-counsel Bernard Roy and Justice John Gomery will decide today whether to charge the Canadian website owner with contempt of court.

FRAUD TRIAL

"We never thought someone would violate the publication ban," Perreault said yesterday. "Maybe we were more confident than we should have been."

Gomery slapped a ban on Brault's testimony last week to ensure the Montreal ad exec would be able to find an unbiased jury for his fraud trial, which is set for next month.

Gomery also ordered a publication ban on the upcoming testimony of former sponsorship head Chuck Guite and former ad exec Paul Coffin.

But reporters and cameras have been allowed inside the hearing room as long as they don't publish Brault's testimony until the ban is lifted.

And members of the public have swarmed to the inquiry since Gomery cut off the live transmission, filling a special auditorium.

Rumours have swirled all weekend about a possible breach of the ban by American newspapers, Internet sites and television stations that are outside Gomery's reach.

Perreault warned that even if Brault's testimony has been outed by a U.S. website, it doesn't mean it is now public information in Canada.

"Anyone who takes that information and diffuses it is liable to be charged with contempt of court," Perreault said. "Anybody who reproduces it is at risk."

Sun Media lawyer Alan Shanoff said publishing the name of the blog, the Canadian news site or providing the Internet address could lead to a contempt charge.

Shanoff said American news organizations began breaching Canadian publication bans in earnest with Karla Homolka's murder trial.

'HARD TO POLICE'

"It became very clear from that case that publication bans are very hard to police," Shanoff said.

Shanoff said the Adscam breach would become more significant if Montrealers flock to the blogger's site to read Brault's testimony.

"The information, I gather, is very, very damaging and very prejudicial," he said. "If it's accessed by large numbers of people in Montreal where the trial will take place, it could have a prejudicial effect."

Brault is expected to wrap up his testimony tomorrow, when Gomery will hear arguments from lawyers as to whether he should lift the ban.

Brault's lawyer has asked a Montreal judge to delay the criminal trial until September. That decision is expected on Wednesday.

If the judge agrees, that might allay Gomery's concerns that Brault's Adscam testimony could negatively affect his fraud trial.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: adscam; canuckistan; corruption

1 posted on 04/04/2005 1:07:59 AM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

What's wrong with Canada?


2 posted on 04/04/2005 1:17:38 AM PDT by sanchez810
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sanchez810

No Free Speech in Canada! Dictatorship! US should put Canada on the list for countries violating human rights and free speech.


3 posted on 04/04/2005 1:20:43 AM PDT by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

One more for the blogosphere


4 posted on 04/04/2005 1:20:54 AM PDT by sanchez810
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Its prejudicial to the interests of Canada's corrupt Liberal establishment. But its too late to close the barn door. The horse has already bolted.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
5 posted on 04/04/2005 1:20:59 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

This is what the Communists often do, hide the unwanted information from the public. Canadian Liberals = Communists!


6 posted on 04/04/2005 1:23:04 AM PDT by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sanchez810

For those who don't know, the American blog which busted the Canadian wankers is:

http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/

Just keep scrolling for multiple entries.


7 posted on 04/04/2005 1:31:10 AM PDT by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66

Actually, here's the post which reveals the testimony, the reporting of which is a crime in Canada:

http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/004220.php


8 posted on 04/04/2005 1:34:52 AM PDT by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
More here

and here

9 posted on 04/04/2005 1:38:18 AM PDT by Allan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66
Actually, here's the post which reveals the testimony, the reporting of which is a crime in Canada:

According to 'authorities' linking to the post is a crime in Canada.

10 posted on 04/04/2005 1:40:54 AM PDT by Allan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: furquhart; Clive

Ping


11 posted on 04/04/2005 1:42:49 AM PDT by kanawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mitchell; Shermy; ARridgerunner

More


12 posted on 04/04/2005 1:42:52 AM PDT by Allan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Allan

Thanks for the links!


13 posted on 04/04/2005 1:49:00 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66
It's not a crime to post it in America:

On Thursday, Jean Brault began his testimony, subject to the publication ban, and revealed a massive pattern of corruption going to the highest levels of the Liberal party and government. Brault testified to hundreds of thousands of dollars of bogus transactions designed to benefit the Liberal Party of Canada over a period from 1994 to 2002.

Most of the illegal campaign contributions involved Brault either hiring “employees” -- who were in fact working full time on Liberal Party activities -- or paying invoices for Liberal Party campaign expenses (which were never declared as such) or making untraceable cash donations to Liberal officials. In exchange for helping the federal Liberals in Quebec, Brault received millions of dollars in federal advertising contracts.

Brault said he met with Jean Carle, a key aide to then Prime Minister Jean Chretien to propose a more direct way of ensuring that Groupaction got a large share of federal advertising dollars in Quebec. Carle referred Brault to federal bureaucrat Charles (“Chuck”) Guité and told him that “there was room for everybody.”

Guité later put together the sponsorship program, in which five Liberal connected firms -- including Groupaction -- were guaranteed a monopoly on government “sponsorship” advertising (e.g. federal advertising at sporting or cultural events) and related work. The sponsorship program eventually became a huge slush fund into which over $250 million was poured, over $100 million of which was paid in fees and commissions to these five advertising firms, with little or any evidence of work done or value for money.

In exchange for these large contracts for little or no work, Brault kicked back generously to the Liberal Party, putting Liberal organizers on his payroll while they continued to perform party work (including, at one point, Prime Minister Jean Chrétien’s brother, Gaby Chrétien), paying invoices to other companies for work actually done for the Liberal Party, and giving large donations -- in cash -- to the Liberal Party through Renaud or Liberal Party organizer (and close associate of Public Works Minister Alfonso Gagliano) Joe Morselli.

Protection Racket?

Towards the later part of the sponsorship program, the friends and associates of Public Works Minister and former ambassador to Denmark Alfonso Gagliano, some of whom have been linked to organized crime, played a larger role in the schemes.

At one point, Gagliano associate Tony Mignacca told Brault that if he didn’t rehire Renaud (who had left Groupaction to start a new company), he would lose his newly acquired contract with Via Rail -- Canada’s state-run passenger rail service. Brault broke down in tears after he recounted this testimony. At a meeting in 2001 with Joe Morselli, Brault said that he arranged to have the meeting in an overheated room in a restaurant -- so that Brault could ask Morselli to take off his coat and ensure that he wasn’t carrying a body pack.

This is just the beginning of Brault's testimony.

14 posted on 04/04/2005 1:53:48 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

The real art here is how to get this information to the average Canadian. What percentage of the Canadian population has heard about the testimony and knows where to access it, I wonder.


15 posted on 04/04/2005 2:22:22 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax; All
 According to 'authorities' linking to the post is a crime in Canada.
 Canada's Corruption Scandal Breaks Wide Open
 Canada: Banned sponsorship testimony on U.S. weblogs
 Let's see if I get charged for linking to this!!!!!
 website owner could be charged with contempt of court.
 CANADIANS TO BE CHARGED FOR 'THINKING' ABOUT GOMERY INQUIRY....
 Just heard on CBC...
 

16 posted on 04/04/2005 2:44:54 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
 Here's all the dirty laundry we couldn't hear ....and it confirms what many of us here had suspected about the Liberal funding rackets in Quebec.
http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/004220.php
 Flashback: FBI Links Alfonso Gagliano to Mob
 I would highly recommend that ALL Canadians read Captain's Quarters and Instapundit today... They have some interesting blog entries...

17 posted on 04/04/2005 4:02:36 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax; All

What should this scandal be called? GomeryGate?


18 posted on 04/04/2005 4:29:37 AM PDT by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
RE: Canada's Corruption Scandal Breaks Wide Open: I believe, over decades, Canadians have been quietly socialized to become, more complacent, government dependent, uninvolved, blind followers, towards a more leftist leaning socialist-style government/society. In fact, I believe, Canadian Conservatives are further to the left than U.S. Democrats. There are consistently, publication bans on everything of significance in Canada; this is presented under the guise of, protecting the innocent until proven guilty and/or not tainting potential evidence for pending trials. I believe, the Sponsorship Scandal "Adscam" is one scandal among many, which have been suppressed from public scrutiny in Canada. The occasional, motivated journalist, who does try to Access Information is blacklisted and ostracized. Common citizens and professionals, who fight for disclosure are similarly, blacklisted, suppressed, ostracized and/or ruined. In addition, I believe most Canadians are placated and patronized by their Government Leader's for specific benefits. I believe Canadians believe they are, so-called, more polite, courteous and possess higher, more positive morals or more considerate, caring values than most people, especially U.S. citizens. The point is, CANADIANS don't get involved because they are kept in the dark, afraid or punished, when they do express dissenting opinions. Leading news media stations/programs, in many cases, are in part or in whole, government funded; journalists and money is limited; nepotism, favouritism and protectionism is rampant in the news media business, government offices and especially public sector business. The aforementioned follow the "interpreted" rules of the day without question. BUT now, BLOGGERS have ruined the day....the truth begins to seep to the surface....and of course, disclosure is initiated from the U.S. Canadians began to question and complain about issues and the pear-heads in Canada, again, gagged disclosure. My opinion is, if you are guilty, you are guilty; the Canadian government is not interested in protecting the rule of law or civil/criminal procedure, as they represent; they are really interested in hiding the truth and hiding the process in which they have and will continue to corrupt the law and misrepresent the facts. THANK GOD for the BLOGGERS!! However, believe me, related politician's, public servants and their cronies, will desperately try to shut the bloggers up, BY ANY MEANS!! In fact, recent reports disclose this posting by me, could get me charged. go figure!!!
19 posted on 04/04/2005 5:41:41 AM PDT by Suppressed Dissenting Voice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

The bad part about this is that the focus of the story has become the breaking of the ban rather than the facts of the testimony.


20 posted on 04/04/2005 6:08:39 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Allan
According to 'authorities' linking to the post is a crime in Canada.

What about linking to this post? This post doen't contain the information. Does linking to a site that links to a site that links to a site that contains the info illegal? If so, then I would imagine that everyone on the planet who logged onto the internet today has commited a crime in these yokels eyes.

Remember the game "Six Steps to Bacon"? That's the game where you attempt to link anyone on the planet to actor Kevin Bacon in only six steps. Usually, you can do it.

21 posted on 04/04/2005 8:51:08 AM PDT by lafroste (gravity is not a force. See my profile to read my novel absolutely free (I know, beyond shameless))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
RE: "Adscam inquiry spokesman Francois Perreault expressed shock at the publication ban breach, and said commission co-counsel Bernard Roy and Justice John Gomery will decide today whether to charge the Canadian website owner with contempt of court."

This should read,

Adscam inquiry spokesman Francois Perreault expressed shock at the publication and said Canadian Liberals will need at least 5 years more years to charge the Canadian website owner with contempt of court."

22 posted on 04/04/2005 9:20:30 AM PDT by concrete is my business (lay a solid foundation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe; Mitchell; Shermy; ARridgerunner
While you're at it
don't neglect to mention
Canada's deep involvement in the oil-for-food scandal

Canada's playing in the big league now.

23 posted on 04/04/2005 10:07:48 AM PDT by Allan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Allan
Thanks for the ping/s.

Nothing but sympathy for decent Canadians, here.

24 posted on 04/04/2005 11:21:09 AM PDT by ARridgerunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: backhoe; Mitchell; Shermy; ARridgerunner
Update: From Mike Brock's blog

Gomery Considering Charging Bloggers It has been suggested to me by what is admittedly second-hand information, that Justice John Gomery will consider charging any Canadian blogger who not only provides a link to a site containing banned material, but any Canadian blogger who “names the site containing the banned material.”

25 posted on 04/04/2005 5:52:29 PM PDT by Allan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Allan
What's this aboot eh?

Attorney General files motion to speed up Chrétien's appeal

26 posted on 04/04/2005 6:20:27 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Allan

http://www.s93384901.onlinehome.us/article-FC%20is%20a%20dumping%20ground%20for%20failed%20politicos.htm

If Gomery won't resign, Chretien could take the case to his friends
Most judges on Federal Court owe jobs to Liberals

February 1, 2005

Cristin Schmitz
The Ottawa Citizen

If Jean Chretien cannot persuade Justice John Gomery to step down from the federal sponsorship scandal inquiry, the former prime minister's appeal would go to a court led by a close personal friend, where three-quarters of the judges indirectly owe their jobs to him. ...

...


27 posted on 04/04/2005 6:25:45 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

An American needs to own a website all of Canada will go to for information.


28 posted on 04/04/2005 6:29:31 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
What's this aboot, eh?

Justice Gomery
back in December
made an ill-advised decision
to allow for an interview
by a reporter for the National Post.

During the interview
he made some foolish remarks:
that Guite
(one of the defendants)
was a charming rogue,
and also joked about Chretien
having received some golf balls
as gifts
from various foreign leaders.

Chretien has taken full advantage
of this.
During his appearance
at the Gomery Commission
he arrived with a briefcase
full of golf balls
from Clinton, Bush Sr. etc
in order to heap ridicule
on the judge
who had to sit there grimly
through his performance.

(The Canadian media loved all this
and lapped it up)

Since then
Chretien
and his army of lawyers
have launched a lawsuit
to get Gomery deposed
because of his alleged bias.

A ludicrous story.

Thus all very Canadian.

29 posted on 04/04/2005 6:35:21 PM PDT by Allan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Wiz
For the record the publication ban, which is temporary as witnesses are allowed to be present during the proceedings, is to protect the human rights of the accused for a fair trial by the judiciary. This is not being held in secret, reporters are present, and the public can witness the proceedings. By delaying the publishing of the proceedings by a few weeks or months does not constitute a lack of free speech. In fact, it would be more damaging for the government for all of the testimony to be presented in a single documentary than this dribs and drabs crap they are doing right now. By the time they are done, we will be sick of it and no one will care. At this point the inquiry has already costed obscenely more than the amount lost during the embezzlement. It is disgusting.
30 posted on 04/04/2005 7:04:09 PM PDT by ted_kabuka (The CBC should have been more critical.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ted_kabuka
Your prognostications may come true but they've spent already more on the investigation more than at hand in the scandal?
31 posted on 04/04/2005 7:20:47 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: backhoe; styky; albertabound; furquhart; Pikamax; headsonpikes; Mitchell; Shermy; ARridgerunner
Further update to #25:

All the Canadian bloggers I have checked
(see, for example, Bound by Gravity)
have removed
not only any link to Captain's Quarters
but even the name of the blog itself.

They are very afraid.

32 posted on 04/05/2005 12:29:45 AM PDT by Allan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Allan; All
--more--

 UPDATE: Liberal Meltdown in Canada (absolutley devastating information)  
http://noncogent.blogspot.com/2005/04/gomery-considering-charging-bloggers.html
 Gomery Considering Charging Bloggers It has been suggested to me by what is admittedly second-hand information, that Justice John Gomery will consider charging any Canadian blogger who not only provides a link to a site containing banned material, but any Canadian blogger who “names the site containing the banned material.”
 Website owner could be charged with contempt of court. [ 1, 2 ]
 I dont think Canadians will accept this.
This is absolutley devastating information.
http://mkbraaten.blogspot.com
 Gomerygate [ 1, 2 ]
 
Blogosphere 1, Liberals 0 -- It is the borderlessness of the Internet that has made possible the release of the truth about the Liberals to the Canadian public. Yet we are still in a phase of change where the Liberals are able to harass and intimidate some Canadian blogs, such as NealeNews, into silence. At this point, it was the Americans who came to Canadians’ aid, by posting the information denied to Canadians on a number of American websites.
 Brault may have fingered Alfonso Gagliano’s links to mob

33 posted on 04/05/2005 3:59:10 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Ooooh. Thanks for posting it. I'm going to go and post it all over the Internet.

Reminds me of the French trying to lock up a journalist for blowing the whistle on some crooked leftist politicians.

34 posted on 04/05/2005 4:15:24 AM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ted_kabuka

Sorry Ted; FOR THE RECORD, this is my opinion on your information/posting: Your posting is replete with factual errors and reeks of typical naive, ignorance and is disturbingly, misleading. 1-the inquiry has not yet (as you put it) "costed obscenely more than the amount lost during the embezzlement." 2-Of course the ban will be over when less culpable witnesses or "accused" as you put it, appear, however, there is definitely no timeline on the ban being "temporary" and reports also disclose that the information ban regarding "these particular culpable witnesses" or "the accused" as you put it, could in fact be permanent, with sanitized and/or vetted press releases regarding the testimony of these particular culpable witnesses, eventually being released. 3-you imply the ban is, "to protect the human rights of the accused for a fair trial by the judiciary." I find this to be typically naive and typically liberal-minded. The inference is, "let's guarantee the so called "human rights" of the accused. So, you believe Canada is unable to prosecute an open/closed case, if some of the facts about the case have been openly disclosed to the public? You have been well conditioned...to the point you accept the premise and defend it. Furthermore, is it "Human Rights" as you say or legal, civil/criminal procedural rights? By, "delaying the publishing of the proceedings by a few weeks or months does not constitute a lack of free speech," as you write, is in fact, while taken in context, definitely a suppression of free speech, and suppression of free expression, suppression and manipulation of the news media; which will most definitely affect procedure; which gets me to the your correct assertion wherein, "..by the time they are done, we will be sick of it and no one will care;" which is perpetuated by attitudes and beliefs such as yours and as I assert, is , in part, the reason for suppression and/or information "bans". In addition, this is typical Liberal-Canada's method of operation, sanctioned by complacent, ineffective and equally corrupt Opposition Party's. The NEW Canadian Conservative Party; get real!! HOW ABOUT A REAL CONSERVATIVE PARTY FOR CANADA REPRESENTING REAL CONSERVATIVE INITIATIVES AND VALUES.
An Informed Canadian


35 posted on 04/05/2005 5:35:55 AM PDT by Suppressed Dissenting Voice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

"THE DIFFERENCE" A very sad example of how the "Liberal-Leftist" socialization of Canada has succeeded. Even "so-called" brave Canadian "bloggers" are afraid!!! Canadian "bloggers" are afraid of being sued in civil action or charged criminally for posting "Adscam" related material. International news media reports, Canadian "bloggers" have disconnected from "links" and ceased reporting "Adscam" and related stories, evidence, testimony,.....OR,....is the aforementioned an example of our represented, "Higher" morals and more diversive, polite, all inclusive, "respect-for-the-law," love-peace and understanding, value system? YES, we will continue to criticize and "blog" every behaviour by the U.S.A. but, at home, we are AFRAID....but, will continue to "blog" nice and goodie, goodie, non-provocative stories.
An Informed Canadian


36 posted on 04/10/2005 7:43:24 AM PDT by Suppressed Dissenting Voice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson