Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Berger Whitewash
WND.com ^ | 04-04-05 | Farah, Joseph

Posted on 04/04/2005 5:54:58 AM PDT by Theodore R.

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: Liz

My first gut reaction after reading your post is: (groaning) Oh No, here we go again. Gosh these guys are sooo slimy.

Thanks for the info.


41 posted on 04/04/2005 7:29:24 AM PDT by clyde260 (Public Enemy #1: Network News!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Even after the Archives burglary, Berger was slithering around Washington involved in profiting from US government business in Iraq.

Even after the burglary AND an open investigation of said burglary
being launched. If memory serves, Berger was under investigation
for over a year before the public found out about it.

42 posted on 04/04/2005 7:36:25 AM PDT by MamaLucci (Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Joseph Farah is wrong.

The two standards for justice are for DemoRats and Republicans.

Imagine the outrage if a Condi Rice or a Brent Scrowcroft would have taken documents out of the National Archives. The New York Times would run out of headline space.

43 posted on 04/04/2005 7:40:35 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Harmful Or Fatal If Swallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci
Berger was under investigation for over a year before the public found out about it.

FBI brought into the Berger case in January 2004 and we found out about it a few months later (about a year after his first pilfering--July). He committed his crimes in July, September and October 2003.

44 posted on 04/04/2005 7:45:04 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK
Would it do any good to contact the Department of Justice?

No.

45 posted on 04/04/2005 7:48:15 AM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

Bump, I have to go for now.


46 posted on 04/04/2005 7:49:43 AM PDT by clyde260 (Public Enemy #1: Network News!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Michael Savage speculated that Bush Sr. and Clinton worked this out during their Tsunami tour. Savage: Both parties in the permanent governmnet, our "benign oligarchy," protect their own by protecting each other.


47 posted on 04/04/2005 7:50:09 AM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci

.....and besides, the Archives had to reort to setting up a sting to catch Berger in the act.....


48 posted on 04/04/2005 7:51:47 AM PDT by Liz ("There is no safety for honest men except by believing all possible evil of evil men." Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

"His "punishment" would be a $10,000 fine and not being allowed to serve in a national security position in the federal government for a period of three years, which, of course, is meaningless since Republicans will be in control of the White House until 2008".....please note Mr. Berger will be allowed to potentially "serve" again in pewrhaps the next Democratic administration...whether by invitation...or having confiscated his masters' incriminations, by blackmail!!


49 posted on 04/04/2005 7:58:01 AM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Just another example of the Republicrats taking care of each other. It's like pro-wrestling, they pretend to be enemies when the cameras are on and then go out drinking.

http://www.constitutionparty.com


50 posted on 04/04/2005 8:05:33 AM PDT by Ahban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: w1andsodidwe
Which is more deserving of jail time, Lying about a stock trade or stealing secure government documents? (my emphasis)

During war time, at that!!!

51 posted on 04/04/2005 8:27:59 AM PDT by varon (Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Fortunately for Sandy, he did not commit the one unforgivable crime: uttering a racially insensitive remark.


52 posted on 04/04/2005 8:33:23 AM PDT by Sans-Culotte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
From this July, 2004 article.....

The criminal investigation of Berger began last October but only came to light this week.

Kerry Camp Accuses White House of Berger Leak

The way I read it, for the 9 months before the news of the investigation broke, Sandy the Burglar kept up business as usual.

So, although most of official Washington knew Berger was under investigation for a serious crime, he was still advising a candidate for the presidency, and, as Liz pointed out, profiting from US government business in Iraq.

There is something extremely wrong with this picture.

53 posted on 04/04/2005 8:47:28 AM PDT by MamaLucci (Mutually assured destruction keeps the Clinton administration criminals out of jail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci

Yes, he was caught in October but the FBI was brought in in January.

I am not sure most of Washington knew about the investigation. Berger knew he was being investigated, so he of course told clinton. Lindsey knew because he's the one the Archives called to say documents were missing. The reason they called him is Lindsey served as liaison between clinton and the Archives for any official (ahem) at the Archives on clinton's behalf.

Kamp Kerry most likely knew because Berger was working with them.

But I don't think most of DC knew. As to the leak, the Bush administration, contrary to the dem/media spin, most certainly did not leak it. There was no purpose to do so. It is a tried and true clintonian tactic to leak the existance of the investigation. Making it public threw a monkey wrench in quietly collecting evidence and gave them the spin of "the Bush administration is leaking" thereby diverting attention from the actual crime. Also it would help serve down the road with an attempt to say it was all "old news". I don't think it worked this time.

I agree, it is outrageous he has been able to galavant about with an aura of respectability he lost long long ago, as did the rest of that crew.


54 posted on 04/04/2005 8:58:37 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

For a long time we've seen two sets of justice. One for the Sandy Bergers and rich athletes and celebrities such as OJ and Robert Blake. And another set for us.


55 posted on 04/04/2005 9:05:14 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nightdriver

I wonder if the Fed. attorney in charge of this case was a Bush appointee or a holdover from the Clinton regime? Does anyone know?


56 posted on 04/04/2005 9:41:53 AM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

In Washington there is a system where the powerful protect each other.Since they all end up doing something wrong at one time or another the wheels keep turning.The way that Bush has been sucking up to Clinton lately is real sickening to watch.


57 posted on 04/04/2005 9:43:55 AM PDT by rdcorso (In America Criminals Have More Rights Than The Disabled.What A Disgrace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.


The repeated failures by the 9/11 Commission leadership to deal adequately with national security secrets that Berger stole and destroyed, with the Gorelick conflicts of interest, and with its catering to partisan agendas to ensure a consensus at the expense of a thorough assessment of the facts shall forever undermine the validity of the Commission's recommendations.
58 posted on 04/04/2005 9:52:51 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArtyFO
Do you think the $10,000 for the fine comes from Bubba's excess war chest slush funds?

What a coincidence, the $10,000 fine amount is the EXACT limit for tax-free "gifts."

Berger won't pay a dime, liberal contributors will.

59 posted on 04/04/2005 10:01:39 AM PDT by Henchster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Liz

I wrote Her Honor Robinson a letter. Alot of good that will do......I'll probably get a IRS tax audit next year!


60 posted on 04/04/2005 10:02:05 AM PDT by mickie (That press conference was a real disaster since it caused MRS to go straight to Greer and get a rest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson