Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cheney Opposes Retribution Against Schiavo Judges
Washington Post ^ | April 4, 2005 | Mike Allen & Brian Faler

Posted on 04/04/2005 8:06:29 AM PDT by tessalu

Vice President Cheney says he opposes revenge against judges for their refusal to prolong the life of the late Terri Schiavo, although he did not criticize House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Tex.) for declaring that they will "answer for their behavior."

Cheney was asked about the issue on Friday by the editorial board of the New York Post. He said twice that he had not seen DeLay's remarks, but the vice president said he would "have problems" with the idea of retribution against the courts. "I don't think that's appropriate," he said. "I may disagree with decisions made by judges in any one particular case. But I don't think there would be much support for the proposition that because a judge hands down a decision we don't like, that somehow we ought to go out -- there's a reason why judges get lifetime appointments."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: awiseman; cheney; cheneychick; judges; terrischiavo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 421-427 next last
To: pa mom

Judge Greer apparently did follow the law. That is what the appeals courts all ruled.

The appeals courts did not review the "facts" in the case, they just determined that Judge Greer followed the law in determining the "facts."

That law is, I believe, one that should be changed by legislative action. In life and death cases, where there is controversy, the determination of "facts" should not be at the discretion of any single individual. Rather, the facts should be determined by a jury of dispassionate, uninvolved citizens, under the customary rules of evidence.

Had this approach been followed in Terri's case, there is a strong possibility that many of the inconsistencies in the record would have been weighted differently than they were in Judge Greer's sole determination.


21 posted on 04/04/2005 8:31:07 AM PDT by LOC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tessalu

disappointed...not surprised.


22 posted on 04/04/2005 8:31:22 AM PDT by housewife101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i_dont_chat
The country is watching Florida.

and is disgusted by what they see.

23 posted on 04/04/2005 8:32:13 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nightshift; nicmarlo; floriduh voter; cyn; Ohioan from Florida; amdgmary; pc93

ping


24 posted on 04/04/2005 8:34:06 AM PDT by tutstar ( <{{--->< Impeach Judge Greer http://www.petitiononline.com/ijg520/petition.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mattdono

Great response.


25 posted on 04/04/2005 8:34:58 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: doc30
"The voters here sided with Greer."

Does that mean the voters are Nazi death cultists?

26 posted on 04/04/2005 8:37:18 AM PDT by lugsoul (Wild Turkey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pa mom

In the end, the judge even forbade Mr. Schiavo from putting Terri's feeding tube back in if he chose to do so. See the quote from the Florida Second Dictrict Court of Appeals below:

“The trial court’s decision does not give Mrs. Schiavo’s legal guardian the option of leaving the life-prolonging procedures in place. No matter who her guardian is, the guardian is required to obey the court order because the court, and not the guardian, had determined the decision that Mrs. Schiavo herself would make.”


27 posted on 04/04/2005 8:37:52 AM PDT by srweaver (Forget the Alamo...Remember Terri Schiavo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pa mom

How can you say the judges followed the law when almost every Florida Statute pertaining to guardians was violated, the ADA was violated, Greer refused to recuse himself several times and Statue 38.10 provides for recusal when requested by a party in a proceeding, and more.


Florida Statutes
http://www.flsenate.gov/Statutes/index.cfm?Mode=View%20Statutes&Submenu=1&Tab=statutes


28 posted on 04/04/2005 8:38:37 AM PDT by tutstar ( <{{--->< Impeach Judge Greer http://www.petitiononline.com/ijg520/petition.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
There is no Constitutional right to a jury trial in a State civil case.

That may not necessarily be true under the Florida Constitution. In Ohio, there is a right to a jury trial in a state civil case for all causes of action which existed in 1851.

29 posted on 04/04/2005 8:39:13 AM PDT by SedVictaCatoni (<><)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SedVictaCatoni
That may not necessarily be true under the Florida Constitution. In Ohio, there is a right to a jury trial in a state civil case for all causes of action which existed in 1851.

Any right to a jury trial in State civil matter is purely based upon State constitutions and laws. I'm guessing that Florida doesn't require juries in cases like this or that the parties waived the right to a jury trial.

30 posted on 04/04/2005 8:48:14 AM PDT by Modernman ("I'm in favor of limited government unless it limits what I want government to do."- dirtboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SedVictaCatoni

I can imagine that Judge Greer was mighty proud, when he made President Bush, and Jeb Bush, tuck tail and run. He showed the legislature of the USA to be impotent and ineffective. Yes, it looked like Judge Greer ruled the nation for a few days. This has just got to stop! If we want a government of the people, by the people, and for the people, we must fight for it. If we do not fight, we will lose our most basic freedom, the right to live!


31 posted on 04/04/2005 8:51:19 AM PDT by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: LOC1
Why was only one man, Judge Greer, the determinant of the facts in Terri's case?

Because this was handled by the Probate Court, which never has a jury. Here in Orange County, CA, only one Probate judge handles all competency hearings, which I suspect this was.

Orange County is much bigger than Pinnelas.

32 posted on 04/04/2005 8:53:06 AM PDT by NathanR (Mexico: So far from God; So close to the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tessalu

I actually cannot imagine that the Washington (*spit!*) Post accurately described this exchange with VP Cheney.

I want to see a freakin transcript.


33 posted on 04/04/2005 8:54:24 AM PDT by Judith Anne (Thank you St. Jude for favors granted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict

I'm with Delay as well! Oh, and Cheney said this before Zogby poll came out. Wonder if he will change his mind now? I can't believe these damned politicians! They live by the polls! if the poll says yes, they say yes, if the poll says no they say no! We need leaders who stand up to the polls and say yes when they say no!


34 posted on 04/04/2005 8:55:00 AM PDT by Halls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand
Apparently Cheney doesn't think judges should be held accountable. This tell me a lot about what Cheney is really like.

Of course rogue judges should be held accountable. Terri Schiavo was denied due process. We don't need a dictatorship of judges.

35 posted on 04/04/2005 8:57:29 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tutstar

Your post indicates that you believe a Florida judge is required to recuse himself upon request. That is incorrect, with good reason - do you really think it is a good idea for any litigant to be able to get a new judge just by asking?


36 posted on 04/04/2005 8:59:36 AM PDT by lugsoul (Wild Turkey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: i_dont_chat
Judge Greer DOES NOT HAVE A LIFETIME APPOINTMENT. He is elected.

Cheney isn't worried about or talking about little probate judges like Greer. He is concerned about the 11th Circuit and their ilk up to and including the Supreme Court. He is also concerned about possible fallout landing on the Bushes. Tough.

37 posted on 04/04/2005 9:00:26 AM PDT by An American In Dairyland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tessalu

I don't disagree with Cheney, but for a different reason. Perhaps it's sophistry, but to discipline Greer for his decisions in the specific case, barring "clear and compelling" evidence of corruption.

However, Greer's obstinant definace over the congressional subpoenas is actionable, as is the defiance of Whittemore and the appelate system to enforce the clear intent of the law passed by congress and signed by President Bush.

Is that clear as mud?


38 posted on 04/04/2005 9:01:32 AM PDT by MortMan (CON is the opposite of PRO. Is Congress therefore the opposite of progress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Ok everyone, stop what your doing and call Tom Delay's office and tell him we support a full investigation and Justice for Terri Schindler!

Tom Delay Congressional Phone 1-202-225-5951
Tom Delay Congressional Fax 1-202-225-5241
Tom Delay Majority Leader Phone 1-202-225-4000
Tom Delay Majority Leader Fax 1-202-225-5117


39 posted on 04/04/2005 9:08:30 AM PDT by Halls
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Polls, schmolls. Tom Delay isn't about polls, he's about doing what needs to be done. To quote President Bush on another subject, you're either with us or against us. And I hate to say it, but it looks like the White House is against us on this.


40 posted on 04/04/2005 9:12:40 AM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 421-427 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson