Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans Plan To End Cherished Political Tradition Of The Filibuster
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 4-10-2005 | Philip Sherwell

Posted on 04/09/2005 9:12:17 PM PDT by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: Lancey Howard
Rehnquist is likely to be replaced and maybe O'Conner

The third would be Ginsberg, who, IIRC has health problems.

And I have a funny feeling that the scumbags will not leave the Court until there's a scumbag President to appoint their replacements.

They might try, but ill health or a natural death can force the issue.

21 posted on 04/09/2005 9:39:23 PM PDT by El Gato (Activist Judges can twist the Constitution into anything they want ... or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: lawdude

It's a "cherished tradition" that Sheets himself helped to change. It used to be 67 votes.


22 posted on 04/09/2005 9:41:43 PM PDT by AmishDude (Join the AmishDude fan club: "You are a wise man." -- Torie; "You rock!" -- TonyRo76)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Amaury

We've never tried to block judicial appointments with only 41 votes before. Lots of Bill Clinton's judicial appointments were approved. I don't know why we would care very much if the filibuster was taken away for those. It's not doing us any good being there.


23 posted on 04/09/2005 9:43:05 PM PDT by mhx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: blam


24 posted on 04/09/2005 9:46:58 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viking2002
Liberals raped the filibuster like a Scottish farmer at the hindquarters of a Highland sheep.

You forgot the part about doing it at the edge of a cliff.

25 posted on 04/09/2005 9:47:25 PM PDT by airborne (Dear Lord, please be with my family in Iraq. Keep them close to You and safely in Your arms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam

When was the 'moving' filibuster, invented?
By that, I mean the idea that any one item could
be stopped, but other business could continue?

If the Dems want to filibuster, make them
do it the old way, by talking, like in the movie
'Mister Smith goes to Washington'.


26 posted on 04/09/2005 9:47:36 PM PDT by greasepaint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

The MSM will not tolerate this. Even if Democrats do close down the Senate, the MSM will still present Republicans as angry, Evangelical, right-wingers who are "breaking tradition" and being "partisan."
Prepare for a major fight. Not just with Democrats, but with the MSM.


27 posted on 04/09/2005 9:49:42 PM PDT by mowkeka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blurblogger
I cherish the filibuster.

I couldn't sleep last night... lying awake in bed and dreaming of... the filibuster.

I can't eat, I can't think, my work is a mess... because of... the filibuster.

28 posted on 04/09/2005 9:50:48 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NEBUCHADNEZZAR1961
I heard a little girl whisper in church today, "Daddy, are they going to take away the filibuster?"

The whole pew began to weep openly.

29 posted on 04/09/2005 9:54:00 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

"I couldn't sleep last night... lying awake in bed and dreaming of... the filibuster."


DO YOU WANT FRIES WITH THAT ?!?


Or as we used to hear as kids, "Do you want some tea and cookies for your pity party?"

LOL


30 posted on 04/09/2005 10:03:52 PM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (ATTN. MARXIST RED MSM: I RESENT your "RED STATE" switcheroo using our ELECTORAL MAP as PROPAGANDA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

In a poll of all the children in the world, the kids were asked to choose between Lassie, Christmas, Halloween, or the fillibuster.

103% chose the fillibuster as their favorite thing.


31 posted on 04/09/2005 10:07:44 PM PDT by Joe_October (Saddam supported Terrorists. Al Qaeda are Terrorists. I can't find the link.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Viking2002

Spoken like a true Viking!!:) love it...


32 posted on 04/09/2005 10:15:58 PM PDT by suzyq5558 (This space is reserved for the next round of liberal idiocy... there they go again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam

This is great news. The filibuster is a colossal waste of time and money.


33 posted on 04/09/2005 10:17:42 PM PDT by DennisR (Look around - there are countless observable clues that God exists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard; Liz; Alamo-Girl; Calpernia; bd476; Lazamataz; thoughtomator; nicmarlo; Quilla; ...
I have a funny feeling that the scumbags will not leave the Court until there's a scumbag President to appoint their replacements.

I pray that the wrath of God Himself be executed upon the workers of iniquity in high places, these rulers who rule with deceitful hearts, these who revel in evil devices, in Jesus' Name--may their evil reigns end prematurely by impeachment by the hand of the sovereign PEOPLE, One Nation, Under God!!!
34 posted on 04/09/2005 10:18:50 PM PDT by The Spirit Of Allegiance (ATTN. MARXIST RED MSM: I RESENT your "RED STATE" switcheroo using our ELECTORAL MAP as PROPAGANDA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

BTW I am in favor of filibustering (not on appoinments) because it eliminates what John Stuart Mills called the "tyranny of the majority".

How so? I know of no filibuster that has never ended. So if anything, it only delays the tyranny.


35 posted on 04/09/2005 10:19:29 PM PDT by DennisR (Look around - there are countless observable clues that God exists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: DennisR

Talk is cheap - let's SEE it! SHOW ME THE NUCLEAR OPTION!


37 posted on 04/09/2005 10:22:32 PM PDT by princess leah (\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: blam

What is it with these Brits - can't they get anything right ..??

The Republicans are not destroying the filibuster - they're just destroying the democrats' power.


38 posted on 04/09/2005 10:49:23 PM PDT by CyberAnt (President Bush: "America is the greatest nation on the face of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
"Under the rules filibusters must remain standing, cannot lean on the podium or take toilet breaks."

Mr.Sherwell is mis-informed.

The democRATs in the Senate are not doing any talking, they are just declaring that the nominations are "under filibuster" and then the Senate is going about other business.

If they applied the real rules of the filibuster, the vote would only be held up for as long as someone was up there talking.

The Senate president also could enforce that nobody leaves the chamber while the filibuster was in progress.

If they followed their own rule on filibusters, the problem would take care of itself, I guarantee you.

Could you imagine how drawn and ugly ol' Teddy Kennedy would look after a couple of days without sleep, having to remain in his seat while they filibustered?

39 posted on 04/09/2005 10:52:16 PM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard; Phocion; El Gato; Straight Vermonter
Correct me if I am wrong but I thought the idea was to eliminate filibustering ONLY on appointments? The aticle seems to imply that all filibustering will be eliminated.

BTW I am in favor of filibustering (not on appoinments) because it eliminates what John Stuart Mills called the "tyranny of the majority".


By the way, I was watching "People for the American Way" discuss their ad campaign on CSPAN the other night. They too are pushing the idea that Republicans want to eliminate the entire filibuster (that would be fine by me).

I don't subscribe to the "tyranny of the majority" idea because the so called remedy is a "tyranny of the minority". If they're both to be considered "problems" it seems clear to me that the former is preferable because in the case of the latter the only thing that changes is that you have more people being subjected to "tyranny".
40 posted on 04/09/2005 11:05:43 PM PDT by Jaysun (I must warn you, I am a black belt in bullshitsu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson