Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Iceberg(Adscam Tip of Iceberg)
Ottawa Sun ^ | Sun, April 10, 2005 | GREG WESTON

Posted on 04/10/2005 9:07:23 AM PDT by fanfan

If Adscam was the only problem Paul Martin faced, notes Greg Weston, he'd be in trouble. But things may be far, far worse than that ... By GREG WESTON -- Sun Ottawa Bureau

It is an understatement to say this week's shocking Adscam testimony from Montreal advertising executive Jean Brault was every taxpayer's horror, the sponsorship program suddenly exposed as a reeking swamp of fraud, kickbacks and money laundering, all in the name of the federal Liberal Party in Quebec.

Now for the bad news: Adscam is likely just a puddle in a far wider, deeper and dirtier cesspool of corruption involving potentially billions of dollars in government programs unrelated to the sponsorship fiasco.

***

For years, lucrative government ad contracts have been treated like so much political pork by the party in power, dispensed to loyal firms as a reward for providing "free" ad services during elections.

Systematically fleeced

Piece it all together, and taxpayers have been systematically fleeced for millions of dollars of Liberal Party election advertising.

But the ad scams don't end on election day. Investigations by the auditor general and now the Gomery inquiry point to potentially widespread bid-rigging.

It is a huge amount of money. In the same time the Liberal government squandered $250 million on the sponsorship program, over $800 million was spent on federal ad programs.

As it happened, a pile of that cash went directly into the coffers of the same Quebec ad firms involved in Adscam.

Were palms greased and favours granted? Hmmm.

***

The government also hands out billions of dollars a month in contracts for everything from military tanks to pencils.

While the auditor general found bureaucrats broke "every rule in the book" in the sponsorship scandal, evidence is emerging at the Gomery inquiry that Adscam may be only the tip of corruption in government contracting.

In one case that emerged at Gomery this week, Groupaction president Brault described how a $100,000 bribe got the firm over $5 million in contracts with the federal Justice Department.

According to the AG, in 1998, Justice officials were not happy with work being done by Groupaction and wanted to re-tender the contract. The retendering process began, but suddenly "was halted without explanation, and Groupaction was retained until mid-2002" after getting another $5.4 million in contracts.

What really happened, according to Brault, was he had asked Liberal Party bagman Joe Morselli to see if anything could be done to help Groupaction keep the contract in 1999. The two men met one day in Montreal, Brault testified, and Morselli told him: "$100,000 and your problem is solved."

Brault said he slipped the first $50,000 to Morselli at a spaghetti dinner, and never got around to paying the second instalment before the sponsorship scandal erupted in 2002.

***

Over $1 billion has been thrown at the largely useless registry, four times the total amount wasted on the entire sponsorship program. To date, no one knows how much of that money was pilfered, laundered, or otherwise made to vanish in shady deals.

In one case, a Sun investigation almost two years ago revealed Groupaction billed the feds hundreds of thousands of dollars for gun registry work that no one seems to remember being done. The firm is now facing criminal charges related to those contracts.

***

The government hires thousands of private contractors for a vast array of services, at a cost of billions of dollars a year. There is now evidence some of them may have been victims of a systematic shakedown by Liberal operatives.

A year ago, we reported a case of one public relations executive caught in a shakedown by one of the Liberal ad firms now implicated in the sponsorship scandal. On Friday, the case became part of the Gomery inquiry.

Ad exec Jean Lambert testified that his spouse, Sylvie Cloutier, had won a competitive bid for a $200,000 Health Canada contract in 1994. Instead, she was forced to run the work through Lafleur Communications, a firm now at the centre of Adscam.

The Gomery commission was told Cloutier was forced to pay Lafleur $50,000 to do nothing but pass along her invoices to the government.

***

None of these potential scum ponds of corruption -- advertising, contracting, the gun registry, shakedowns -- had anything to do with the sponsorship program.

Worse, they were business as usual in the Chretien government -- a government in which Paul Martin was finance minister for eight years.

Martin can now try to run from the Adscam mess, but he cannot hide from the rest of the government he helped to run.


TOPICS: Canada; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: adscam; canada; corruptdems; elections; liberals; paulmartin; scandals
Liberals are GOING DOWN!
1 posted on 04/10/2005 9:07:24 AM PDT by fanfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: eureka!; GMMAC; conniew; JudyinCanada; -YYZ-; backhoe; Grig; headsonpikes; ...
PING!

Please let me know if you want on/off the Adscam ping list.

2 posted on 04/10/2005 9:09:12 AM PDT by fanfan (" The liberal party is not corrupt " Prime Minister Paul Martin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan
The massive bribery here is part of standard operating procedure in countries run by socialist political parties (remember the Clinton regime).

Socialist seize and worship power over ever miniscule aspect of human lives.

Power corrupts.

Socialist power corrupts absolutely.

3 posted on 04/10/2005 9:18:00 AM PDT by FormerACLUmember (Honoring Saint Jude's assistance every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
Power corrupts.

Socialist power corrupts absolutely.

You are so right.

We ARE going to take our country back from these thieves!

4 posted on 04/10/2005 9:36:21 AM PDT by fanfan (" The liberal party is not corrupt " Prime Minister Paul Martin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fanfan
I asked in a post here on FR months and months ago where that billion dollars for the registry went. That was maybe a 50 million project at MAX!

A billion dollars for gun registry program, some computers, databases and software, was a ridiculous premise from the start!

Guess we know where it went now. Straight into Liberal pockets. Go figure. Libs are the same the world over: liars, cheats and thieves with no morals, scruples or honor.

I shudder to think of the corruption that goes on in that socialized health system of theirs or the Liberals electioneering.

I'll bet that the reason that Canada has no military is that the Liberals have stolen enough over the years to have funded it so it came down to a choice between a viable military or Liberal corruption and the corruption won out.

OH WAIT!! THIS IS MORALLY SUPERIOR CANADA WE'RE TALKING ABOUT! THEY CAN'T BE CORRUPT, BY DEFINITION!!!

What hypocrites!

5 posted on 04/10/2005 9:41:34 AM PDT by America's Resolve (Liberals are liars, cheats and thieves with no morals, ethics or honor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan
Add me to your adscam list please? Gonna be fun to watch the Liberals in Canada roast slowly. Assuming of course that anything at all comes of this.

I'm afraid this won't mean a thing to change the average canadian's minds: they'll still vote the scum in under other names.

6 posted on 04/10/2005 9:43:36 AM PDT by America's Resolve (Liberals are liars, cheats and thieves with no morals, ethics or honor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fanfan
Brault said he slipped the first $50,000 to Morselli at a spaghetti dinner, and never got around to paying the second instalment before the sponsorship scandal erupted in 2002.

Can anybody refresh my memory? How was this scandal first brought to light? So much stuff comes back to a google query that it's hard to get down to the origin. Was it revealed by a newspaper investigation? Testimony that came out during a trial of an unrelated matter? Disclosed by a government investigation or official? By a whistleblower? Or something else?

7 posted on 04/10/2005 9:58:42 AM PDT by Zeppo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

Thanks for the ping. Saw some of CBC's morning show, of course they said nothing about this.

Well I do like Coronation Street!!


8 posted on 04/10/2005 10:04:08 AM PDT by Springman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: America's Resolve
Add me to your adscam list please?

Consider yourself added. :-)

9 posted on 04/10/2005 10:07:27 AM PDT by fanfan (" The liberal party is not corrupt " Prime Minister Paul Martin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Zeppo
Can anybody refresh my memory? How was this scandal first brought to light? So much stuff comes back to a google query that it's hard to get down to the origin. Was it revealed by a newspaper investigation? Testimony that came out during a trial of an unrelated matter? Disclosed by a government investigation or official? By a whistleblower? Or something else?

It started with a report tabled by our federal Auditor General Sheila Fraser....Her report, (2002 I think) said the Liberals had 'broken every rule in the book"

10 posted on 04/10/2005 10:11:07 AM PDT by fanfan (" The liberal party is not corrupt " Prime Minister Paul Martin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fanfan


Tough Call: maybe electoral fear,
but just as likely struck by lightening?

11 posted on 04/10/2005 10:21:12 AM PDT by GMMAC (lots of terror cells in Canada - I'll be waving my US flag when the Marines arrive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC
That's Funny GMMAC.

I had almost forgotten that our pro-abortion, pro-gay marriage Prime Minister is a catholic.

Barf!

12 posted on 04/10/2005 10:27:40 AM PDT by fanfan (" The liberal party is not corrupt " Prime Minister Paul Martin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: fanfan

Hmmmm ... seemingly that would make two of you!


13 posted on 04/10/2005 11:07:31 AM PDT by GMMAC (lots of terror cells in Canada - I'll be waving my US flag when the Marines arrive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: All
From our Canadian sister site:

  ADSCAM -- Canada's Corruption Scandal Breaks Wide Open
[ Goto pageGoto page: 1, 2 ]

-and from us:

ADSCAM -- Canada's Corruption Scandal Breaks Wide Open



14 posted on 04/10/2005 12:34:41 PM PDT by backhoe (Just an Undocumented Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the trackball into the Sunset...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Springman

Thanks for the ping. Saw some of CBC's morning show, of course they said nothing about this.

Well I do like Coronation Street!!

The Corrie episodes are a few months behind. CBC can't even show Britsih Soap Opera's properly.


15 posted on 04/10/2005 5:12:46 PM PDT by rasblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: America's Resolve

Guys, I don't think Ad-Scam is enough to sway the Great Toronto Area into voting out the LIberals. Seriously. Not even red-handed sodomy could root out Liberal support in Toronto. We need Toronto, or at least the "905 surrounding area code" suburbs if we have a hope of winning. The suburbs and rural areas west of Ontario are ours. Even suburban Vancouver is Conservative, while urban Vancouver is Marxist NDP but not a lost cause. (BC politics is schitzophrenic)
We need to beat the Liberals, but how?


16 posted on 04/10/2005 5:17:23 PM PDT by rasblue (What would Barry Goldwater do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rasblue

10 or 11 months behind. Good show anyways.


17 posted on 04/10/2005 7:34:19 PM PDT by Springman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rasblue
"Not even red-handed sodomy could root out Liberal support in Toronto."

Especially given that Liberal policies favoring "red-handed sodomy" continue to largely form the basis for their support in some parts of Toronto - LOL!

Seriously, the CPC should rightly look to pertinent historical precedent:
In 1974, the then minority Liberals were widely despised. Stanfield waited to pull the electoral plug, then played the perfect gentleman by conducting a consistently "high road" campaign which resulted in 5 more years of Trudeau and, ultimately, his imposition of his vile Charter.

Lesson(s): Liberals are amoral sociopathic scum who will tell any lie and stoop to any under-handed tactic to cling to power. Accordingly, they must always be kicked while they're down and can only be beaten by out-playing them at their own dirty games and tricks.

Not that I'm among his admirers but, Mulroney sure proved as much in '84 and - to a somewhat lesser extent - in '88.
18 posted on 04/11/2005 6:30:14 AM PDT by GMMAC (lots of terror cells in Canada - I'll be waving my US flag when the Marines arrive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson