Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Einstein may have got the theory of relativity wrong
THE GUARDIAN ^ | 4/12/05

Posted on 04/11/2005 10:16:58 PM PDT by bloggodocio

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: philetus

In order to discover God's laws, you must go to the source. Many physicists are not qualified.


21 posted on 04/12/2005 12:58:45 AM PDT by carumba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

E=MC Hawking


22 posted on 04/12/2005 3:05:30 AM PDT by Iwentsouth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Ping.


23 posted on 04/12/2005 3:35:11 AM PDT by Junior (FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper

This is not going to help his arguments any. According to this article, the speed of light at the beginning of the universe was 300,092,250 meters per second vice its current speed of 299,792,458 meters per second. In other words, it doesn't vary by the orders of magnitude Setterfield claims.


24 posted on 04/12/2005 3:42:22 AM PDT by Junior (FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
Science Ping! An elite subset of the Evolution list.
See list's description in my freeper homepage. Then FReepmail to be added/dropped.

25 posted on 04/12/2005 4:09:47 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: benjaminjjones
Thanks for ruining my day. I know have that stupid song stuck in my head. It should be mc=$2
26 posted on 04/12/2005 6:31:48 AM PDT by Andy from Beaverton (I only vote Republican to stop the Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: All
Related thread, same topic, different article: Sacred constant might be changing.
27 posted on 04/12/2005 7:37:05 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: Nathaniel Fischer
Are we supposted to get an accurate critique of Einstein from a paper that doesn't know that the past participle of "get" is "gotten"?

It's a difference between Brit and Yank English.

29 posted on 04/12/2005 8:16:43 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bloggodocio
Einstein's burst of creativity in 1905

He was 25.

Physics is like pro sports that way.

30 posted on 04/12/2005 8:16:51 AM PDT by RightWhale (50 trillion sovereign cells working together in relative harmony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bloggodocio
See: http://www.mrti-usa.com/fine_structure.htm

and: http://www.mrti-usa.com/argand_diagram.htm

from the Summer of 2001.

31 posted on 04/12/2005 8:25:50 AM PDT by Thom Pain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Thanks for the ping!


32 posted on 04/12/2005 8:39:52 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

So, was Einstein a poor celebrity or a poor scientist, because he was certainly both.


33 posted on 04/12/2005 8:47:57 AM PDT by sharktrager (The masses will trade liberty for a more quiet life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: datura
Celebrities make notoriously bad scientists as well.

Does that mean that Al Gore's Earth In The Balance is not good science? Well, maybe now that he has lost some of his celebrity he can write an update with better science.

34 posted on 04/12/2005 9:59:01 AM PDT by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sharktrager

There was a good study that said after geniuses meet success, they quickly lose some talent. Apparently money and women - or one wife - makes them softheaded and somewhat less dedicated to work. I don't know if Einstein fit the pattern, but I bet maybe he wasn't a true celebrity until after he helped blow the world up with nukes... hence he may have been both genius and celebrity, but not at the same time!


35 posted on 04/12/2005 1:33:06 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson