Skip to comments.
How Einstein may have got the theory of relativity wrong
THE GUARDIAN ^
| 4/12/05
Posted on 04/11/2005 10:16:58 PM PDT by bloggodocio
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
To: philetus
In order to discover God's laws, you must go to the source. Many physicists are not qualified.
21
posted on
04/12/2005 12:58:45 AM PDT
by
carumba
To: SteveMcKing
To: PatrickHenry
23
posted on
04/12/2005 3:35:11 AM PDT
by
Junior
(FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
To: LiteKeeper
This is not going to help his arguments any. According to this article, the speed of light at the beginning of the universe was 300,092,250 meters per second vice its current speed of 299,792,458 meters per second. In other words, it doesn't vary by the orders of magnitude Setterfield claims.
24
posted on
04/12/2005 3:42:22 AM PDT
by
Junior
(FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC)
To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
Science Ping! |
An elite subset of the Evolution list. |
See list's description in my freeper homepage. Then FReepmail to be added/dropped. |
|
|
|
25
posted on
04/12/2005 4:09:47 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
To: benjaminjjones
Thanks for ruining my day. I know have that stupid song stuck in my head. It should be mc=$2
26
posted on
04/12/2005 6:31:48 AM PDT
by
Andy from Beaverton
(I only vote Republican to stop the Democrats)
To: All
27
posted on
04/12/2005 7:37:05 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
Comment #28 Removed by Moderator
To: Nathaniel Fischer
Are we supposted to get an accurate critique of Einstein from a paper that doesn't know that the past participle of "get" is "gotten"?It's a difference between Brit and Yank English.
To: bloggodocio
Einstein's burst of creativity in 1905 He was 25.
Physics is like pro sports that way.
30
posted on
04/12/2005 8:16:51 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(50 trillion sovereign cells working together in relative harmony)
To: bloggodocio
See: http://www.mrti-usa.com/fine_structure.htm
and: http://www.mrti-usa.com/argand_diagram.htm
from the Summer of 2001.
To: PatrickHenry
To: SteveMcKing
So, was Einstein a poor celebrity or a poor scientist, because he was certainly both.
33
posted on
04/12/2005 8:47:57 AM PDT
by
sharktrager
(The masses will trade liberty for a more quiet life.)
To: datura
Celebrities make notoriously bad scientists as well. Does that mean that Al Gore's Earth In The Balance is not good science? Well, maybe now that he has lost some of his celebrity he can write an update with better science.
34
posted on
04/12/2005 9:59:01 AM PDT
by
mc5cents
To: sharktrager
There was a good study that said after geniuses meet success, they quickly lose some talent. Apparently money and women - or one wife - makes them softheaded and somewhat less dedicated to work. I don't know if Einstein fit the pattern, but I bet maybe he wasn't a true celebrity until after he helped blow the world up with nukes... hence he may have been both genius and celebrity, but not at the same time!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson