To: NYer
People that marry horses should be next.
To: HereInTheHeartland
People that marry horses should be next.
Do they really have to marry them?
...
On the other hand, if they both love each other...
30 posted on
04/13/2005 6:14:03 AM PDT by
chukcha
To: HereInTheHeartland
People that marry horses should be next. Here we go with the old slippery slope argument. Just because people are lobbying to marry their dogs doesn't mean they will want to marry their horses. There's a distinct difference between dogs and horses. Dogs are part of the family. Horses are work animals.
Shalom.
61 posted on
04/13/2005 7:01:01 AM PDT by
ArGee
(Why do we let the abnormal tell us what's normal?)
To: HereInTheHeartland
People that marry horses should be next.
You mean Catherine the Great could have been the first Russian ELCA minister?
To: HereInTheHeartland
People that marry horses should be next.
Well, then, maybe the path will be cleared so I can marry my Playstation. B-D /sarcasm>
I know my Church is ELCA so I have to see if it would follow the Synod's ruling or not, according to some, each Church is different. Since my job requires me to work on Sunday most of the time, I really can't attend much and Sunday is the only day but I think I might have to start looking for a Missouri or Wisconsin Synod Church. You know what, if homosexuals want to form their own church or religion, just break away and go on your own. I have nothing agains them going to services as long as they hear the message and hopefully it will rub off on them to make them change, but if they won't, they should just break off and leave us alone.
119 posted on
04/13/2005 10:21:56 AM PDT by
Nowhere Man
(Lutheran, Conservative, Neo-Victorian/Edwardian - Any Questions?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson