Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Four South Windsor students sent home for anti-gay T-shirts
AP ^ | 4/16/05

Posted on 04/18/2005 10:12:48 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks

SOUTH WINDSOR, Conn. -- Four South Windsor high school students were sent home Friday after T-shirts they wore bearing anti-gay slogans caused disturbances, students and school officials said.

The boys, who wore white T-shirts with the statement, "Adam and Eve, Not Adam and Steve," say their constitutional right to free speech was violated.

"We were just voicing our opinions," said Steven Vendetta, who made the T-shirts with his friends, Kyle Shinfield, David Grimaldi and another student who was not identified by the Journal Inquirer of Manchester. "We didn't tell other people to think what we're thinking. We just told them what we think."

Other students say they felt threatened by the shirts, which also quoted Bible verses pertaining to homosexuality.

...

Vendetta said the idea for the T-shirts was in response to an annual Day of Silence earlier this week. The project was organized by the national Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network.

... Vendetta and his friends, who oppose civil unions, wanted to make their feelings known. The state House of Representatives passed a civil unions bill on Wednesday.

"We felt if they could voice their opinions for it, we could voice our opinion against it," he said. "There is another side to this debate, and we're representing it."

(Excerpt) Read more at stamfordadvocate.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: aclulist; educationnews; homosexualagenda; lavendermafia; students; tshirt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

1 posted on 04/18/2005 10:12:49 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; EdReform; scripter; DBeers
Other students say they felt threatened by the shirts, which also quoted Bible verses pertaining to homosexuality.

Yes Virginia, the Bible is a threat to all liberal mindless peoples...it's in direct conflict with their religion. i.e. Moral Relativism.

2 posted on 04/18/2005 10:15:59 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks (WARNING: EXPOSURE TO THE SON MAY PREVENT BURNING.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks

Would someone tell me what was wrong with these shirts....I am proud to say my boys would have been wearing them and if the schools had a problem with that...they could talk to my lawyer...schools always back down when you mention lawyer


3 posted on 04/18/2005 10:16:06 AM PDT by Kimmers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lil'freeper

One town over from where I grew up.


4 posted on 04/18/2005 10:16:13 AM PDT by big'ol_freeper ("Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought." Pope JPII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
"We felt if they could voice their opinions for it, we could voice our opinion against it," he said.

I'm sorry, but expressing such thoughts in a free and open manner is strictly verboten!

5 posted on 04/18/2005 10:18:40 AM PDT by FormerLib (Kosova: "land stolen from Serbs and given to terrorist killers in a futile attempt to appease them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks

Gotta love it, turning the left's traditional tools against them. If they get a good lawyer, they're going to end up owning that school district.

This is deserved and not frivolous.


6 posted on 04/18/2005 10:20:26 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; I_Love_My_Husband; ...

Homosexual Agenda Ping.

Yup, free speech for me but not for thee. There is no such thing as moral relativism; there are those who see the truth and understand what is right and what is wrong, and there are those who see it inside out/upside down. The so-called moral relativists are more fanatic, more intolerant and more absolutist than any theist.

They want us to shut up and bend over and take it.

I loathe their philosophy, methods, and practices, and I will not shut up.

Let me and DirtyHarryY2K know if you want on/off this pinglist.


7 posted on 04/18/2005 10:21:20 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Resisting evil is our duty or we are as responsible as those promoting it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
the T-shirts [were] in response to an annual Day of Silence

What's the problem? I can't think of anything more "silent" than a T-shirt.

8 posted on 04/18/2005 10:22:23 AM PDT by Redcloak (But what do I know? I'm just a right-wing nut in his PJs whackin' on a keyboard..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
Other students say they felt threatened by the shirts,

Yeah. 18 ounces of 100% cotton cloth is terrifying.

9 posted on 04/18/2005 10:22:55 AM PDT by Skooz (Host organism for the State parasite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper

Ever skate at the ice rink on rt 5 in South Windsor?


10 posted on 04/18/2005 10:23:29 AM PDT by Fierce Allegiance (MIF = the Mexican Invasion Force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks

I'm a thespian, and I have no problem with the t-shirts.


11 posted on 04/18/2005 10:23:36 AM PDT by LIConFem (Mein Luftkissenboot ist mit Aalen voll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
The boys ... say their constitutional right to free speech was violated.

They can wear the shirts (just not on school grounds). Their constitutional right to free speech was not violated.

12 posted on 04/18/2005 10:24:37 AM PDT by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fierce Allegiance

Yup. Sure did.


13 posted on 04/18/2005 10:25:32 AM PDT by big'ol_freeper ("Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought." Pope JPII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks; All; EdReform; DirtyHarryY2K

Bump for fighting leftist intollerance of opposition!


14 posted on 04/18/2005 10:25:46 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: big'ol_freeper

I didn't, just thought I'd ask.

I did race BMX there many many times, though.


15 posted on 04/18/2005 10:27:14 AM PDT by Fierce Allegiance (MIF = the Mexican Invasion Force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
If schools are going to allow the gay-straight alliance groups, ribbons, or any other expressions that are pro-homosexual in nature, then they must allow the open expression of those who do not agree with the homosexual lifestyle.

The t-shirts these kids wore are not threatening at all, but it seems the left always cries "I felt threatened" as a means of getting attention and stopping those from practicing their Constitutional right to free speech.

16 posted on 04/18/2005 10:28:36 AM PDT by SaveTheChief (Oskee Wow Wow Illinois)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks

My favorite T-Shirt slogan was with the Trix Cereal rabbit; Silly faggot, dix are for chix.


17 posted on 04/18/2005 10:28:44 AM PDT by stevio (Let Freedom Ring!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks

Vendetta said the idea for the T-shirts was in response to an annual Day of Silence earlier this week.

What the F*** is this?


18 posted on 04/18/2005 10:28:45 AM PDT by Crookie Monster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks

Adam and Steve!


19 posted on 04/18/2005 10:29:25 AM PDT by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
They can wear the shirts (just not on school grounds). Their constitutional right to free speech was not violated.

Arbitrary application to what might be considered a threat is in violation to free speech. Even the dumbest knuckle dragging Liberaltarian knows that.

20 posted on 04/18/2005 10:31:14 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks (WARNING: EXPOSURE TO THE SON MAY PREVENT BURNING.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson