these scum are nothing more than Oxygen Thieves...
Posted on 04/18/2005 7:18:59 PM PDT by FreeManDC
On April 6 the New York Times published the article, “Sweden Boldly Exposes a Secret Side of Women's Lives.” That article included this description of domestic abusers by Gudrun Schyman: “It’s every man and in every class of society.”
The article did not provide a shred of evidence to support that slanderous statement, nor did reporter Lizette Alvarez challenge or dispute the comment.
Last week RADAR issued an Alert to contact the Times to request a retraction of that article.
Hundreds, maybe thousands, of e-mails, letters, and telephone calls went out to the Times. But public editor Mr. Okrent did not respond. Publishing a one-sided and contemptuous article, and then ignoring legitimate concerns, is journalistic arrogance.
It also makes a mockery of the claim in the NYT’s own Ethical Journalism Guidebook that their “fundamental purpose is to protect the impartiality and neutrality of The Times.”
Because the Times sits at the hub of a vast media empire, and because Lizette Alvarez’ article was so biased and hateful, RADAR has decided to continue and INTENSIFY our campaign.
This week, we’re going to send a message that the New York Times won’t be able to ignore. SO THIS TIME, WE’RE GOING TO TURN UP THE VOLUME.
Here’s this week’s Game Plan:
On Tuesday, telephone the Times at 212-556-7652. That’s the phone number of the NYT public editor, Daniel Okrent. The system will limit your comments to 30 seconds. So just call back a second or third time, if necessary.
On Wednesday, send the editors an e-mail: public@nytimes.com [public-at-nytimes.com].
On Thursday, send off a Letter to the Editor: Letters to the Editor New York Times 229 West 43rd Street New York, NY 10036 E-mail: letters@nytimes.com [letters-at-nytimes.com] Fax: 212-556-3622
And don’t forget RADAR’s protest of the New York Times on Saturday, April 30 at the White House Correspondents Dinner at the Washington Hilton, 1919 Connecticut Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20009. 4:00 – 8:00pm. More information about the protest will be posted on the RADAR website.
If we’re not outraged by this article, then what is the point of outrage?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/06/international/europe/06letter.html?pagewanted=2&8hpib
LETTER FROM EUROPE Sweden Boldly Exposes a Secret Side of Women's Lives
By Lizette Alvarez April 6, 2005
Stockholm - Full-throated feminism and its offspring, gender equality, have never gone out of vogue in Sweden.
Feminists here are seldom hectored about quashing family values or derided, at least publicly, as a gang of castration-happy women. Relentlessly, they have pushed for women's rights, and their triumphs are well known. Sweden ranks at the top (or near it) in the number of women who hold public office, serve as cabinet ministers, graduate from college and hold jobs. Mothers are granted long maternity leaves and send their children to excellent day care centers.
If anything, the movement is gaining strength: Sweden is expected later this year to create its first feminist political party, which could court as many as 1 in 5 voters, a recent opinion poll indicated.
But there is one significant blot on the record of women's empowerment here: domestic violence, a crime that until recently remained muffled in shame.
Swedish men are not any more violent toward women than the men of most other Western European countries. It has simply been easier for them to get away with violence against wives and girlfriends, experts and politicians said, and harder for women to get the help they need.
In an unforeseen twist, Sweden's well-guarded sense of privacy and its leadership on women's rights served for many years to mute the issue. Rather than boldly tackle the pattern of violence, many in Sweden reflexively dismissed it as the sort of thing that happens somewhere else.
"The equality thing put a wet blanket over the issue," said Eva Hassel Calais, assistant to the chairwoman of the National Organization for Women's Shelters in Sweden.
But this is changing.
It took a stinging Amnesty International report and startling admissions by well-known victims to set off a national reckoning that began last year. That has been followed by calls for action, not for new laws - Sweden has passed a series of tough, progressive laws in recent years - but for new attitudes.
A period of self-reflection was inevitable.
"We've had to change our picture of ourselves in Sweden," said Maria Carlshamre, a former television journalist who acknowledged last summer to viewers, against the station's wishes, that her husband had abused her for a decade. "We are not the gender equality champions of the world."
The turmoil began a year ago with the Amnesty International report, which took Sweden to task for failing to adequately curb violence against women and help victims cope with their situations. The organization also cited spotty prosecutions, vague statistics, old-fashioned judges and unresponsive local governments.
The report praised Sweden's laws as "unambiguous," but warned that "strongly worded legislation is not in itself a sufficient instrument to ensure women's right to a life without violence."
The group concluded that acts of violence against women had spiraled upward in Sweden in the last 15 years, a jump that could not be explained away as merely a greater willingness by women to report the incidents. The number of police reports filed for assault against women increased 40 percent in the 1990's, according to the Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention.
By 2003 the number of reported assaults had swelled to 22,400, from 14,000 in 1990. An estimated 16 women are killed by a husband or partner each year, the report said. And only a fraction of the cases involving assaults, rape, breaches of restraining orders or continuing abuse lead to prosecution, the report stated. The report also underscored that most incidents of violence against women continue to go unreported.
In addition, the network of shelters for battered women is deeply frayed, the reports says, with only about 150 of the 289 municipalities in Sweden operating shelters. Those open for business rely almost entirely on volunteer workers.
Like a picture-perfect family forced to come clean, Sweden found itself baring its own foibles, women and experts said. "There has been a turning point," said Liza Marklund, a journalist and best-selling novelist whose books have explored themes of violence against women. "Now people are beginning to take it seriously."
In October, Gudrun Schyman, one of Sweden's most colorful and radical feminist politicians, proposed a "man tax" in Parliament, where she is a member of the Left Party. The idea was to force men to pay for the consequences of their violence against women. The proposal stalled, but seized the public's attention.
Not long after, the justice minister, Thomas Bodstroem, declared his own outrage during a November demonstration to protest men's violence against women.
"Let this become an election issue in 2006," he announced. "Silence is a betrayal to all abused women, and a help to all violent men."
In March, the prosecutor general proposed building a team of 35 special prosecutors devoted to the issue of violence against women. There have also been proposals to electronically tag men who break the law.
The pervading sense that domestic violence is a crime affecting "others" is dissipating.
"It's not a question of a group of criminals," said Ms. Schyman, who is leading the campaign for the feminist party. "It's not alcoholics and drug users, and it's not people that are put out from the society. It's every man and in every class of society."
The same is true of the victims.
Ms. Carlshamre, 48, helped crack the code of silence last summer with her surprising on-air admission that she had been beaten and psychologically abused for 10 years.
"I said, 'Do you want to know what a battered woman looks like? Here she is,' " she recalled.
Ms. Carlshamre said she was fired because her bosses, fearing slander charges, had warned that the topic was off limits. She then ran for a seat in the European Parliament on an anti-violence platform, and won. "Now you can't talk about battered women like 'them' anymore," she said. "It's no longer about poor women on the fringe of society."
Still, many women are skeptical that things will change all that much, or that fast, and they point to the stubborn gender imbalance in the country's power and pay structure as the major reason why. This is precisely the reason why feminists are trying to form a political party.
"We have made much progress in the discussion of gender equality; it is a more advanced political debate," Ms. Schyman said. "This is one thing, and reality is another."
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Date of RADAR Release: April 18, 2005
Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting (RADAR) is a coalition of men and women working to assure media balance and accuracy in coverage of the domestic violence issue. More information can be found at: www.mediaradar.org
Thanks for the post.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
And this has to be protested...why?
these scum are nothing more than Oxygen Thieves...
My thoughts also. They have to include all male Democrats as domestic abusers.
Will they print my "opinion"?
Charlie Strangel said all rich people are going to hell. I guess that will come as a shock to the members of his own party.
"Charlie Strangel said all rich people are going to hell. I guess that will come as a shock to the members of his own party."
Ted Kennedy finally gets a leadership position.
Lesbians trying to shake loose some new meat.
When the flames hit that gasbag, it will be a thermonuclear explosion.
I was going to say something, but thought better of it! ;-)
Remember that this is the liberals speaking. They only report what they experience themselves. They assume that everyone else is just like they are.
Or maybe they are trying to rationalize their own behavior by saying that everyone does it.
There's only one thing that all the women in shelters have in common: bad timing.
That out of the way, it is common knowledge that people of all classes from society have domestic violence issues. It's just not that ALL people of all classes from society have domestic violence issues.
I think the editor has decided that distinction is not important enough to make. Do we really expect any better of the wimps that run this paper? I know we SHOULD.
"It's not a question of a group of criminals," said Ms. Schyman, who is leading the campaign for the feminist party. "It's not alcoholics and drug users, and it's not people that are put out from the society. It's every man and in every class of society."
Huh? I didn't read it to accuse every single man of being an abuser. Rather abuse isn't confined to criminal (chronically- violent types) nor to alcoholics or drug abusers. The quote is more that abusers come from all walks of life and from all social classes.
Save your energy for real outrages.
A paper isn't a public accomodation. They can print whatever they want.
Is someone going to start sending letters to FR because we say things that are left unchallenged?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.