Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Bolton vote - (treachery in high places)
JEWISH WORLD REVIEW.COM ^ | APRIL 19, 2005 | FRANK GAFFNEY, JR.

Posted on 04/19/2005 9:03:32 PM PDT by CHARLITE

Secretary Bolton's intimate understanding of these subjects has caused him to have strong views about them. On occasion, he has expressed those views forcefully and with a measure of rhetorical hyperbole. While some have seized upon his choice of words to disqualify Mr. Bolton, he is indisputably correct in arguing that the UN has rarely been united in the way and for the purposes its founders envisioned. He is also correct in noting that the international community has generally proven most effective in dealing with international crises when led by the United States. It would serve U.S. interests well to have the man charged with shaping efforts to reform and revitalize the United Nations guided by these insights.

John Bolton has been a steady and effective advocate for President Bush's policies inside often-hostile bureaucracies. That should hardly be a disqualifier for his promotion given that, in our government, agencies like the State Department are supposed to be part of an executive branch led by the President.

(Excerpt) Read more at jewishworldreview.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: antibush; attacks; bolton; charges; confirmation; congress; countercharges; defeat; democrat; hearings; house; johnbolton; myths; nominee; senate; statedept; strategy; un; ussenate

1 posted on 04/19/2005 9:03:35 PM PDT by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Treachery for sure!!! Once again an American that will stand up for Americans is stabbed in the Back, I'm sick of this Crap!!

Get the US out of the UN and the UN out of the US, The only sure cure!!


2 posted on 04/19/2005 9:31:13 PM PDT by 26lemoncharlie (Defend the US CONSTITUTION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

We can blame Dick Lugar who lets the Democrats run rings around him in the committee and George Voinovich and Chuck Hagel for their lack of spine by listening to RAT charges as gospel.


3 posted on 04/19/2005 9:33:38 PM PDT by TheEaglehasLanded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

the problem is, presidents come and go, but the folks at the state department stay.


4 posted on 04/19/2005 9:37:20 PM PDT by ken21 (if you didn't see it on tv, then it didn't happen. /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
John Bolton will survive these baseless attacks. Please send the RNC a letter stating that you will no longer support them if they don't counter these baseless attacks on someone who is an effective leader that is just what the U.N. needs. The woman that Sen. Joseph (Plugs) Biden was referring to in todays hearing that has alleged John Bolton harassed her in a Hotel in Russia and claimed Bolton smeared her by claiming she was going to jail for embezzlement is a complete fraud and the RATS know it. She was the leader of a group known as "Mothers against Bush" and is a far left activist who would stop at nothing in order to derail a Bush Nominee. The Junior Senator from Minnesota (Norm Coleman) did a good job of exposing this Democrat Shill who is nothing but a Hack for the left, and is not worthy of being taken seriously
5 posted on 04/19/2005 9:37:36 PM PDT by MJY1288 ( LIBERALISM IS FOR INVERTEBRATES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheEaglehasLanded
"We can blame Dick Lugar who lets the Democrats run rings around him in the committee and George Voinovich and Chuck Hagel for their lack of spine by listening to RAT charges as gospel."

Excellent insights. I agree. I've always thought that Richard Lugar was Caspar Milque Toast. He's so weak and mealy mouthed.....and so far, I'm not impressed with the way in which Bill Frist is running things, either. Oh dear. Oh dear........we need a "man on a white horse!" Quick! Where is he?

Alas, what we truly need now is RONALD WILSON REAGAN! No clones anywhere. He was "an American original." One time only. I miss him so much.


6 posted on 04/19/2005 9:40:20 PM PDT by CHARLITE (I lost my car keys............so now I have to walk everywhere.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TheEaglehasLanded

I watched CSPAN and saw how they just pushed Lugar around.

Republican Senators are weak kneed sissies.

Hagel is a joke.

I am not shocked at his line on this stuff.

The "rumors" about Bolton are turning out to be false.

The people who made the accusations....now won't come out and give any evidence....some have stated how they don't have any....and some have actually changed their stories.

Yet Hagel plays the patsy.


7 posted on 04/19/2005 9:41:52 PM PDT by ArmyBratproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie

I am so tired of these Republicans who have no balls to just get to the nut cuttin'. Mealy-Mouthed losers who don't have the spine to tell the Democrats to STFU and sit down!!!

Damn if they haven't figured out that they should be in control.


8 posted on 04/19/2005 9:47:26 PM PDT by Leofl (I'm from Texas, We don't dial 911)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Leofl
What can you expect from Republicans who get elected in blue states. Lincoln Chafee and Chuck Hagel are liberals whose only aspiration is to be loved by all. Voinavich (sp?) from Ohio, is simply a back stabbing Traitor who is for sale to the highest bidder. McCain is another Camera Hog who lives to be the Maverick without a spine. McCain reminds me of the cowardly Lion in the "Wizard of Oz"
9 posted on 04/19/2005 10:02:40 PM PDT by MJY1288 ( LIBERALISM IS FOR INVERTEBRATES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

You'd think the Republicans would realize at some point that they were the MAJORITY! but they aren't anymore they've splintered, the rats are simply staying unified. They won't accomplish anything, not like this!


10 posted on 04/19/2005 10:10:34 PM PDT by crab-boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud
Republican Senators are weak kneed sissies.

I would spit on the feet of any Rep Senator. They are weak-minded men who deserve our contempt. The Reps in Congress repeatedly frustrate those who keep wishing day after day, week after week for one of this girlie men in the Senate to ACT LIKE A MAN. They are a pathetic lot. Bush needs to bring them all to the wood shed and kick them on the right path. We will lose Congress in 06 they way things are going. Amazing.

11 posted on 04/19/2005 10:19:27 PM PDT by liberty2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TheEaglehasLanded

I'm so disgusted with the whole bunch of them. Republicans are either too stupid or too gutless to lead!!!!!!!!! They are an embarrassment!


12 posted on 04/19/2005 10:23:59 PM PDT by Proud Conservative2 (Somewhere there is a rattlesnake that likes people but are we to pet them all while in search of him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: liberty2004
"We will lose Congress in 06 they way things are going" Afraid we have lost it already. 3 1/2 months of the weak spineless jacka@@ has already done the damage.
13 posted on 04/19/2005 10:26:10 PM PDT by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

It is hard to decide who is more dispicapble lying dishonest Democrats trying to block the nomination on poltical ground or moronic Republican Senators intent on betraying the President and giveng a cheap victory to the Democrats.
I am one failed nomination away from saying to the Republican office holders; 'a plague on both your houses', you will see me in the voting booth as soon as there is a real "conservative" party on the ballot not a day sooner.


14 posted on 04/19/2005 10:38:40 PM PDT by Jonah Johansen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Leofl

I think we should elect a whole new Congress starting in 2006 of people we KNOW. Elect them as Favorite SONS or DAUGHTERS. Regular American People.

These FAT KATS of both parties have been selling us out for far to long. We need some regular ass busting people in the Congress to be AMERICAN!! Think American, and Pratice American.


15 posted on 04/19/2005 11:44:14 PM PDT by 26lemoncharlie (Defend the US CONSTITUTION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie
I think we should elect a whole new Congress starting in 2006 of people we KNOW. Elect them as Favorite SONS or DAUGHTERS. Regular American People.

This is the best thing I've heard all day. I have been pondering this idea for some time. The zillions of dollars spent on campaigns is nothing short of disgusting!

Think of all the chiillddrennn these fat cat millionaires could feed with what they would save on campaigns.(sarc)

16 posted on 04/20/2005 12:11:53 AM PDT by Just A Nobody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 26lemoncharlie

Right on, but my solution is (since the dummies and rinos are going to sabotage any presidential appointment) for the president to let it be known that they can take their advise and consent and shove it.
Bush should announce that if Bolton is shot down then there will be no replacement appointment. He'll just leave the useless UN ambassador post vacant. Who needs it?
That goes for just about any other alphabet post in the government as well - FDA, FAA, ADnauseum. Any of those posts can function with an acting head or assistant head. Think of all the money saved too.
This won't work for the appointment of judges other than if the judgeships aren't filled there might be a public clamor for the senate to get a move on - but I even doubt that.
I've had it with the U.S. Senate - the most useless and unaccountable body ever devised by man, and the closest thing we have to a pampered aristocracy. They should have to run for office every two years! Who needs their advice and consent pontificating? Our forefathers envisioned a wise deliberative body. They never imagined that it would evolve to the point of having only one of those qualities. And yes, I am aware of the Grand Compromise.
What can a senator do that a representative can't for his constituents?
I'm ready for the nuclear option. Unicameralism.
Then we can go thermonuclear and do away with the Civil Service system and go back to the spoils system. At least we get to vote em in or out every 4 years.


17 posted on 04/20/2005 1:47:32 AM PDT by A'elian' nation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: liberty2004
I would spit on the feet of any Rep Senator.

Why not aim higher, my friend?

18 posted on 04/20/2005 4:03:28 AM PDT by Uncle Fud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Oil For Food money at work...?


19 posted on 04/20/2005 4:10:17 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonah Johansen
"..as soon as there is a real "conservative" party.."

Check it out:

Link to Constitution Party

20 posted on 04/20/2005 10:39:32 AM PDT by Designer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson