Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Terror Scenario: Iran's Military Preparedness - (not to be laughed at; it's possible!)
CHRONWATCH.COM ^ | APRIL 23, 2005 | RACHEL NEUWIRTH

Posted on 04/23/2005 4:25:07 PM PDT by CHARLITE

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last
To: MikeinIraq

Would you agree that a military strike that would degrade their weapons and logistics, along with a concurrent decapitation of the Islamic Government would be a logical scenerio in the event that we use force?

By my thinking, that would be the most logical course, once we can line up some possible support from dissidents.


61 posted on 04/24/2005 6:27:32 AM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

that is what I am thinking, but we dont need to go Nuclear to do that.

The people of Iran were dealt a bad hand by being stuck with the Mullahs. They had no 2nd Amendment and the Mullahs have all the guns. They might need a little help and if the Mullahs tick the wrong way, there will be a new government in Iran someday....


62 posted on 04/24/2005 6:31:54 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (I want my very own Ron Mexico jersey and the NFL won't let me!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Thumper1960
Hey, thump.

Although the Japanese had no way to invade the US in force, I would agree with your statement.

Sadly, this retaliation scenario has been discussed on other boards, and the response from the left has been quite shrill that we do no such thing.

The execrable Arthur C. Chambers, California esquire, on the P&R section of www.Ferrarichat.com, is quite vocal in LOUDLY opposing any use of US nukes in ANY response to a nuclear attack.
63 posted on 04/24/2005 6:34:41 AM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

Oh, heck, I agree. I wasn't even considering nuclear weps.

The Mullahs have all the power, and the idea of a sucessful popular rebellion without help, is wishful thinking.

We did something similar to the Taliban. 8^)


64 posted on 04/24/2005 6:39:10 AM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

oh sorry, I was confusing you with Kozak. My bad....

yes we did, except there the northern alliance had some weapons. Afghanistan was and really still is a buyers market for weapons.....

The Mullahs in Iran have had more time and are much more efficient than the Taliban was at that....


65 posted on 04/24/2005 6:41:56 AM PDT by MikefromOhio (I want my very own Ron Mexico jersey and the NFL won't let me!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
The Left is always shrill. It's genetic with them.

The fact is, the muslim fanatic knows no other language than the use of force. To sit back and timidly respond with a few puny bombs or cruise missiles of conventional capacity would be to blink in the face of a mad dog. Inviting further bites and allowing ourselves to be slaughtered by the proverbial "thousand cuts".

The ancients would destroy their enemies by sowing their fields with salt and crushing their cultures. It is inevitable that we in the West will confront the muslim fanatics in a much larger war than what we now see. The decision to use all means and methods available to utterly vanquish them, when the time comes, must be made and must be stood behind by those we entrust with our lives. To do otherwise is to sign our collective death warrants.

66 posted on 04/24/2005 6:47:10 AM PDT by Thumper1960 ("It is true that liberty is precious; so precious that it must be carefully rationed."-V.I.Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

A version of Mutually Assured Destruction – if any one attacks and destroys Iran, they will attempt to destroy Israel.


67 posted on 04/24/2005 6:50:42 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
I hope those mullahs like this!


68 posted on 04/24/2005 2:52:35 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90
Holy cow! What a post!!!!!!!!

I'm speechless. Would you have the email addresses for the mullahs? We should send this photo to them immediately!

Char :)

69 posted on 04/24/2005 3:01:23 PM PDT by CHARLITE (I lost my car keys............so now I have to walk everywhere.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Not enough, eh mullahs!
70 posted on 04/24/2005 3:06:43 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Any such threat should be met with an immediate nuclear response.


71 posted on 04/25/2005 5:03:43 AM PDT by thoughtomator (Need quote from supporter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE; bang_list
We have enough power in place now to quickly reduce America to a third world status. The same technology infrastructure that allows you to project power abroad becomes your great internal vulnerability. We have long analyzed your entire internal infrastructure, from your economic vulnerabilities to the psychology of terror, and we know very well how to exploit them all to our advantage.

If this is a not so veiled threat to use nuclear weapons against home soil, given the FOXNEWS special last night, the thought is frightening indeed. I certainly hope we have taken enough of our subs and retargeted them on Iran so as to simply eradicate the country....if we use the Neutron Bomb, we can even keep their oil!

“Any attempt on your part to root out our sleeper cells would fail because they are so well hidden and also because it might trigger painful retaliation. This means that we can hurt you far more than you can hurt us. Even if you kill millions of us it will not save you from a devastating response by our sleeper cells on your people.

THIS is the real purpose for the SECOND AMENDMENT! They may do some damage in the Blue States, but the real heart of this country will survive and overcome!

We also have the capability in an extreme situation to simultaneously attack your troops and bases throughout the Middle East while creating havoc inside your country. How many millions of Americans are you willing to sacrifice in a war with us?

ALL OF YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US! (?) Sounds a little bit like they've hired Baghdad BOB as their publicity guy.

72 posted on 04/25/2005 5:37:42 AM PDT by ExSoldier (Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Tom Clancy would love this plot, but it would never actually happen.


73 posted on 04/25/2005 7:44:01 AM PDT by Zeroisanumber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

I hope they have their affairs in order.


74 posted on 04/25/2005 2:12:33 PM PDT by Always Independent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson