Posted on 04/29/2005 8:26:22 AM PDT by Nevadan
By no means am I suggesting that pediatricians tend to be pedophiles. But this is a case of a someone we know to be a pedophile who is a pediatrician. Under the circumstances, there is certainly reason to think that he is exploiting his position to take advantage of children.
But it had nothing to do with your question about organizations without diversity statements
me->2. Further proof that we cannot let the mentally damaged (homosexuals) into positions where they can come in contact with children
Who is "we". Who do you propose controls a child's interactions with others? The State or the legal guardian?
I was referring to we the parents. I will never let my children be in the company of a convicted child molestor nor in the company of a highly likely child molestor (homosexual) except under very close supervison. (I state this because my brother is trapped in that disease and I have children. While I can't keep them separated entirely due to such things as family reunions I can keep them under my eye at all times. My oldest is 4 1/2 and she's seen my brother once for about 8 hours. Never been alone with him and never will be. Unless of course he seeks reparative therapy (either religious or secular as they both work) and gets healed of this disease)
me->The Catholic Church, in the areas that had the greatest trouble with homosexual priests molesting boys, had become openly welcoming to homosexuals.
I wasn't aware the Catholic Church ordained priests who were openly declared homosexuals.
Lots of them. The rules were that you could be 'homosexual' but you had to be celebate. The idea was that even though the condition was fundamentally disordered as long as the priest was celebate like he was supposed to be it shouldn't interfere. I guess the RCC found out that there is no such thing as a celebate sexual deviant. Now the church is stuck with lots of diseased priests that cannot fulfill the office of the priest as they cannot be trusted around children. Add this to those who have been recruited on the sly by 'homosexual' bishops and seminary leaders and you've got quite a problem.
This is correct. Homosexuality is a symptom of a damaged mind and diseased sexual self-image. Sexual abuse works the same damage in both boys and girls. Part of this is the mental self-defense mechanism of identifying with one's attacker to remove the 'wrong' in the situation.
For the boy: "My attacker likes boys so maybe it's really ok to like boys".
For the girl: "my attacker likes girls so maybe its ok to like girls".
Different sexes but same result.
So heterosexual rapists are in fact also "recruiting"?
No. heterosexual rapists (who should be executed BTW) are just getting their rocks off. The homosexualization of the victim is just an unintended by-product. They are not intentionally trying to warp their victims like homosexual rapists do. However the motivation behind the crime doesn't change the fact that they should be executed for the crime.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.