Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Rule to Open National Forest to Roads
Yahoo - AP ^ | 05/05/05 | JOHN HEILPRIN

Posted on 05/05/2005 8:34:54 AM PDT by nypokerface

WASHINGTON - Governors are being given 18 months to change the Bush administration's plan to open up to 58.5 million acres of remote national forestland to road building, timbering and other commercial activity.

In one of its biggest environmental decisions, the administration will let governors petition for more or fewer restrictions against developing nearly a third of the 191 million acres of national forests, according to briefing documents obtained by The Associated Press.

The U.S. Forest Service planned to announce the new "roadless" rule later Thursday. It replaces one that former President Clinton had put in place little more than a week before leaving office in January 2001. Clinton's regulation blocked road construction as a way to prevent logging, mining and other industry activities in the backcountry.

The Forest Service, which will review and have final say over the petitions, calls the new process voluntary. "If a governor does not want to propose changes ... then no petition need be submitted," the agency says in the documents.

As much as 34.3 million acres could be immediately opened to road construction if governors submit no petitions or they are rejected, the Forest Service estimates.

The other 24.2 million acres currently are off-limits to road building under existing forest management plans. But environmentalists say the new rule would let the administration rewrite those plans to lift restrictions against development on most of that forestland.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: bush43; environment; logging; nationalforests; roadbuilding; timber
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: editor-surveyor

BTTT!!!!!!


21 posted on 05/06/2005 3:07:56 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend

BTT!!!!!!


22 posted on 05/06/2005 3:09:42 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: countrydummy; editor-surveyor; Carry_Okie; hellinahandcart

Still not what I'd like to see, but better than what we had under His Slickness.


23 posted on 05/06/2005 3:51:31 AM PDT by sauropod (De gustibus non est disputandum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: holyscroller

Good to "see" ya around!


24 posted on 05/06/2005 3:52:54 AM PDT by sauropod (De gustibus non est disputandum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GladesGuru
"Stroke of the pen" if I remember correctly.

Yes, Thank you!

regards,
-Lance

25 posted on 05/06/2005 4:25:39 AM PDT by Thoreau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

More logging ~ NOW!


26 posted on 05/06/2005 9:22:16 AM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Klinton's forest rules cost us more lumber in fires than we had used for construction or paper products since the country was first occupied.

The "pristine" forest envirowackos are just stupid anti human obstructionists. Mom nature will not be ruled, the forests will be used and replenished, it is only a question of what they will be used for, the generation of building material or the generation of ashes.

When enviros win, they lose, when they lose, humans win, the only constant winner is mother nature.

27 posted on 05/06/2005 10:05:50 AM PDT by Navy Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor; Trteamer; GladesGuru

Don't get me wrong, I would LOVE to take my '02 Wrangler into the back country. By all means, log these areas, and reduce the fire danger. I am all for opening the woods to recreational use, as long as it is responsible use. I don't want to see tundra turned into bog, for instance, or jeep roads turned into playgrounds for the 'let's see how muddy I can get my jeep' crowd. Hopefully the people using the back roads will stay on the roads. If not, I can still walk in.


28 posted on 05/06/2005 11:19:56 AM PDT by whipitgood (Public schools have replaced a biblical moral code with pragmatism. Civilization, beware!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nypokerface

"She's a Lumberjill and she's O.K....." /sarcasm


29 posted on 05/06/2005 6:11:58 PM PDT by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
But environmentalists say the new rule would let the administration rewrite those plans to lift restrictions against development on most of that forestland.
No condos or high priced subdivisions for you in the national forests say environmentalists.
Oh, just a sec...
Never mind. /smartalec response
30 posted on 05/07/2005 9:41:38 PM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: John O
Alternately, but not as favored, start logging all the national forests. Those trees are worth money and we could use the cash to pay off the debt or to reduce taxes.
Quit giving good advice to those who refuse to hear it. You'll go hoarse after a while.
I know I am.
31 posted on 05/07/2005 9:44:54 PM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson