[bad company]

Man is this gonna make them howl.

[GipperGal]

"It would be pure totalitarianism if a person were sacked for conscientious objection." The strong condemnation would already apply to certain Canadian provinces where, while ministers of religion are not forced to perform homosexual 'marriages' as of yet, civil marriage ministers are required to under pain of job loss.

I can't help but feel that we are about to enter a time of real persecution. Stand up for your faith and either a) lose your job, or b) go to jail.

[Ronin]

Whoa...

Talk about slapping down a gauntlet...

[Baraonda]

God bless and long live Pope Benedict XVI.

[SteveMcKing]

Good point -- it's not the direct cause of a degenerate society, but a symptom that other things have gone very wrong.

Correct what ever is wrong, and gay marriage won't even be an issue anymore. Not even a question.

[dasboot]

Where is he on Mary?

[kcvl]

Man is this gonna make them howl.

I think I heard heads exploding. lol!

[Atchafalaya]

Ooohhh, this is not what the "vocals" want to hear; Sullivan will crap. Good.

[Sir Francis Dashwood]

It was landmark U.S. Supreme Court precedent Reynolds v. United States in 1878 that made "separation of church and state" a dubiously legitimate point of case law, but more importantly; it confirmed the Constitutionality in statutory regulation of marriage practices. Congress, state legislatures and public referenda have statutorily determined polygamous, pederast, homosexual, and incestuous marriages are unlawful. No Constitutional Amendment restricting marriage is required to regulate "practice" according to the Reynolds decision.

Marriage is a religious "rite," not a civil "right;" a secular standard of human reproductive biology united with the Judaic Adam and Eve model of monogamy in creationist belief. Two homosexuals cannot be "monogamous" because the word denotes a biological procreation they are not capable of together; human reproductive biology is an obvious secular standard.

All adults have privilege to marry one consenting adult of opposite gender; therefore, Fourteenth Amendment "equal protection" argument about "privileges and immunities" for homosexual marriage is invalid. Driving, marriage, legal and medical practices are not enumerated rights; they are privileged practices that require statutory license. Nothing that requires a license is a right.

Homosexual monogamy advocates are a cult of perversion seeking ceremonious sanctification for voluntary deviancy with anatomical function and desperately pursuing esoteric absolution to justify their guilt-ridden egos. This has no secular standard; it is an idolatrous fetish. Why not properly apply the adjudicated Reynolds 'separation of church and state' here?

No person can logically say that carnal practices engaged by homosexuals are consistent with human anatomical function. It is obvious, and an impervious secular argument to say that biology is a standard by which we can measure. The hormonal drive to mate is biologically heterosexual. Either homosexuality is a choice, a birth defect, or it is a mental ill-ness. Take your pick.

Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145, 8 Otto 145, 24 L. Ed. 244 (1878).

- - See also:
Late Corporation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. United States, 136 U.S. 1, 10 S.Ct. 792, 34 L. Ed. 478 (1890). Revised as 140 U.S. 665, 11 S.Ct. 884, 35 L. Ed. 592 (1891).

[Joe Boucher]

The dems and libs are going to go all out to demonize anyone standing in the way of the fag agenda.

[conservativecorner]

AMEN BUMP!!

[fatima]

Thanks Coleus.Good strong statement.

[Zack Nguyen]

Asked about allowing same sex couples to adopt children, the Cardinal answered, "This would destroy the child's future, it would be an act of moral violence against the child."

Amen, brother.