If the company you work for (say Walgreens) requires you to dispense medicine you object to, maybe you shouldn't work there.
Not that I agree with the abortionist....but the pharmacist has a job and is employed to perform that job. Would the pharmacist also fail to dispense birth control pills? Or Viagra to single men?
This issue seems to be occuring more and more, must be a moral conundrum to some pharmacists, who are essentially playing God.
Or simply listening to God. GASP! -sarcasm
Walgreens and CVS have policies that give the Pharmacist discretion.
The real moral conundrum is going along with this orchastrated effort by baby killers to force pharmacists to have a hand in killing children.
The purpose of the FDA was to assure our medicines were safe, when used properly. The definition of safe has been changed to exclude a legal underclass of humans. By making the substance at issue legal, they put their thumb on the scale over who has a right to live & which individuals have a right to kill. I can see who is playing God here & it sure isn't the pharmacists who refuse to dispense substances that have as their only purpose, the death of a human.
If the company you work for (say Walgreens) requires you to dispense medicine you object to, maybe you shouldn't work there.
The employer in this case is large enough to recognize that there is a push to force them (the employer) to carry & dispense harmful substances if they are made legal by the FDA. If a state legalizes euthanasia, pharmacies (employers, private companies) may not be able to opt out. Will your answer for them be to go into another line of business?