Skip to comments.
Centrifugal weapon could deliver stealth firepower
New Scientist ^
| 5/11/05
| Will Knight
Posted on 05/11/2005 1:07:57 PM PDT by LibWhacker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 181-187 next last
To: Southack
..and thus why I have a business degree and not a physics degree.. thanks for the clarification.
81
posted on
05/11/2005 1:56:12 PM PDT
by
mnehring
(http://www.mlearningworld.com)
To: wideminded
"Snap your fingers, turn on a light. That was my idea..."
82
posted on
05/11/2005 1:56:53 PM PDT
by
theDentist
(The Dems are putting all their eggs in one basket-case: Howard "Belltower" Dean.)
To: LibWhacker
Looks like a Titleist!
83
posted on
05/11/2005 1:57:03 PM PDT
by
Doomonyou
(Molon Labe! FMCDH!)
To: avg_freeper
The acceleration is very nearly circular and entirely internal the 'firing' is just releasing a mass. The 'recoil' would be simple conservation of momentum. That deals with velocity and not acceleration. The recoil would be very sharp since it is nearly a instantaneous release but it would also be very small.
84
posted on
05/11/2005 1:57:20 PM PDT
by
TalonDJ
To: Congressman Billybob
Round bullets have an accuracy problem. But ball bearings with dimples on them could be more accurate at long distances. Witness the evolution of the golf ball.
This reminds me of a bunch of Revolutionary War rifle shot my grandpa had.. they started adding in large dimples (4-5) like large versions of what is on a golf ball. He said it was for accuracy.
85
posted on
05/11/2005 1:58:23 PM PDT
by
mnehring
(http://www.mlearningworld.com)
To: Born to Conserve
A Jai alai "high lie" ball travels faster than the scoop used to throw it. Are you sure about that? Seems to violate the laws of physics as they were taught to me, though admittedly we never looked at the physics of Jai alai! Thanks very much for that, though, BC . . . It'll be interesting to see what others say about it.
To: LibWhacker
We could reduce the diameter to six inches and still get you a muzzle velocity of 1,000 ft/sec if you were willing to carry around a rotating steel or titanium disk that was spinning at 40,000 rpm. You'd have to carry around a motor, too. :-)
Why are we assuming this is a motor driven or as others suggested a flywheel? Couldn't this be done through a controlled magnetic field, thus no need for moving parts?
87
posted on
05/11/2005 2:00:31 PM PDT
by
mnehring
(http://www.mlearningworld.com)
To: dandelion
I'd bet I'd be the only mom on my block to have a DREAD!
Would a safety lock be a dread lock?
88
posted on
05/11/2005 2:01:13 PM PDT
by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: LibWhacker
"We could reduce the diameter to six inches and still get you a muzzle velocity of 1,000 ft/sec if you were willing to carry around a rotating steel or titanium disk that was spinning at 40,000 rpm. You'd have to carry around a motor, too. :-)"Every home handyman with a $20 Dremmel has a centrifugal weapon capable of 40,000 rpm's and muzzle velocities of 1000 feet per second.
They'd just need small, dense projectiles and the right tube plumbing.
There was a whole series of sci-fi books a couple of decades ago about using steam engines to power wheels that would release projectiles...giving machine guns to 18th century armies.
89
posted on
05/11/2005 2:01:19 PM PDT
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: PreviouslyA-Lurker
Lol, a screwdriver would definitely fit in your purse, but a nice little .40 caliber or .45 caliber pistol would be better!
To: LibWhacker
It does some counter intuitive at first but the math is sound. The reason is the radial acceleration component. I can't rattle off the number off the top of my head. At home I have a copy of the proceedings of the space conference I first saw this at and in there are the complete mathematics behind this.
91
posted on
05/11/2005 2:02:36 PM PDT
by
TalonDJ
To: Junior
Except now you have to deal with Newton's Third Law: as the weapon spun in one direction, there would be a tendency for the platform to begin spinning in the opposite direction -- not rapidly, but enough to make Zero-G combat a rather hairy proposition. You simply make a second wheel that spins in the opposite direction, similar to some vertical take off propellar planes that were around in the 1960s or some two prop helicopters. This would keep the space station from spinning.
92
posted on
05/11/2005 2:02:39 PM PDT
by
calex59
To: LibWhacker
I can recall reading at least two science fiction stories involving such a device. Can't recall titles now, but maybe the existence of the stories would invalidate his patent.
Comment #94 Removed by Moderator
To: mnehrling
You mean like a railgun? It's true; railguns have awesome potential. Especially a nice little portable model I could slip in my pocket. But I think this particular invention involves centripetal forces; i.e., a spinning disk of some kind.
Comment #96 Removed by Moderator
To: Jerry K.
Would hate to see any meaty target after THAT does the job
To: bobbdobbs
The recoil would be absorbed as a wobble in the rotation. It is a transference of linear motion into rotational motion. So the energy does exist and does go some place it does not do it in a more traditional firearm 'recoil'.
98
posted on
05/11/2005 2:08:30 PM PDT
by
TalonDJ
To: marblehead17
Probably the Fetzer valve.
99
posted on
05/11/2005 2:08:37 PM PDT
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: MeanWestTexan
I suppose these could be scored like a golf ball. Of course, the Magus effect still affects accuracy.
100
posted on
05/11/2005 2:10:44 PM PDT
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 181-187 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson