Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Centrifugal weapon could deliver stealth firepower
New Scientist ^ | 5/11/05 | Will Knight

Posted on 05/11/2005 1:07:57 PM PDT by LibWhacker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-187 next last
To: Southack

..and thus why I have a business degree and not a physics degree.. thanks for the clarification.


81 posted on 05/11/2005 1:56:12 PM PDT by mnehring (http://www.mlearningworld.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: wideminded
"Snap your fingers, turn on a light. That was my idea..."
82 posted on 05/11/2005 1:56:53 PM PDT by theDentist (The Dems are putting all their eggs in one basket-case: Howard "Belltower" Dean.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Looks like a Titleist!

83 posted on 05/11/2005 1:57:03 PM PDT by Doomonyou (Molon Labe! FMCDH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avg_freeper
The acceleration is very nearly circular and entirely internal the 'firing' is just releasing a mass. The 'recoil' would be simple conservation of momentum. That deals with velocity and not acceleration. The recoil would be very sharp since it is nearly a instantaneous release but it would also be very small.
84 posted on 05/11/2005 1:57:20 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
Round bullets have an accuracy problem. But ball bearings with dimples on them could be more accurate at long distances. Witness the evolution of the golf ball.

This reminds me of a bunch of Revolutionary War rifle shot my grandpa had.. they started adding in large dimples (4-5) like large versions of what is on a golf ball. He said it was for accuracy.
85 posted on 05/11/2005 1:58:23 PM PDT by mnehring (http://www.mlearningworld.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Born to Conserve
A Jai alai "high lie" ball travels faster than the scoop used to throw it.

Are you sure about that? Seems to violate the laws of physics as they were taught to me, though admittedly we never looked at the physics of Jai alai! Thanks very much for that, though, BC . . . It'll be interesting to see what others say about it.

86 posted on 05/11/2005 1:59:27 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
We could reduce the diameter to six inches and still get you a muzzle velocity of 1,000 ft/sec if you were willing to carry around a rotating steel or titanium disk that was spinning at 40,000 rpm. You'd have to carry around a motor, too. :-)

Why are we assuming this is a motor driven or as others suggested a flywheel? Couldn't this be done through a controlled magnetic field, thus no need for moving parts?
87 posted on 05/11/2005 2:00:31 PM PDT by mnehring (http://www.mlearningworld.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: dandelion
I'd bet I'd be the only mom on my block to have a DREAD!

Would a “safety” lock be a dread lock?
88 posted on 05/11/2005 2:01:13 PM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
"We could reduce the diameter to six inches and still get you a muzzle velocity of 1,000 ft/sec if you were willing to carry around a rotating steel or titanium disk that was spinning at 40,000 rpm. You'd have to carry around a motor, too. :-)"

Every home handyman with a $20 Dremmel has a centrifugal weapon capable of 40,000 rpm's and muzzle velocities of 1000 feet per second.

They'd just need small, dense projectiles and the right tube plumbing.

There was a whole series of sci-fi books a couple of decades ago about using steam engines to power wheels that would release projectiles...giving machine guns to 18th century armies.

89 posted on 05/11/2005 2:01:19 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: PreviouslyA-Lurker

Lol, a screwdriver would definitely fit in your purse, but a nice little .40 caliber or .45 caliber pistol would be better!


90 posted on 05/11/2005 2:01:49 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
It does some counter intuitive at first but the math is sound. The reason is the radial acceleration component. I can't rattle off the number off the top of my head. At home I have a copy of the proceedings of the space conference I first saw this at and in there are the complete mathematics behind this.
91 posted on 05/11/2005 2:02:36 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Except now you have to deal with Newton's Third Law: as the weapon spun in one direction, there would be a tendency for the platform to begin spinning in the opposite direction -- not rapidly, but enough to make Zero-G combat a rather hairy proposition.

You simply make a second wheel that spins in the opposite direction, similar to some vertical take off propellar planes that were around in the 1960s or some two prop helicopters. This would keep the space station from spinning.

92 posted on 05/11/2005 2:02:39 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
I can recall reading at least two science fiction stories involving such a device. Can't recall titles now, but maybe the existence of the stories would invalidate his patent.
93 posted on 05/11/2005 2:02:48 PM PDT by JoeFromSidney (W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #94 Removed by Moderator

To: mnehrling

You mean like a railgun? It's true; railguns have awesome potential. Especially a nice little portable model I could slip in my pocket. But I think this particular invention involves centripetal forces; i.e., a spinning disk of some kind.


95 posted on 05/11/2005 2:07:10 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

Comment #96 Removed by Moderator

To: Jerry K.

Would hate to see any meaty target after THAT does the job


97 posted on 05/11/2005 2:08:08 PM PDT by commonasdirt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bobbdobbs
The recoil would be absorbed as a wobble in the rotation. It is a transference of linear motion into rotational motion. So the energy does exist and does go some place it does not do it in a more traditional firearm 'recoil'.
98 posted on 05/11/2005 2:08:30 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: marblehead17

Probably the Fetzer valve.


99 posted on 05/11/2005 2:08:37 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

I suppose these could be scored like a golf ball. Of course, the Magus effect still affects accuracy.


100 posted on 05/11/2005 2:10:44 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson