Posted on 05/13/2005 2:29:14 PM PDT by CHARLITE
Politics as usual has been playing itself out the past month or so over the confirmation of John R. Bolton as the new U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. The Republicans, who clearly have demonstrated they have no concern over our freedoms and sovereignty, have been singing Bolton's good virtues while the Democrats rant Bolton is a rat.
Then, to confuse this diversionary tactic even more, a handful of Republicans suddenly decided they had questions about Bolton. For these United States of America to continue even appointing a U.S. representative for this communist body is to give legitimacy to America's participation in the United Nations – a legitimacy that doesn't exist.
One can go on and on about all the programs and treaties generated from this corrupt organization and the tens of billions of dollars America has been fleeced to support it until the cows come home. The "food for oil" scandal is just one example of how this corrupt organization is sucking America dry. These treaties and programs are destroying what is left of our sovereignty.
There is no constitutional justification to rob the people's treasury to provide funding for the United Nations or any of its programs. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land and any statute, law or regulation in conflict with the very specific areas in which Congress can legislate is unconstitutional at the time of its inception.
Our participation in the United Nations is unconstitutional, both for funding and because of the treaty itself. The federal government does not enter into treaties with private organizations like Ducks Unlimited, only with other governments. The U.N. (United Nothing) is not a government. It is a private consortium of representatives from countries around the globe. It was birthed by communists. It is run by communists.
While Congressman Ron Paul remains the lone voice in trying to get the appropriate bill passed in Congress to free Americans from foreign bondage, your member of Congress refuses to uphold their oath of office by immediately getting this bill passed. Instead, we are being forced, via taxation without representation, to pay for our own destruction by remaining in this communist organization.
Another very astute and patriotic American who served in Congress decades ago, issued this warning:
Congressman James Utt, House of Representatives, Congressional Record, Jan. 15, 1962, Page 215:
The goal of the communist United Nations is to completely disarm all Americans – make no mistake about that. For years, the United Nations has been pushing for a global tax as a means of redistributing the wealth of countries like America to "developing" countries, which have been called such for 50 years or more. If you think your paycheck is shrinking now, you haven't seen anything yet.
To remain in the United Nations is to commit national suicide. If Americans don't stop excusing their member of Congress because they support one favorite pet issue or vote for unconstitutional federal funding which finds its way into their district, creating jobs with illegal money, this republic is all but dead. To waste time arguing over a new representative for the United Nations is to continue applying a Band-Aid to massive internal hemorrhaging. Either we are going to get out of the United Nations or we are going to fall to a one-world government.
Any member of Congress who supports the United Nations supports communism, pure and simple. The question is what are the American people going to do about the fruits of their labor being stolen from them in order to support and fund this communist organization and the destruction of this republic? One place to start is to boot out Congress.
Devvy Kidd authored the booklet, "Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty," which has sold close to 2 million copies. She has been a guest more than 1,600 times on radio shows, run for Congress twice and is a highly sought after public speaker
Your absolutely correct. The UN is nothing more than a money pit for the Socialist. We don't need an ambassador to the UN we need to GET OUT OF THE UN!!
As long as the UN exists, the USA has to remain involved and flexing our muscle from within.
It sounds resolute to say "get the UN out of the USA and the USA out of the UN', however, that corrupt group of grifters would have more power, not less by our absence.
The void we leave would be filled with Putin, Chirac and Schroeder. Can we afford that?
Otherwise, I share your sentiments.
Without the US the UN is done!
The French, Russians and the Germans can't afford their own governments, let alone the UN. Start cutting the funding and watch it collapse!
So, for an analogy - if some members of the Neighborhood Watch committee are corrupt and incompetent - you would rather surrender to the gangs and street hoodlums, than use whatever power & influence you currently have?
Remember, you can't move - because this is the only neighborhood.
sp
It a black hole for our taxes. We would be better off on our own. They come to us for everything and we have to pay for everything, BS Cut off the Funding!!
There neighborhoods are their problems and our are our problems. We ahve not been paying attention to OUR neighborhoods. Schools, Unemployment! If their so smart, then they dhould have no trouble in getting things right. I doubt they will though.
American is just over two hundred years old, and we have accomplished a great deal. The rest of the world wants to remain in the Fudel system
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.