Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army eyes Raytheon's high-tech, seagoing Gatling gun (mortar defense)
Arizona Daily Star ^ | May 19, 2005 | David Wichner

Posted on 05/19/2005 10:24:09 AM PDT by Righty_McRight

The U.S. Army is looking at a Raytheon-made ship-defense system to shoot down mortar rounds that are fired at U.S. troops in Iraq.

The Army is studying Raytheon's Phalanx Close-In Weapon System - a radar-guided, ship-mounted version of a multibarreled Gatling gun - among several technologies to counter mortar and small-rocket threats, the company and the Army said.

The program is called C-RAM, short for "counter rocket artillery mortar" system.

The Phalanx is made by Tucson-based Raytheon Missile Systems in Louisville, Ky.

The Army has received two of the latest Phalanx 1B systems for evaluation under a Navy contract signed in March, said John Eagles, spokesman for Raytheon Missile Systems in Louisville, which employs about 350.

A "last line of defense" for ships, the Phalanx is a rapid-fire, computer-controlled radar and 20-millimeter gun system that can automatically track and destroy close-range enemy threats such as low-flying cruise missiles, small boats and helicopters. Since 1979, more than 850 Phalanx systems have been built and deployed in the navies of 22 allied nations, Raytheon says.

Firing 3,000 to 4,500 armor-piercing rounds per minute, the Phalanx was battle-tested by the British during the Falklands War. The advanced Phalanx 1B version includes advanced Forward Looking Infrared Radar and beefier gun barrels.

"The capability is there; the capability has been proven," Eagles said.

"The Army knows that the second-most-lethal threat they've got over there is mortars," he said, citing improvised bombs as the top threat.

Mortars are short-barreled, portable artillery weapons used to lob shells at targets within a few miles. They can be set up, fired and packed up in a matter of minutes, making it difficult for defenders to target mortar teams.

Harvey Perritt, a spokesman for the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command at Fort Monroe, Va., confirmed that the Army is researching ways to counter the mortar threat and that Raytheon is one of the contractors involved.

Perritt declined to give any further details of the project.

A military analyst said the Army is considering the Phalanx along with other countermeasures, including adapted anti-aircraft guns and rockets that detonate in the path of incoming projectiles, spewing out a pattern of shrapnel to increase the likelihood of a hit.

"The (insurgent) mortar teams are a problem, and they are looking at a number of different approaches to the problem," said John Pike, director of Globalsecurity.org.

"The enemy mortar teams know the U.S. snipers can't get out more than a mile or so" to shoot them, Pike added.

Pike said the Phalanx is a well-regarded ship-defense weapon, though it's seen little combat action with the U.S. Navy.

One possible drawback of using the Phalanx system, Pike said, is the danger its rapid-fire hail of projectiles poses to U.S. troops and civilians.

House Armed Services Committee Chairman Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., is seeking to earmark $75 million in fiscal 2006 funding to develop and field a C-RAM system, said Joe Kasper, Hunter's press secretary.

Tucson firm gets AF contract

Tucson-based NP Photonics Inc., a supplier of fiber-optic and laser components, has been awarded a two-year, $750,000 Phase II Small Business Innovation Research contract by the Air Force Research Laboratories at Kirtland Air Force Base in Albuquerque.

The SBIR contract will allow NP to further develop its compact "Panoramic Optical Power Amplifier," which uses the company's proprietary fiber-optic technology to amplify two-dimensional images, the company said.

Amplification of dimly lighted images is important in many military applications, particularly laser tracking of remote targets, the company said.

The company, located in the University of Arizona Science and Technology Park, 9030 S. Rita Road, also recently expanded its Scorpion line of fiber-optic light sources for telecommunications, research and sensor applications.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; cram; defensecontractors; gunporn; miltech; minigun; phalanx; raytheon; usarmy; usnavy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Courtesy of Raytheon Missile Systems
The Phalanx 1B Close-In Weapon System could be a "last line of defense" for ships. The weapon fires 3,000 to 4,500 armor-piercing rounds per minute. The new version features infrared radar.

1 posted on 05/19/2005 10:24:09 AM PDT by Righty_McRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight

Gah! I CIWS to defend against mortar fire?? Who'll defend against the CIWS! Nevermind where to put it (without it becoming a target).


2 posted on 05/19/2005 10:26:52 AM PDT by dagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight

Gah! A CIWS to defend against mortar fire?? Who'll defend against the CIWS! Nevermind where to put it (without it becoming a target).


3 posted on 05/19/2005 10:27:00 AM PDT by dagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dagar

It would also happily (and automatically) ventilate anything moving towards the base at more than 30mph. Can we say "speed limit enforced by R2D2 with a hardon"?

Put it behind the walls of the Green Zone. Anything comes over the walls, the CIWS shreds it.


4 posted on 05/19/2005 10:29:11 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight
"Firing 3,000 to 4,500 armor-piercing rounds per minute..."

It may work well when you're miles away from any object at sea, but on land where are all those rounds going to fall?
5 posted on 05/19/2005 10:30:01 AM PDT by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dagar

I gather it's a "baby" version of the C-Wiz..but still..the friendly fire risk is great..


6 posted on 05/19/2005 10:30:51 AM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jaydubya2

DING!!!


7 posted on 05/19/2005 10:31:08 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jaydubya2

Usually not on Americans, what's your point? :) You can get 20mm time-fused rounds that will blow themselves up after a couple of seconds of flight time.


That said, a version in 7.62 would probably work better.


8 posted on 05/19/2005 10:31:16 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight

Affectionately known as "R2-D2" to former Navy personnel, you don't want to be on the receiving end of that barrel.


9 posted on 05/19/2005 10:31:19 AM PDT by Lou L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; Eaker; Squantos

r2d2 with chubbie, coming soon to a battlefield near you.


10 posted on 05/19/2005 10:31:30 AM PDT by King Prout (blast and char it among fetid buzzard guts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight
Aw Crud! Now I want one.

I'd put it on my porch and use it agenst the jerks in Hondas with the big speakers
11 posted on 05/19/2005 10:35:28 AM PDT by Cowman (Just when you hit the bottom of the stupid hole you notice the guy next to you is digging)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight; Darksheare; SAMWolf; 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub

Gunner's Ping!!


12 posted on 05/19/2005 10:36:41 AM PDT by HiJinx (~ www.ProudPatriots.org ~ Operation 4th of July ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight

This could work. But I think that it will be mostly ineffective simply because of the possibility of massive collateral damage.

20,000 20mm rounds impacting a neighborhood will kill a pile of kids. Whether they actually got hit by our rounds or not.


13 posted on 05/19/2005 10:40:19 AM PDT by American_Centurion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; archy

Only a SWAG but could 6 or more shooters with RPG's volley fired along with a coordinated mortar attack from three tubes jam this puppy ??.......wonder what it's capability is to counter multiple targets at once ?


14 posted on 05/19/2005 10:40:49 AM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

Two words: Land Battleship.


15 posted on 05/19/2005 10:42:22 AM PDT by Darksheare (Computers fear me, humans shun me, and cats love me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dagar

It's a commonly held belief in the fleet that CWIS actually stands for, "Christ it won't shoot!" Anyone with CWIS experience will appreciate the acronym and humor. Did I spell that right?


16 posted on 05/19/2005 10:48:28 AM PDT by ACDSWIZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: King Prout

The chubbie of DOOM!! LOL


17 posted on 05/19/2005 10:48:37 AM PDT by snuffy smiff (Jean Fraud Kerry-the Botox BoatWarrior,"oh no, aground again and huge riceberg approaching")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

saturating the defenses? sure. any defense can be 'whelmed by volume.


18 posted on 05/19/2005 10:49:15 AM PDT by King Prout (blast and char it among fetid buzzard guts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Righty_McRight
There are weapons out there that are placing in excess of one million rounds per minute...down range.
19 posted on 05/19/2005 10:50:47 AM PDT by Osage Orange (Don't steal, the government hates competition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ACDSWIZ

That should be CIWS. As for me CICS is correct.


20 posted on 05/19/2005 10:51:21 AM PDT by ACDSWIZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson