Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court bans shackling of murder defendants
AP - StL Today ^ | May 23, 2005 | Gina Holland

Posted on 05/23/2005 9:57:00 AM PDT by EveningStar

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-193 next last
To: Diddle E. Squat
The Republicans could not have asked for a better timing of the release of this decision.

Absolutely correct. Time to go NUCLEAR. Now more than ever. There must be NO deals.

41 posted on 05/23/2005 10:28:18 AM PDT by billclintonwillrotinhell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: billclintonwillrotinhell

Someone posted on another thread that since this court likes to look to foreign law, perhaps they would prefer cages like they use in some of the European countries!


42 posted on 05/23/2005 10:28:26 AM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: visualops
How does this play in Fulton County?
43 posted on 05/23/2005 10:29:29 AM PDT by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: redgolum
And the guy that overpowered the guards, shot a few, and managed to get out of an Alanta court house is what? A fluke?

Yes, actually.

44 posted on 05/23/2005 10:30:40 AM PDT by Modernman ("Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
Scalia and Thomas were probably the only two Supreme Court justices who didn't solicit European authorities for their opinions on this case. President Bush sure as hell better put another Scalia and/or Thomas on the high court if he gets a chance. We can't afford another Souter.

What's amazing is that Republicans have nominated 7 of the 9 current Supreme Court justices, but only 2 of those 7 came through with some common sense on this case.

45 posted on 05/23/2005 10:32:56 AM PDT by billclintonwillrotinhell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
Someone posted on another thread that since this court likes to look to foreign law, perhaps they would prefer cages like they use in some of the European countries!

Cages for criminal defendants or cages for out-of-control Supreme Court justices? ;-)

46 posted on 05/23/2005 10:34:48 AM PDT by billclintonwillrotinhell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Oh, here's a great idea. F-ing morons.


47 posted on 05/23/2005 10:35:07 AM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

NO!!

After what happened in Atlanta they can still make that decision?

When you're up on a capital murder charge, you don't have a lot to lose and it's a matter of time before there's more violence in the courtroom.


48 posted on 05/23/2005 10:36:09 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar; All

Has any of the court's critics actually read the decision (as opposed to relying upon press reports and specualtion)? Here is the link -- http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/04slipopinion.html

I believe the court got this one right.


49 posted on 05/23/2005 10:36:11 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petro45acp

I agree - shackles and irons are no longer required, thanks to the advance of technology. A stun belt or harness hides under clothing just fine.


50 posted on 05/23/2005 10:36:19 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
No doubt Judge Lefco will be thrilled to hear of this insanity.

And the Judges in Georgia too.

51 posted on 05/23/2005 10:36:38 AM PDT by OldFriend (MAJOR TAMMY DUCKWORTH.....INSPIRATIONAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG

With or without air holes?


52 posted on 05/23/2005 10:36:38 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom
There's a belt that does that. Has a remote for the bailiffs.

Stun Belt Used for First Time on Defendant in L.A. Court
http://ljr.net/latimes/stun/
53 posted on 05/23/2005 10:36:38 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (Pray for us all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

Perhaps if the great unwashed tromped through their courtroom, SCOTUS might have a different take on the subject.


54 posted on 05/23/2005 10:36:43 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (NEWSWEEK LIED, PEOPLE DIED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

How'd I get here? I just woke up one morning and here I was. I want to go home, back to planet Earth.

55 posted on 05/23/2005 10:36:48 AM PDT by Spiff (Don't believe everything you think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billclintonwillrotinhell

Yes ... to both.


56 posted on 05/23/2005 10:37:49 AM PDT by kayak (Have you prayed for your President today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

I love it: The Constitution clearly emanates that the jury may not know what the defendent is charged with. Evidence is presented, and the jury is simply asked to decide, "Is the defendant guilty?"


57 posted on 05/23/2005 10:38:56 AM PDT by johnb838 (Liberalism = Leninism.... Liberalism = Bolshevism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: redgolum

Damn, how do you ignore what happened there? The SCOTUS must be taking the brown acid.


58 posted on 05/23/2005 10:39:36 AM PDT by thegreatbeast (Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852
Their logic is truly frightening.

Yes. In addition, as far as I could tell from the article, their decision had no legitimate constitutional basis. Nothing specific was cited, in reference to the Constitution, as to why shackling was unconstitutional.

The court is becoming more and more blatant in basing their decisions on mere personal opinion, ideology, foreign law, etc. Who knows, maybe astrology will be the basis of their next decision. They are a contemptible disgrace to the nation and even the concept of justice.

59 posted on 05/23/2005 10:40:06 AM PDT by Orca (Impeach! Impeach! Impeach!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy

It's really more like Leninism, designed to destroy Bourgeois society, than simply socializm. Socializm is merely a tool and a phase.


60 posted on 05/23/2005 10:40:38 AM PDT by johnb838 (Liberalism = Leninism.... Liberalism = Bolshevism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-193 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson