To: AntiGuv
no, they were to be together. To procreate, the first reason and recreation while doing it.
It wasn't meant for casual recreation.
622 posted on
05/25/2005 9:10:26 AM PDT by
Zavien Doombringer
(Have you gotten your Viking Kittie Patch today? http://www.visualops.com/patch.html)
To: Zavien Doombringer
"no, they were to be together. To procreate, the first reason and recreation while doing it.
It wasn't meant for casual recreation."
Then I am confused by why it is pleasurable even when a woman is not fertile, even after menopause? Let's keep it inside a monogamous marriage, even- after menopause married couples should not have sex?
Not trying to be contrary here, I simply don't get the logic...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson