Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AntiGuv
no, they were to be together. To procreate, the first reason and recreation while doing it.

It wasn't meant for casual recreation.

622 posted on 05/25/2005 9:10:26 AM PDT by Zavien Doombringer (Have you gotten your Viking Kittie Patch today? http://www.visualops.com/patch.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies ]


To: Zavien Doombringer
"no, they were to be together. To procreate, the first reason and recreation while doing it.
It wasn't meant for casual recreation."

Then I am confused by why it is pleasurable even when a woman is not fertile, even after menopause? Let's keep it inside a monogamous marriage, even- after menopause married couples should not have sex?
Not trying to be contrary here, I simply don't get the logic...
642 posted on 05/25/2005 1:09:10 PM PDT by Dawsonville_Doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 622 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson