Posted on 05/26/2005 2:21:12 AM PDT by bd476
Jiggling the Matrix.
Such Mandarins of the Matrix should be careful...
The Chinese come to mind.
http://www.sinodefence.com/c4i/default.asp
http://www.sinodefence.com/c4i/ew/ew.asp
http://users.bigpond.net.au/pongrass/security/security.htm (SMH, 8/18/2001)
http://www.specialoperations.com/Foreign/China/IW.htm
http://www.ceip.org/programs/info/infowar.htm
http://www.sans.org/rr/whitepapers/warfare/896.php
http://www.global-defence.com/2000/pages/china.html
http://www.fas.org/irp/world/china/docs/iw_mg_wang.htm
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2003/09/04/2003066387
http://www.gyre.org/news/related/Information+Warfare/China
http://www.rand.org/publications/CF/CF145/CF145.chap9.pdf
http://www.strategypage.com/fyeo/howtomakewar/default.asp?target=HTIW.HTM
http://www.herolibrary.org/p113.htm (Chinese, sic)
http://www.iwar.org.uk/iwar/resources/news/china-io-2003.htm
http://www.iwar.org.uk/iwar/resources/china/iw/chininfo.pdf
http://www.infowar-monitor.net/
http://www.carlisle.army.mil/ssi/pubs/display.cfm/hurl/PubID=62
http://www.fas.org/news/taiwan/1999/cn-08-17-99-11.htm (1999)
http://www.taiwansecurity.org/AP/2002/AP-072902.htm (AP 2002)
http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/ndu/chinview/chinacont.html
http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/awc-info.htm
http://library.nps.navy.mil/home/bibs/IWbooks.htm (IW resources)
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/prem/200506/kaplan (Atlantic - Kaplan - 05 - sic)
http://www.voanews.com/english/2005-03-23-voa76.cfm (VOA March 23, 2005)
http://www.jamestown.org/publications_details.php?volume_id=408&issue_id=3232&article_id=2369263 (Jamestown February 15, 2005)
http://www.csis.org/burke/hd/#reports (CSIS – resources)
http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/FMSOPUBS/ISSUES/china-internet.htm
http://www.sans.org/rr/whitepapers/warfare/ (SANS)
http://www.fofg.org/news/news_story.php?doc_id=782 (May 13, 2004)
http://armedservices.house.gov/issues/opeds/03-09-12tcs-china.html (HASC, 9/12/03)
http://www.space.com/news/china_dod_030801.html (August 1, 2003 – Space)
http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/20030730chinaex.pdf (annual PRC report July 2003)
http://www.military-information-technology.com/article.cfm?DocID=51 (November 15, 2002)
http://www.cia.gov/nic/speeches_telecommunications.html (CIA – Gannon - April 2001)
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/china-01c.html (Space Daily Jan 2000)
http://www.heritage.org/Research/AsiaandthePacific/BG1340.cfm (Heritage - Wortzel - December 2, 1999)
http://www.ndu.edu/inss/siws/ch1.html (William Fast)
http://www.aracnet.com/~kea/Papers/threat_white_paper.shtml (Kent Anderson, 1998)
http://www.securityfocus.com/library?cat=132&offset=70 (Inf. Ops /IW 1996
4 day old story, but still interesting.
I used to work Data Security for the largest Tax/Financial company in the world. Our largest outsource was to India, even though they were reported as the greatest risk to corporate espionage.
I also worked for one California's largest Healthcare Insurance providors, in Data Security. We had one employee, an avowed muslim, that worked in the technology arena. He was very good at what at technology
Nice enough guy, but I never trusted him.
It would be nice to think that they're not smart enough to hack and destroy, but it's not true. Remember, 19 of them went to flight school. That takes some education.
Let's not bury our hands in the sand.
Hopefully the new director of the Farm has this under control.
No Such has probably been working on this since 9/12/2001.
The “terrorist hacker” justification was probably just meant to through off the press. China’s the concern.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.