Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Which kills more: ideology or religion?
The Spectator ^ | 28 May 05 | Andrew Kenney

Posted on 05/26/2005 10:30:32 AM PDT by xzins

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last
To: colorado tanker

I understood that DDT did have a direct influence on egg-shell thickness (ie, number of broken eggs in the nests.

(Doesn't excuse killing millions of innocent humans to preserve eggshells, but it should be noted.)


21 posted on 05/26/2005 10:51:23 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (-I can only contribute to FR monthly, but Hillary's ABBCNNBCBS contributes to her campaign every day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Which kills more: ideology or religion?

Which bites harder: a cougar or a mountain lion? ;)

22 posted on 05/26/2005 10:52:42 AM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("Violence never settles anything." Genghis Khan, 1162-1227)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Which kills more: ideology or religion?

In this part of the country, apparently it's shouting the following phrase:

"Hey y'all! Check this out!"

23 posted on 05/26/2005 10:52:55 AM PDT by George Smiley (This tagline deliberately targeted journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

What's the difference?


24 posted on 05/26/2005 10:53:27 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Andrew Heyward's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
The last major war over religion was the Thirty Years War in the 17th Century.

Ehh??? Where have you been. The last major war over religion has been going on for 1300+ years, it's called Islam and its infectious spread.

25 posted on 05/26/2005 10:53:53 AM PDT by jb6 (Truth == Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

My understanding is that almost everything in Silent Spring was junk science. That the volume of DDT in use at the time had almost zero impact on the environment. Now that I said that, I'm not sure where I read it. Perhaps in the Skeptical Environmentalist.


26 posted on 05/26/2005 10:55:59 AM PDT by colorado tanker (The People Have Spoken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: xzins

A voice of reason.


27 posted on 05/26/2005 10:56:04 AM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jb6
Ehh??? Where have you been. The last major war over religion has been going on for 1300+ years, it's called Islam and its infectious spread.

Total deaths resulting have been trivial compared to those of Communism and Fascism.

28 posted on 05/26/2005 10:56:09 AM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Restorer

Hitler killed 20 million in Russia alone, part of his plan to exterminate the slav.


29 posted on 05/26/2005 10:56:10 AM PDT by jb6 (Truth == Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Hitler’s holocaust 6 million, Stalin’s famine and terror 8 million, and Mao’s famine 30 million. But the greens have topped them all. In a single crime they have killed about 50 million people. In purely numerical terms, it was the worst crime of the 20th century. It took place in the USA in 1972. It was the banning of DDT.

But... but... They meant well, and might have saved thousands of birds.

That alone absolves them of any and all collateral damage.

I got to go meditate now.

30 posted on 05/26/2005 10:56:34 AM PDT by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen, ignorance and stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
You must be awfully young!

(Not that there's anything wrong with that!)

31 posted on 05/26/2005 10:58:35 AM PDT by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen, ignorance and stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: George Smiley

"And hold muh beer!"


32 posted on 05/26/2005 10:59:01 AM PDT by tiamat (Can't sleep...clowns will get me..can't sleep...clowns will get me...can't sleep....clowns will get)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jb6
Actually, Islam was stopped in the 17th Century and by the 18th was in retreat. Only recently have the Muslims been working to re-start wars of religion, beginning with the 1948 War of Independence with Israel.
33 posted on 05/26/2005 10:59:18 AM PDT by colorado tanker (The People Have Spoken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
Trivial? Of the 55 or so wars going on in the world, Islam is directly involved in 50 of them. In Sudan alone, Islam has caused 2 million deaths amongst the southern Christians and anamists. Add the 600 years of war between Christians and Islamics in Russia, Caucuses, Balkins. The Hindu Kush translates into the land of dead Hindus, where the islamics massacred several million Hindus when they obliterated 2 kingdoms there. Islam has been butchering for 1300 years.

They Young Turks and Atoturk after them, butchered 1 million Orthodox Armenians, 500,000 Orthodox Assyrians and 2 million Orthodox Iotolin Greeks.

34 posted on 05/26/2005 11:01:46 AM PDT by jb6 (Truth == Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

Don't forget the Turkish islamic massacres under the Young Turks and then Atoturk. Don't forget various Islamic massacres in India and SE asia. Don't forget about places like Nigeria, Ethiopia and southern Sudan (before the 1940s) or the SS muslim divisions Hitler used.


35 posted on 05/26/2005 11:03:40 AM PDT by jb6 (Truth == Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: jb6

You're mistaking ethnicity for religion in many cases.

In Darfur, for example, the victims are Muslims as well as the perpetrators.


36 posted on 05/26/2005 11:04:16 AM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA
Neither.....people with evil hearts kill.

----- *** EXACTLY !! ***

I agree. We have a problem of evil in this world but the Secular Humanists will always say that if we can only educate the ideologue or the religious person then we can have peace on earth. They are also fond of saying "seek rational and reasoned answers" for our problems.

I'm not convinced - Educated barbarians will surely kill you. : D


37 posted on 05/26/2005 11:04:55 AM PDT by Idisarthur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: xzins

More people have been killed in the name of God-duh than for any other reason.


38 posted on 05/26/2005 11:07:47 AM PDT by The Shootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
VI. Egg-shell thinning

DDT was alleged to have thinned bird egg shells.

Many experiments on caged-birds demonstrate that DDT and its metabolites (DDD and DDE) do not cause serious egg shell thinning, even at levels many hundreds of times greater than wild birds would ever accumulate.

[Cecil, HC et al. 1971. Poultry Science 50: 656-659 (No effects of DDT or DDE, if adequate calcium is in diet); Chang, ES & ELR Stokstad. 1975. Poultry Science 54: 3-10 1975. (No effects of DDT on shells); Edwards, JG. 1971. Chem Eng News p. 6 & 59 (August 16, 1971) (Summary of egg shell- thinning and refutations presented revealing all data); Hazeltine, WE. 1974. Statement and affidavit, EPA Hearings on Tussock Moth Control, Portland Oregon, p. 9 (January 14, 1974); Jeffries, DJ. 1969. J Wildlife Management 32: 441-456 (Shells 7 percent thicker after two years on DDT diet); Robson, WA et al. 1976. Poultry Science 55:2222- 2227; Scott, ML et al. 1975. Poultry Science 54: 350-368 (Egg production, hatchability and shell quality depend on calcium, and are not effected by DDT and its metabolites); Spears, G & P. Waibel. 1972. Minn. Science 28(3):4-5; Tucker, RK & HA Haegele. 1970. Bull Environ Contam. Toxicol 5:191-194 (Neither egg weight nor shell thickness affected by 300 parts per million DDT in daily diet);Edwards, JG. 1973. Statement and affidavit, U.S. Senate Committee on Agriculture, 24 pages, October 24, 1973; Poult Sci 1979 Nov;58(6):1432-49 ("There was no correlation between concentrations of pesticides and egg shell thinning].") ]

Experiments associating DDT with egg shell thinning involve doses much higher than would ever be encountered in the wild.

[J Toxicol Environ Health 1977 Nov;3(4):699-704 (50 ppm for 6 months); Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 1978;7(3):359-67 ("acute" doses); Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh) 1982 Feb;50(2):121-9 (40 mg/kg/day for 45 days); Fed Proc 1977 May;36(6):1888-93 ("In well-controlled experiments using white leghorn chickens and Japanese quail, dietary PCBs, DDT and related compounds produced no detrimental effects on eggshell quality. ... no detrimental effects on eggshell quality, egg production or hatchability were found with ... DDT up to 100 ppm)]

Laboratory egg shell thinning required massive doses of DDE far in excess of anything expected in nature, and massive laboratory doses produce much less thinning than is seen in many of the thin-shelled eggs collected in the wild.

[Hazeltine, WE. 1974. Statement and affidavit, EPA Hearings on Tussock Moth Control, Portland Oregon, p. 9 (January 14, 1974)]

Years of carefully controlled feeding experiments involving levels of DDT as high as present in most wild birds resulted in no tremors, mortality, thinning of egg shells nor reproductive interference.

[Scott, ML et al. 1975. Poultry Science 54: 350-368 (Egg production, hatch ability and shell quality depend on calcium, and are not effected by DDT and its metabolites)] Egg shell thinning is not correlated with pesticide residues.

[Krantz WC. 1970 (No correlation between shell-thinning and pesticide residues in eggs) Pesticide Monitoring J 4(3): 136-141; Postupalsky, S. 1971. Canadian Wildlife Service manuscript, April 8, 1971 (No correlation between shell-thinning and DDE in eggs of bald eagles and cormorants); Anon. 1970. Oregon State University Health Sciences Conference, Annual report, p. 94. (Lowest DDT residues associated with thinnest shells in Cooper's hawk, sharp-shinned hawk and goshawk); Claus G and K Bolander. 1977. Ecological Sanity, David McKay Co., N.Y., p. 461. (Feeding thyreprotein causes hens to lay lighter eggs, with heavier, thicker shells)]

Among brown pelican egg shells examined there was no correlation between DDT residue and shell thickness.

[Switzer, B. 1972. Consolidated EPA hearings, Transcript pp. 8212-8336; and Hazeltine, WE. 1972. Why pelican eggshells are thin. Nature 239: 410-412] Egg shells of red-tailed hawks were reported to be six percent thicker during years of heavy DDT usage than just before DDT use began. Golden eagle egg shells were 5 percent thicker than those produced before DDT use.

[Hickey, JJ and DW Anderson. 1968. Science 162: 271-273]

39 posted on 05/26/2005 11:09:13 AM PDT by N. Theknow (BXVI - The cafeteria is closed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
you must be awfully young

You are so kind! :>)

As you'll note from my tagline, I'm a retired Army chaplain.

40 posted on 05/26/2005 11:10:31 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson