Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lesbian couple wins right to have names on birth certificate
Newsday ^ | 05.26.05 | WAYNE PARRY

Posted on 05/26/2005 9:45:58 PM PDT by Coleus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: little jeremiah
the homosexual agenda is slowly making inroads in certain states. I wonder, based on what laws did the judge made his decision?
61 posted on 05/28/2005 4:07:34 PM PDT by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

This coupled with the finding that a sperm-bank doner may be liable for child support tells me that most of the judiciary is absolutely out of it's collective mind


62 posted on 05/28/2005 4:52:41 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopeckne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods

most of the judiciary is absolutely out of it's collective mind >>

they are in New Jersey.


63 posted on 05/29/2005 5:38:49 PM PDT by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: LostInBayport
The document will be factually incorrect, and therefore useless.

Well, if you're worried about being factually correct, that was lost years and years ago. It's the law in a good many states that the husband of the mother's name automatically goes on the birth certificate, regardless of biological parentage. Easy way to become a parent without the hassles of adoption is for a man to marry a woman who's carrying a child out of wedlock.

64 posted on 05/29/2005 5:45:09 PM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
Sadly, heterosexual couples started this nonsense of conceving a child in a lab as if creating a life was a scientific process rather than a procreative mystical act.

Hate to break it to you, but it was never a mystical act. It was always the act of 1 sperm reaching 1 egg and fertilizing it. All the science in the world hasn't changed that one bit. It's still one sperm fertilizing one egg, same as it always was. Humping and grunting doesn't make for good mysticism anyway.

65 posted on 05/29/2005 5:48:49 PM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
In fact, all medicine is a perversion of biology....

That's downright nutty.

66 posted on 05/29/2005 5:51:18 PM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine

That hasn't been the case for well over 20 years now.


67 posted on 05/29/2005 5:56:44 PM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Melas

The Creator placed us above animals in dignity by creating us in His own image.

Apparently you have no ambition to rise to that great dignity.

While we have the option to reject that dignity, some choose the easy (and perhaps at times seemingly exciting or fun) yet amazingly shallow life of simply a human animal.

How tragic.


68 posted on 05/29/2005 9:49:22 PM PDT by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson