Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Remember_Salamis
The Senate was intended to represent the rights and interests of states at the national level. Nothing more, nothing less. That is now gone.

This also laid the foundation for SCOTUS to rule that state senates had to be apportioned "one man, one vote" also, thus abolishing the one or two state senators/county as an upper chamber, at least in California. It totally decimated the influence and balance of rural counties in state legislatures.

24 posted on 05/30/2005 6:32:11 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: ApplegateRanch
States do not require more than one house. Many would be better served by abolishing the legislature entirely, simply electing a governor, and having him or her contract out the operation to the lowest bidder.

Privatization of government was a way of life in Iceland for many hundreds of years, and they proved it worked. If government illserved the people, they simply bid for services from someone who could do well.

In other states, Massachusetts and New York for example, it really doesn't matter how big the legislature is ~ if they're not already in irons when elected, they soon will be eh?!

28 posted on 05/30/2005 6:36:44 PM PDT by muawiyah (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: ApplegateRanch; All

Thank you UNRATIFIED 14th Amendment!


30 posted on 05/30/2005 6:38:33 PM PDT by Remember_Salamis (A nation which can prefer disgrace to danger is prepared for a master, and deserves one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson