My Web journal can be found at nytimes.com/byroncalame. I'm not too optimistic. The Wall Street Journal's news pages was definitely for the underdog.
1 posted on
06/04/2005 7:56:08 PM PDT by
neverdem
To: neverdem
Greater transparency, I believe, can help you as readers better understand the news judgments that shape each day's paper They're pretty transparent right now. They just don't know it.
Stick a fork in 'em.
2 posted on
06/04/2005 8:02:50 PM PDT by
SIDENET
("You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred.")
To: neverdem
A fool's errand.
In order for
any MSM organ to regain public trust and confidence is to keep their news and editorial articles separate, to report news, not opinion, and to remember always that they are Americans first and newspeople second.
It's not unprecedented. The two ideas are not mutually exclusive. Up through the Korean War, that was exactly how MSM functioned.
There is no doubt in my mind that becoming "internationally neutral" (and thereby providing aid and comfort to the enemy) has cost us many thousands of American lives since.
Something I don't see changing anytime soon.
3 posted on
06/04/2005 8:03:35 PM PDT by
Publius6961
(Before)
To: neverdem
serving as a watchdog over the paper's journalistic integrity.Which should not take very long, as the paper HAS no journalistic integrity.
4 posted on
06/04/2005 8:04:12 PM PDT by
Maceman
(The Qur'an is Qur'ap.)
To: neverdem
New coat of paint for the old Edsel...
Trade it in for the web...
5 posted on
06/04/2005 8:19:51 PM PDT by
wvobiwan
(Liberal Slogan: "News maganizes don't kill people, Muslims do." - Ann Coulter)
To: neverdem
*My Web journal can be found at nytimes.com/byroncalame.*
"I'm not too optimistic. The Wall Street Journal's news pages was definitely for the underdog."
Strange that Calame wrote "actual"...
It's a "transparent" beginning for the NY Times - but fumigation works better and faster.
Before one can instigate "integrity control" one has to have a viseral sense of integrity.
6 posted on
06/04/2005 8:19:53 PM PDT by
purpleland
(The price of freedom is vigilance.)
To: neverdem
"I intend to post more actual reader e-mails..."
Calame's comment tends to imply there were less "actual reader e-mails" posted before...hummm!
The operative words being "actual reader"...suggesting that the NY Times has a fiction department.
7 posted on
06/04/2005 8:26:29 PM PDT by
purpleland
(The price of freedom is vigilance.)
To: neverdem
An ombudsman at the New York Times is like appointing a Chaplan at a bordello. As if there is anything anyone could say to make them stop what they're doing.
8 posted on
06/04/2005 8:34:49 PM PDT by
Doctor Raoul
(Support Our Troops, Spit On A Liberal Reporter)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson