What a Jack@$$
Posted on 06/05/2005 10:27:40 AM PDT by My Favorite Headache
John Kerry Reportedly To Present "Downing Street Memo" To Congress
June 5, 2005 7:36 a.m. EST
Douglas Maher - All Headline News Staff Reporter
Washington,D.C. (AHN)- After remaining almost silent since losing the 2004 election by thirty four electoral votes, Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts is reportedly planning to to present Congress with The Downing Street Memo, reported last month by the London Times.
The memo purports to include minutes from a July 2002 meeting with Tony Blair, in which Blair allegedly said that President Bush's administration "fixed" intelligence on Iraq in order to justify the Iraqi war.
The Downing Street Memo is a leaked Top Secret document that details the minutes of a 2002 meeting between top-level British and American government officials.
The memo states that George Bush "was determined" to attack Iraq long before going to Congress with the matter, and that "the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy."
Rumblings across Washington and the Internet claim this is a step from Democrats towards impeachment of President Bush.
Fellow Democrat Rep. John Conyers of Michigan has issued a statement on the U.S. House of Representatives stating that he is seeking information regarding the meeting minutes.
"I am seeking information regarding the charges made in the so-called “Downing Street Minutes” that there was a secret agreement between the U.S. and the U..K to invade Iraq by the summer of 2002, well before the president sought congressional authority." Conyers said.
"Please provide us with any information or leads you might have regarding such a secret pre-war deal, or other efforts to manipulate intelligence or provoke a response to justify war. We will treat any information provided on this site as confidential. Thank you for your assistance in this important matter."
However, All Headline News has re-discovered that a bill signed by then President Clinton named "The Iraqi Liberation Act of 1998" gave President Bush all of the legal recourse necessary for the war.
Stating directly from the bill: "Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 - Declares that it should be the policy of the United States to seek to remove the Saddam Hussein regime from power in Iraq and to replace it with a democratic government. "
The H.R. 4655 law was signed into effect October 31,1998.
Republicans plan to issue a response to Senator Kerry by using his own words against him, a tactic used in the 2004 Election. Where Sen. Kerry was quoted as saying the war was justified and Saddam Hussein needed to be removed.
Copyright © All Headline News - All rights reserved.
How did Madame Hillary trick M. Kerry into doing this?
I can't figure whether this is a stroke of genius or idiocy. In my warped political mind, I could manage to turn this into a Machiavellian moment.
BUT...with the hamfisted, Deaniac lunacy pervading the democrats, this should turn out to be the most entertaining fiasco yet.
hanoi Kerry is at it again....
PING
The first sentence of this article is a total lie.
The new schtick. Impeach Bush over Koran kicking or some other nutter "charge." Laughable.
Pray for W and Our Troops
So I guess Kerry is going to get really fat, grow a beard and start yelling in a gravelly voice. When Hillary! loses in 2008, I'm sure she'll do the same -- it seems to be tradition.
This is the desperation of a dying political party!
It's a little disturbing too, because it's such warped behavior coming from alleged statesmen... that their constitutencies have been sold on them - or worse, select them willingly - is frightening. Kerry's been re-elected what, four times?
Kerry continues to demonstrate the treasonous irrelevance of the socialists. This reporobate had better be RIGHT about anything he puts forth, otherwise it will be an excellent opportunity for the Repubs to BURY the radical left. Hopefully, this will be Kerry's last gasp -- and he can go back to chasing rich skirts in beer bars.
Idiots on Parade.. On a MSM outlet near you daily
Kerry, Edwards, Biden, Conyers, Boxer, Teddy
It's gonna be a long hot summer.. ;-)
It's entertaining that the Dems have been taken over by lunatics, but I don't expect it to last into the 08 season. I bet they come to their senses and put up a real candidate, and that won't mean HRC.
now we know what the w. mark felt story was all about:
a prelude to a democrap impeachment attack on a republican presidency.
heheh glad I could make your tagline LOL!!
It seems, that when Democrats lose elections, they go completely nuts, losing whatever little mind they may have had before.
Kerry and Gore are perfect example of this.
I hope the Dems go for it. I really do.
RATS THINK EU CONSTITUTION.
Even if true, I fail to see what the problem is.
The Commander in Chief would be derelict in duty if he did not think ahead and start planning tactics long before you go to Congress with firm and final plans.
| All Headline News has re-discovered that a bill signed by then President Clinton named "The Iraqi Liberation Act of 1998" gave President Bush all of the legal recourse necessary for the war.
|
Carl Limbacher
December 1, 1998
Rep. John Conyers, the ranking Democrat on the House committee now considering impeachment, has publicly linked President Clinton's fate to a more favorable policy toward Saddam Hussein's Iraq.
Conyers is a piece of crap who probably has oil for food dollars somewhere based on this story.
"I bet they come to their senses and put up a real candidate, and that won't mean HRC."
WHO, WHO, WHO would it be?
I'm sorry, I sounded like Amiri Baraka, ignore that. But who would that be? Who could it be? Miracle Joe Lieberman? The Breck Girl Edwards? John Francois Part Deux? Al "Slim Shady" Sharpton?
What an odd understanding of 'almost silent.'
Can I get an Amen, Brother!
That's why I live in a swamp far, far away!
Did Galloway tell him to do this?
I'd still like to know what Kerry knew about Oil For Food and when he knew it. For a variety of reasons.
There wouldn't happen to be a signed Form 189 stapled to it would there?
Senate Unanimously Passes Iraq Liberation Act,
Oct 7 Iraq News, October 9, 1998
This is what is posted in the bill itself...
COSPONSORS(1):
Rep Cox - 09/29/98
SUMMARY:
(REVISED AS OF 10/05/98 -- Passed House, amended)
Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 - Declares that it should be the policy of the United States to seek to remove the Saddam Hussein regime from power in Iraq and to replace it with a democratic government.
This country gets crazier and crazier every day!!!!!!!!!!!!!
No kidding......Kerry is morphing into Algore right before our eyes!
Looks like the Kerry campaign really never finished...
Senate Unanimously Passes Iraq Liberation Act, Oct 7
*********************************************
Excerpt:
***************************************************
Mr. KERREY: Mr. President, I rise to urge the passage of HR. 4655, the Iraq Liberation Act. Thanks to strong leadership in both Houses of Congress and thanks to the commitment of the Administration toward the goals we all share--for Iraq and the region, this legislation is moving quickly. This is the point to state what this legislation is not, and what it is, from my understanding, and why I support it so strongly, First, this bill is not, in my view, an instrument to direct U.S. funds and supplies to any particular Iraqi revolutionary movement. There are Iraqi movements now in existence which could qualify for designation in accordance with this bill. Other Iraqis not now associated with each other could also band together and qualify for designation. It is for Iraqis, not Americans to organize themselves to put Saddam Hussein out of power, just as it will be for Iraqis to choose their leaders in a democratic Iraq. This bill will help the Administration encourage and support Iraqis to make their revolution. Second, this bill is not a device to involve the U.S. military in operations in or near Iraq. The Iraqi revolution is for Iraqis, not Americans, to make. The bill provides the Administration a portent new tool to help Iraqis toward this goal, and at the same time advance America's interest in a peaceful and secure Middle East. This bill, when passed and signed into law, is a clear commitment to a U.S. policy replacing the Saddam Hussein regime and replacing it with a transition to democracy. This bill is a statement that America refuses to coexist with a regime which has used chemical weapons on its own citizens and on neighboring countries, which has invaded its neighbors twice without provocation, which has still not accounted for its atrocities committed in Kuwait, which has fired ballistic missiles into the cities of three of its neighbors, which is attempting to develop nuclear and biological weapons, and which has brutalized and terrorized its own citizens for thirty years. I don't see how any democratic country could accept the existence of such a regime, but this bill says America will not. I will be an even prouder American when the refusal, and commitment to materially help the Iraqi resistance, are U.S. policy.
What alternate universe does this author live in?
Of course! But be careful of getting bumped.
"After remaining almost silent......"
I can name that bias in only four(4) words.
LOL!!
Gotcha! :)
which is attempting to develop nuclear and biological weapons,
Right on the Senate Floor!!!
Earnest, you got the wrong Kerrey (not John Kerry). Try again. :-)
I can't wait for the crazy yelling Kerry picture.
Definition of Clinton Triangulation:
Allow the RAT party/far left to develop hysterical theories until the entire country is laughing at them.
ENTER, STAGE LEFT: Hitlary Clintoon, queen on a broom, to "save" the RAT party from their insanity so that she can steer them to the so-called Middle. Hitlary becomes the she-devil leader of the free world and is hailed a hero.
Damn, sorry about that.
But John Kerry must have voted for it....course he could have later voted against it!
Just another pathetic attempt by Kerry to improve his reputation and not be considered just a pompous ass by being a petty . . . . well, pompous ass.
Mark Warner seems to be the contender within a certain segment of the party for now, but things will of course change over the next 3 years.
The important thing is that not all Dem candidates are loons, and the party will probably eventually pick a non-loon.
Most of em think 8 years out of the White House over 10 years out of the congres is enough.
My bet, and it's just a hunch, is that Dean is out after the Dems lose seats in 06.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
That is false. The bill authorizes the President to designate anti-Hussein organizations and help them. It specifically states that it is not an authorization for use of the Armed Forces of the United States.