Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti-Gun Bills Advance in California
CNS News Service ^ | 6 June 2005 | Susan Jones

Posted on 06/06/2005 10:03:29 AM PDT by 45Auto

An anti-gun group in California says it is making progress on what it calls anti-crime bills.

The California Million Mom March is holding "lobby day" in Sacramento on Monday -- an occasion to urge lawmakers and the governor to turn two recently passed bills into law.

Those two bills include SB 357, which would require that all handgun ammunition bought and sold in California have serial numbers engraved on it.

According to the California Million Mom March, "When someone buys a box of bullets, the bar code and the buyers' identification will be entered into a state Justice Department database. Serialized bullets recovered at crime scenes will help police track the ammunition."

SB 357, sponsored by Attorney General Bill Lockyer, passed the California Senate last week on a 21-14 vote and now moves to the Assembly.

A second bill, AB 352, would require all new semiautomatic handguns sold in California after 2007 to be equipped with a "micro-stamping" system.

When the gun is fired, the bullet casing would be automatically inscribed with the firearm's serial number. The data on the gun also would be stored in an existing state Justice Department database

AB 352 passed the Assembly on a 41-38 vote and now goes to the Senate.

According to the California Million Mom March, the two bills will give police the evidence they need to capture criminals who use handguns to commit murders and other crimes.

"It's simple," said Griffin Dix of the California Million Mom March: "Do we want to catch murderers or not?"

Dix said law enforcement officers "are demanding these new crime-fighting tools to help them catch many more criminals who use handguns." He said in almost half of California murders, no arrest is made because of lack of evidence. Two-thirds of murders committed every year in California are committed with handguns, he added.

"If these proposals become law, police will get the tools they are demanding and Californians will be safer."

But Second Amendment supporters say California gun owners would be unfairly penalized if the bills become law.

That's because gun makers, faced with the expensive task of etching bullets and micro-stamping semiautomatic weapons, would either stop selling their wares in California or drastically raise prices.

"This legislation could essentially ban all semi-automatic pistols commonly used by California gun owners," said the Institute for Legislative Action, the "lobbying" arm of the National Rifle Association.

Critics also complain that the bills amount to a gun registration scheme.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; US: California
KEYWORDS: ab352; banglist; rkba; sb357
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last
No gun law is too loony for the California legislature.
1 posted on 06/06/2005 10:03:29 AM PDT by 45Auto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 45Auto

Go ahead, it matters not to me. I am a potential felon many times over for the California gun laws that I willfully fail to comply with now. What's one or two more?


2 posted on 06/06/2005 10:06:04 AM PDT by atomic_dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto

The government will be only as opressive as the people allow it to be.


3 posted on 06/06/2005 10:06:10 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto

Gun control is like trying to reduce drunk driving by making it tougher for sober people to own cars. (THR)


4 posted on 06/06/2005 10:10:08 AM PDT by umgud (FR, NASCAR, NRA, GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto

IN spite of the liberals, I'm going shooting myself soon. Only hard part is finding a good range around here.


5 posted on 06/06/2005 10:11:21 AM PDT by pcottraux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto

"When the gun is fired, the bullet casing would be automatically inscribed with the firearm's serial number..."

The legislators and backers of the bill want the gun companies to R&D the technology and pay for its implementation. Sounds like an unfunded mandate.

Crazy Law.


6 posted on 06/06/2005 10:14:25 AM PDT by Redcitizen (One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto; Dawsonville_Doc; Eaker; archy; Squantos

ok, this is really lame.
how can they pass into law requirements which are physically impossible to follow? how can they even dare to attempt it?


7 posted on 06/06/2005 10:15:00 AM PDT by King Prout (I'd say I missed ya, but that'd be untrue... I NEVER MISS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
"If these proposals become law, police will get the tools they are demanding and Californians will be safer."

What a crock of bull manure. I learned my lesson with California's "assault weapon" registration law.
8 posted on 06/06/2005 10:15:01 AM PDT by Rick Deckard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: atomic_dog

When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.
Good for you.


9 posted on 06/06/2005 10:15:08 AM PDT by Redcitizen (One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto

""It's simple," said Griffin Dix of the California Million Mom March: "Do we want to catch murderers or not?" "

Sure, so when is she going to start calling for heavy duty safes to lock up those "Assault Knives" she leaves out on her kitchen counter in plain and easy access by children and minorities?


10 posted on 06/06/2005 10:15:24 AM PDT by shellshocked (They're undocumented Border Patrol agents, not vigilantes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redcitizen

it is not only expensive, it is PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE.

nothing precise enough and tunable enough to create such "microstamping" of UNIQUE SERIAL NUMBERS or bar codes is robust enough to survive more than a very few shots, if any.


11 posted on 06/06/2005 10:17:06 AM PDT by King Prout (I'd say I missed ya, but that'd be untrue... I NEVER MISS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto

To be a an anti-gun communist, one must believe that there is so much gun violence that we should ban guns, but if a person desires a gun for protection from all that violence then they are just being paranoid.


12 posted on 06/06/2005 10:17:07 AM PDT by shellshocked (They're undocumented Border Patrol agents, not vigilantes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rick Deckard

Yeah, the toughest gun laws in the country exist in Washington, DC. And those laws have not prevented thousands of murders over the years in the nation's capital. More laws of this nature, anywhere in America, will not make that jurisdiction safer. Hell, we can't even enforce the laws on the books now. How silly and stupid.


13 posted on 06/06/2005 10:18:30 AM PDT by RexBeach ("Anyone can see what's wrong, but can you see what's right?" -Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: shellshocked
Sure, so when is she going to start calling for heavy duty safes to lock up those "Assault Knives"

Don't laugh. It's here.

14 posted on 06/06/2005 10:20:05 AM PDT by Lazamataz (The Republican Party is the France of politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto; King Prout

Psssst....tell these million mom boobs that criminals don't follow laws . They never have and never will.......


15 posted on 06/06/2005 10:20:36 AM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
A second bill, AB 352, would require all new semiautomatic handguns sold in California after 2007 to be equipped with a "micro-stamping" system.

When the gun is fired, the bullet casing would be automatically inscribed with the firearm's serial number. The data on the gun also would be stored in an existing state Justice Department database

The case wouldn't be too hard to stamp. Either etch the chamber so that a serial number is left after the case expands during firing, or else have a microstamp on the firing pin.

Trouble is, like most liberal ideas, it may sound good to a layman to propose, but it would only take a criminal 30 seconds with a file to defeat either system.

Last time I checked, murder is against the law, yet people are still murdered in Kalifornia. Passing a law doesn't mean that bad people will comply.

16 posted on 06/06/2005 10:22:24 AM PDT by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
What's happening to the state of my birth. *sigh*

The Second Amendment...
America's Original Homeland Security!

Be Ever vigilant!

17 posted on 06/06/2005 10:23:21 AM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: King Prout

Because the people making the laws are stupid. Or really smart. Make something impossible or very expensive to manufacture and suppliers and consumers will give up.


18 posted on 06/06/2005 10:24:11 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
Great- I'm gonna have to go to Reno to buy ammo now...more reason to move out of here (which may be in the works...stay tuned... :-)
I have 6 chef's knives in my kitchen- are these folks going to try and modify my knives as well? "We're proposing legislation that will require all bladed objects to imprint a unique serial number on each cut..."
Ridiculous.
19 posted on 06/06/2005 10:24:59 AM PDT by Dawsonville_Doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
ok, this is really lame. how can they pass into law requirements which are physically impossible to follow? how can they even dare to attempt it?

I'll answer that as soon as I am out of my transporter.

20 posted on 06/06/2005 10:27:33 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson