Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How the Senate majority leader played a game of filibuster chicken
Dr. Frist's periodic E-mail/National Review ^ | 6/7/05 VOLPAC E-mail (6/20/05 publication) | Byron York

Posted on 06/07/2005 4:51:37 AM PDT by Coop

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-177 next last
To: Admin Moderator

Ok, thanks. The rest of the post, however, contained good info, and I hope I didn't ruffle any feathers by reposting the text.


41 posted on 06/07/2005 5:54:15 AM PDT by kevkrom (Jack Bauer / Chloe O'Brien '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Coop

Good analysis. At first, I was very upset but I felt that I would wait to see how it played out. So far, so good.

I knew that there would be hand wringing and threats of throwing the baby out with the bath water, but I don't subscribe to that outlook.

Keep the nominations coming like trying to drink water from a firehose.

Pelican Five


42 posted on 06/07/2005 5:55:39 AM PDT by Pelican 5 (Hard work pays off in the future. Laziness pays off now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coop
They've been scheduled for weeks.

Um... it's only been two weeks since the infamous agreement, and I don't remember them getting beyond Owens. Then the Bolton mess came up and everything else has been back-burnered, it seems.

Scheduled for when?

43 posted on 06/07/2005 5:55:45 AM PDT by grobdriver (Let the embeds check the bodies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: randita
We got what we wanted, albeit not by the stick-it-in-your-face, smash mouth ultimate humilation method, which many wanted.

The jury is still out on whether or not we "got what we wanted". Owen was a nice start. Brown will be even nicer. The fact that Frist still has the constitutional option in his back pocket is certainly encouraging. And yes, the Specter spectre is still an unknown, so maybe it's good that he wasn't put to the test of an actual vote on that option. However it's hard to avoid the strong suspicion that some of the gang of 7 may have cut side deals that will yet turn the wins on these few battles so far into a wider Republican defeat later on. So I'm neither warm nor fuzzy about this yet...

44 posted on 06/07/2005 5:57:50 AM PDT by The Electrician ("Government is the only enterprise in the world which expands in size when its failures increase.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

Well in my book, Frist just went up a notch, though I still think any hopes he had for the Presidency went down along with McCainiac's in that deal.

I'm really curious to find out exactly what Trent Lott was up to in the middle of all of this. I've seen and heard more than one report that he was working behind the scenes pushing the Gang of 7 in order to show up Frist and the President. Word is, he has delusions of resuming the Majority Leadership when Frist steps down next year. Personally, I'd prefer Mitch McConnell, as he's always struck me as a Tom DeLay type of leader.


45 posted on 06/07/2005 6:00:38 AM PDT by ABG(anybody but Gore) (I don't hate anybody, except the French....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver
Scheduled for when?

Mr. FRIST. Mr. President, on Monday, June 6, the Senate will return from the Memorial Day recess and resume consideration of the nomination of Janice Rogers Brown for the DC Circuit. There will be no rollcall votes on June 6, but Senators are encouraged to come to the floor that day to speak on the Brown nomination.

As a reminder, cloture was just filed on the Brown nomination and the nomination of William Pryor to the Eleventh Circuit. Thus, we will vote on the cloture motion with respect to the Brown nomination on Tuesday, June 7, at noon.

Given the agreement reached this week, I expect cloture to be invoked and hope that we can proceed to the confirmation vote on Judge Brown early Tuesday afternoon. I also would like to remind my colleagues that we have time agreements with respect to the nominations of Griffith, McKeague, and Griffin to the circuit courts, as well. It is my intention to move to these nominations at an early time, as well.

Finally, since we were unable to finish our work on the Bolton nomination to be ambassador to the United Nations, we will revisit this issue following the break, as well.


46 posted on 06/07/2005 6:01:33 AM PDT by kevkrom (Jack Bauer / Chloe O'Brien '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

Wrong. History shows that ANY time there is a "compromise" (1850, 1991 budget deal) the winner is the one who gets ANYTHING tangible, regardless of the "principle" given up. Check it out: find me one "compromise" in Am. history where the winner got a principle. On the other hand, in the Comp. of 1850, the north got CA and the south got a promise to enforce the FSL. In 1991, the Dems got a tax hike for a promise to cut spending; and at Versailles in 1919, the Brits and French got tangible cuts in German arms in return for "promises" about "freedom of the seas" from Wilson.


47 posted on 06/07/2005 6:01:33 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

Well put... amazing how many saps eat it up.


48 posted on 06/07/2005 6:03:16 AM PDT by johnny7 (PREDICTION; Bill Clinton will die of 'Arafat's Disease'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ABG(anybody but Gore)
Well in my book, Frist just went up a notch, though I still think any hopes he had for the Presidency went down along with McCainiac's in that deal.

McCain is toast, but the story has yet to be written about Frist. His political future will hinge on the Supreme Court nominations. That fight will make the current one look like a practice game.

49 posted on 06/07/2005 6:11:16 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom
This, I like.
Thanks.
50 posted on 06/07/2005 6:13:23 AM PDT by grobdriver (Let the embeds check the bodies!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver

A big bunch of loony libs were on C Span last night lamenting Janice Rodgers Brown in great detail. They showed a long list of orgs that oppose Brown. Libs are hoping that Brown will be defeated by the Senate, but let's see what the Pubbies do.


51 posted on 06/07/2005 6:14:00 AM PDT by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: LS
Lets see... we have 10 judges we want... and we get three... maybe. And, as a bonus... the filabuster remains.

Hey pal... I got some magic beans I 'wanna sell 'ya!

52 posted on 06/07/2005 6:15:43 AM PDT by johnny7 (PREDICTION; Bill Clinton will die of 'Arafat's Disease'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver
Scheduled for when?

I forget exactly. I believe Brown is today and Pryor Thursday or Friday.

53 posted on 06/07/2005 6:16:12 AM PDT by Coop (In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: The Electrician
So I'm neither warm nor fuzzy about this yet...

And to me that's perfectly understandable. It's the "This deal is a disaster for the GOP!" crowd that makes me weary.

54 posted on 06/07/2005 6:17:25 AM PDT by Coop (In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
Well put... amazing how many saps eat it up.

And it's amazing how many times you can post without actually saying anything of substance.

55 posted on 06/07/2005 6:19:33 AM PDT by Coop (In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
The only way this could be portrayed as a Republican victory... would be that when the it came to numbers, Frist didn't have the votes to break the filabuster.

No he didn't.

But from the article, he does now! That means that this was a masterful stroke for the conservatives inside the Party.

56 posted on 06/07/2005 6:23:08 AM PDT by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

So, you're saying Frist won DESPITE not having the votes? I suggest you rethink your position.


57 posted on 06/07/2005 6:25:10 AM PDT by chiller (DONE: Gore, taxes, terrorism,Kerry, Old Media. TO DO: Judges, Tort, IRS, Soc.Sec.,borders..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

Thanks for the ping. I'm uneasy that whenever something has to be explained why it's a good deal for us, that's it's not really a great deal. LOL


58 posted on 06/07/2005 6:29:40 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: D Rider

You're entitled to your own opinion... no matter which brand of rose-colored glasses you wish to wear.


59 posted on 06/07/2005 6:30:42 AM PDT by johnny7 (PREDICTION; Bill Clinton will die of 'Arafat's Disease'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
Lets see... we have 10 judges we want... and we get three... maybe.

You're not going to have votes on 10 judges in one day. Let's wait and see what happens. In my book, the situation is encouraging. We have three so far, Frist is not backing down, and DeWine/Graham are looking for the tall grass. They will not support the deal if another judicial fillibuster occurs. The Dems have been locked into citing "extraordinary circumstances" if they do fillibuster. Since simply being opposed to a nominee is not going to cut it, they will have a great deal of trouble making that argument stick.

Two weeks after the deal, I'd say we are in MUCH better position than we were two deals before the deal. The key is how much will Frist press the issue. I see no indication that he will not continue to press it.

60 posted on 06/07/2005 6:31:43 AM PDT by PMCarey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-177 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson