Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court - Overturning Roe. v. Wade
June 10, 2005 | Michael Katz

Posted on 06/09/2005 11:05:11 PM PDT by Mike10542

Who currently on the Supreme Court can we be somewhat confident would vote to overturn Roe. V. Wade and how many more do we then need for Bush to appoint to have the 5 to do so? (include Renquist as yes vote as we can assume when he retires his whoever takes over for him will be pro-life.

I got three definites:

Scalia Thomas Renquist (or replacement)

Is there anyone else of the remaining six justices. If not, then I guess we need 3 more originalists on the appointed to the Supreme Court.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/09/2005 11:05:11 PM PDT by Mike10542
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mike10542

Wow, sorry about the grammar errors. It is pretty late.


2 posted on 06/09/2005 11:06:41 PM PDT by Mike10542
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike10542

That's it, Scalia and Thomas. Rehnquist's replacement would be sure to be a vote to overturn. Bush needs two more appointments to the Supreme Court, and even then, there's no guarantee that some solid conservative won't turn out to be a squish, like O'Connor or Kennedy. DC has a way of messing with the brains of the weak-minded.


3 posted on 06/09/2005 11:11:58 PM PDT by Defiant (Coming to a theater near you: Indiana Frist and the Traitors for a Lost Cause)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike10542
Scalia Thomas Renquist (or replacement)

That's all. We need two more.
4 posted on 06/09/2005 11:21:07 PM PDT by Jaysun (No matter how hot she is, some man, somewhere, is tired of her sh*t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun

So really its the next three vacancies, assuming the first will be Renquist. SO we need not only to get three conservatives on the Supreme Court, but need to hope all three are like Scalia and Thomas


5 posted on 06/09/2005 11:24:54 PM PDT by Mike10542
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun

So really its the next three vacancies, assuming the first will be Renquist. SO we need not only to get three conservatives on the Supreme Court, but need to hope all three are like Scalia and Thomas


6 posted on 06/09/2005 11:24:54 PM PDT by Mike10542
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mike10542
So really its the next three vacancies, assuming the first will be Renquist. SO we need not only to get three conservatives on the Supreme Court, but need to hope all three are like Scalia and Thomas

President Bush may get to appoint two. Bottom line, we have to hold on to the White House in 2008.
7 posted on 06/09/2005 11:29:14 PM PDT by Jaysun (No matter how hot she is, some man, somewhere, is tired of her sh*t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson