Hillary Appointee Tied to 9/11 Blunder

newsmax.com ^ | Saturday, June 11, 2005 9:32 a.m. EDT

[InvisibleChurch]

[NormsRevenge]

The 'wall' between the Truth and the MSM telling it remains intact.

[Enterprise]

Aw c'mon. Give the lil' girl a chance. Just one disastrous appointee and look what happened. Imagine what Hillary can accomplish with the whole damned Government staffed by Gorelicks!

[alrea]

While news of the CIA's scuttled 9/11 warning was a top story throughout the day on Friday - with nearly two dozen mainstream press reports, including a front page story in the New York Times - none of the reports so much as mentioned Gorelick's name; let alone her connection to Mrs. Clinton.

Is HRC on the board at the Times? The Times is willing to connect George Bush to anything slightly damaging.

[Newfy]

And Jamie Goreleck was a member of the 9-11 Commission. Nobody questioned why or how or by whom this appointment was made. It would appear it was a CYA appointment.

[Enterprise]

I wouldn't exactly say nobody questioned the appointment. Many of us sent faxes and e-mails demanding that she be removed.

[An American In Dairyland]

Fox News didn't mention Gorelick on Brit Hume's show last night either. They reported the story as though the FBI were completely to blame.

[anonymous_user]

Gorelick was tapped for her post by Hillary ally Webster Hubbell after he resigned from the Justice Department in 1994 to face charges of overbilling his legal clients.

Yep. There's the proof that Hillary, as first lady, appointed Gorelick. </sarcasm>

[Cicero]

Jamie Gorelick was loyal to bill clinton, not to America. That was true of all his high-level appointments. He preferred corrupt, indictable felons, because they are more easily blackmailed, so their personal loyalty can be ensured.

[wildwood]

blunder? BLUNDER???

[Calvin Locke]

How about Gorelick's enrichment over the Fannie Mae debacle?

[Liberty Valance]

Gorelick was on the wrong side of the table during the 9-11 commission hearings. She should have had to testify like Ashcroft or anyone else did.

[fish hawk]

My question is this: Where is Gorelick now? Is she still in a power position? If so , why?

[mc5cents]

I don't want some stupid Hillary "appointee" tied to something bad, I want the HILDEBEAST tied to it! Dammit!

[johnny7]

I saw the MSM dodging this all day yesterday. They all decried the 5 instances the CIA & FBI were forbidden to communicate info on the 9/11 terrorists... but NOT ONCE mentioned that bitch Gorelick or her FU_KING memo!

It was staring them right in the face... and the MSM just moved right along!

[Kaslin]

Isn't this interesting?

-- snip --"A chilling new detail of U.S. intelligence failures emerged Thursday, when the Justice Department disclosed that about 20 months before the Sept. 11 attacks, a CIA official had blocked a memo intended to alert the FBI that two known Al Qaeda operatives had entered the country.

And the left had accused President Bush of having known about 9/11 beforehand

[The Westerner]

Good questions.

[Liberty Valance]

It's starting to come back to me now....didn't Gorelick recuse herself during Reno's testimony? This was a set-up from the word go. Naming Gorelick to be a "judge" of these proceedings protected her and those around her from any scrutiny. Who nominated her to serve on this commission?

[Reactionary]

"And the left had accused President Bush of having known about 9/11 beforehand."

The Left is always on the political offensive. Always. They never give up any ground.

"What it is you've done, accuse your enemies of doing."

[hermgem]

To put Gorelick on the commission was an extremely clever stroke by Democrats to keep her safe.
Safe means: From testifying.
It was well known then that Gorelick was the key person writing procedures to effectively prohibit the FBI and CIA from communicating with each other.
Such need arouse with Bill Clintons arms dealings for campaign cash with the Chinese.
No CIA (international)intelligence communicated meant safety from arms deal revelations.