Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Appointee Tied to 9/11 Blunder
newsmax.com ^ | Saturday, June 11, 2005 9:32 a.m. EDT

Posted on 06/11/2005 9:14:01 AM PDT by InvisibleChurch

Saturday, June 11, 2005 9:32 a.m. EDT Hillary Appointee Tied to 9/11 Blunder

Press reports on Friday about a government report that offers new evidence on how the CIA failed to warn the FBI when two of the 9/11 hijackers entered the U.S. made no mention of the role played in the disastrous bungle by Hillary Clinton's Justice Department protege Jamie Gorelick.

Typical was coverage in the Los Angeles Times, which chronicled the efforts of a frustrated CIA agent who desperately tried to warn the FBI that Nawaf Alhazmi and Khalid Almihdhar had migrated to San Diego after attending an Al Qaeda planning session in Malaysia 20 months before the 9/11 attacks.

But instead of delivering the alert that could have helped foil the 9/11 plot, the CIA agent was told to cease and desist by superiors. Noted the Times:

"A chilling new detail of U.S. intelligence failures emerged Thursday, when the Justice Department disclosed that about 20 months before the Sept. 11 attacks, a CIA official had blocked a memo intended to alert the FBI that two known Al Qaeda operatives had entered the country.

"The two men were among the 19 hijackers who crashed airliners into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and a field in Pennsylvania."

As recounted by the Times, in January 2000, a CIA employee began drafting a memo addressed to the FBI's Bin Laden unit chief at bureau headquarters and to its New York field office. The memo contained virtually all of the details known to the agency, about two of the soon-to-be 9/11 hijackers.

"But at 4 p.m. that day," the Times said, another CIA Bin Laden desk officer "added a note to the memo: 'pls hold off on [memo] for now per [the CIA deputy chief of Bin Laden unit].'"

Eight days later, in mid-January, the first agent inquired about his warning on Alhazmi and Almihdhar.

The FBI's 9/11 report reached no conclusion as to why the critical CIA intelligence wasn't shared with the bureau.

But for anyone who watched the 9/11 Commission hearings, the answer is clear.

The FBI and CIA were hamstrung by the "Wall," a set of Justice Department directives issued by Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick that made it illegal for the two agencies to cooperate with each other in terrorism probes.

Testifying before the 9/11 Commission last year, former Attorney General John Ashcroft contended that "the single greatest structural cause for September 11 was the wall that segregated criminal investigators and intelligence agents"

"[Gorelick] built that wall" said Ashcroft, "through a March 1995 memo."

Gorelick's now notorious wall memo instructed prosecutors in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing case:

"We believe that it is prudent to establish a set of instructions that will more clearly separate the counterintelligence investigation from the more limited, but continued, criminal investigations. These procedures, which go beyond what is legally required, will prevent any risk of creating an unwarranted appearance that [the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act] is being used to avoid procedural safeguards which would apply in a criminal investigation."

According to now retired New York Times columnist William Safire, Gorelick was tapped for her post by Hillary ally Webster Hubbell after he resigned from the Justice Department in 1994 to face charges of overbilling his legal clients.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Gorelick fulfilled much the same role as Hubbell had, acting as Hillary's "eyes and ears at the Justice Department."

While news of the CIA's scuttled 9/11 warning was a top story throughout the day on Friday - with nearly two dozen mainstream press reports, including a front page story in the New York Times - none of the reports so much as mentioned Gorelick's name; let alone her connection to Mrs. Clinton.

The former first lady is currently seeking the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination based in part on what the media descibes as her strong national security credentials.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 911; 911commission; 911coverup; 911hijackers; 911timeline; abledanger; atta; clintonistas; gorelick; hillaryclinton; jamiegorelick; missedopportunity; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-66 next last

1 posted on 06/11/2005 9:14:01 AM PDT by InvisibleChurch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

The 'wall' between the Truth and the MSM telling it remains intact.


2 posted on 06/11/2005 9:15:39 AM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... The War on Terrorism is the ultimate 'faith-based' initiative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; InvisibleChurch

Aw c'mon. Give the lil' girl a chance. Just one disastrous appointee and look what happened. Imagine what Hillary can accomplish with the whole damned Government staffed by Gorelicks!


3 posted on 06/11/2005 9:19:31 AM PDT by Enterprise (Coming soon from Newsweek: "Fallujah - we had to destroy it in order to save it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch
While news of the CIA's scuttled 9/11 warning was a top story throughout the day on Friday - with nearly two dozen mainstream press reports, including a front page story in the New York Times - none of the reports so much as mentioned Gorelick's name; let alone her connection to Mrs. Clinton.

Is HRC on the board at the Times? The Times is willing to connect George Bush to anything slightly damaging.

4 posted on 06/11/2005 9:22:53 AM PDT by alrea (Help Wanted: New Jersey Dir. of Homeland Security; must be willing performer & handsome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

And Jamie Goreleck was a member of the 9-11 Commission. Nobody questioned why or how or by whom this appointment was made. It would appear it was a CYA appointment.


5 posted on 06/11/2005 9:24:09 AM PDT by Newfy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Newfy
I wouldn't exactly say nobody questioned the appointment. Many of us sent faxes and e-mails demanding that she be removed.
6 posted on 06/11/2005 9:27:51 AM PDT by Enterprise (Coming soon from Newsweek: "Fallujah - we had to destroy it in order to save it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

Fox News didn't mention Gorelick on Brit Hume's show last night either. They reported the story as though the FBI were completely to blame.


7 posted on 06/11/2005 9:28:50 AM PDT by An American In Dairyland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch
Gorelick was tapped for her post by Hillary ally Webster Hubbell after he resigned from the Justice Department in 1994 to face charges of overbilling his legal clients.

Yep. There's the proof that Hillary, as first lady, appointed Gorelick. </sarcasm>

8 posted on 06/11/2005 9:29:57 AM PDT by anonymous_user (Not everything's a conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

Jamie Gorelick was loyal to bill clinton, not to America. That was true of all his high-level appointments. He preferred corrupt, indictable felons, because they are more easily blackmailed, so their personal loyalty can be ensured.


9 posted on 06/11/2005 9:31:18 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

blunder? BLUNDER???


10 posted on 06/11/2005 9:31:19 AM PDT by wildwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

How about Gorelick's enrichment over the Fannie Mae debacle?


11 posted on 06/11/2005 9:36:54 AM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anonymous_user

Gorelick was on the wrong side of the table during the 9-11 commission hearings. She should have had to testify like Ashcroft or anyone else did.


12 posted on 06/11/2005 9:37:40 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (If you must filibuster, it's because you don't have the votes to win honestly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch
My question is this: Where is Gorelick now? Is she still in a power position? If so , why?
13 posted on 06/11/2005 9:37:48 AM PDT by fish hawk (I am only one, but I am not the only one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

I don't want some stupid Hillary "appointee" tied to something bad, I want the HILDEBEAST tied to it! Dammit!


14 posted on 06/11/2005 9:43:47 AM PDT by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch
I saw the MSM dodging this all day yesterday. They all decried the 5 instances the CIA & FBI were forbidden to communicate info on the 9/11 terrorists... but NOT ONCE mentioned that bitch Gorelick or her FU_KING memo!

It was staring them right in the face... and the MSM just moved right along!

15 posted on 06/11/2005 9:44:18 AM PDT by johnny7 (Mama T has seen her husbands 'dishonorable discharge'... close up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch
Isn't this interesting?

-- snip --"A chilling new detail of U.S. intelligence failures emerged Thursday, when the Justice Department disclosed that about 20 months before the Sept. 11 attacks, a CIA official had blocked a memo intended to alert the FBI that two known Al Qaeda operatives had entered the country.

And the left had accused President Bush of having known about 9/11 beforehand

16 posted on 06/11/2005 9:45:22 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk

Good questions.


17 posted on 06/11/2005 9:47:22 AM PDT by The Westerner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It's starting to come back to me now....didn't Gorelick recuse herself during Reno's testimony? This was a set-up from the word go. Naming Gorelick to be a "judge" of these proceedings protected her and those around her from any scrutiny. Who nominated her to serve on this commission?


18 posted on 06/11/2005 9:50:54 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (If you must filibuster, it's because you don't have the votes to win honestly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"And the left had accused President Bush of having known about 9/11 beforehand."

The Left is always on the political offensive. Always. They never give up any ground.

"What it is you've done, accuse your enemies of doing."

19 posted on 06/11/2005 9:54:30 AM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch
To put Gorelick on the commission was an extremely clever stroke by Democrats to keep her safe.
Safe means: From testifying.
It was well known then that Gorelick was the key person writing procedures to effectively prohibit the FBI and CIA from communicating with each other.
Such need arouse with Bill Clintons arms dealings for campaign cash with the Chinese.
No CIA (international)intelligence communicated meant safety from arms deal revelations.
20 posted on 06/11/2005 9:58:28 AM PDT by hermgem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance
Gorelick was on the wrong side of the table during the 9-11 commission hearings.

Absolutely, but Hillary didn't (couldn't have) appointed her, which is a slow, arcing pitch waiting to be hit out of the park by any leftist.

At least we know what kind of people she would appoint.

21 posted on 06/11/2005 10:00:04 AM PDT by anonymous_user (Not everything's a conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Reactionary
"What it is you've done, accuse your enemies of doing."

This is so typical of the left

22 posted on 06/11/2005 10:01:06 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: anonymous_user

http://www.nationalreview.com/levin/levin200404151634.asp

Mark Levin weighs in...


23 posted on 06/11/2005 10:02:24 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (If you must filibuster, it's because you don't have the votes to win honestly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance

She should have never been allowed to be on the commission other then to testify


24 posted on 06/11/2005 10:02:51 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

The CIA has been subject to congressional oversight since the mid '70s and the days of the Church Committee. What the h*ll have the members of the intelligence committees been doing through the years? They seem to know enough to leak info when it suits them.

"Congressional Oversight and the Crippling of the CIA":

http://hnn.us/articles/380.html


25 posted on 06/11/2005 10:05:10 AM PDT by LibFreeOrDie (L'chaim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Gorelick fulfilled much the same role as Hubbell had

Not quite, mercifully Chelsea doesn't have a sibling...

26 posted on 06/11/2005 10:09:10 AM PDT by null and void (Oh what a tag lined web we weave...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: anonymous_user
Absolutely, but Hillary didn't (couldn't have) appointed her, which is a slow, arcing pitch waiting to be hit out of the park by any leftist.

Maybe you're right but Hillary had to be pushing for Jamies' position on the commission to cover any possible tracks to her husband's administration which would ultimately reflect on her.
27 posted on 06/11/2005 10:09:39 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (If you must filibuster, it's because you don't have the votes to win honestly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: anonymous_user

I would love to have Brian "Moose" Wilson of Fox News interview Hillary on this subject...and a few others.


28 posted on 06/11/2005 10:14:01 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (If you must filibuster, it's because you don't have the votes to win honestly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

Image hosted by Photobucket.com
29 posted on 06/11/2005 10:15:48 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance

HRC would never submit to being interviewed by less than someone wearing butt-kissing lipstick. Along with pre-screening the questions, so there are available canned responses...


30 posted on 06/11/2005 10:24:58 AM PDT by Maigrey (Don't make me call the Emperor on you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Newfy
And Jamie Goreleck was a member of the 9-11 Commission. Nobody questioned why or how or by whom this appointment was made. It would appear it was a CYA appointment.

YESSIRREEEE!!!! What didn't go down Sandy Berger's pants was "handled" by the Gorelicker's position on the 9/11 commission.

Yup, those wacky Clintons had it ALLLLLL figured out!!

31 posted on 06/11/2005 10:25:09 AM PDT by soozla (Leaders KNOW the way, GO the way and SHOW the way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

Gorelick wasn't the "eyes and ears at the justice dept" - SHE WAS RUNNING IT - BECAUSE RENO WAS TOTALLY INCOMPETENT.


32 posted on 06/11/2005 10:26:27 AM PDT by CyberAnt (President Bush: "America is the greatest nation on the face of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch
It is still mind boggling that GORE-LICK was appointed as a member of the 911 Commission! She should have been charged as a Domestic Terrorist and tried!
33 posted on 06/11/2005 10:27:51 AM PDT by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

Well of course the MSM wouldn't report anything that would remotely be hurtful to their queen, the wicked witch of the north. MSM is too busy pushing the tired old theme since Jan 2000: "Blame it on Bush!"


34 posted on 06/11/2005 10:29:30 AM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Newfy

Gorelick was on the 911 commission to quash any references or connections of her or the clintoons part in the 911 bombing. Why else would she be on the 911 commission?


35 posted on 06/11/2005 10:33:11 AM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch; All
-GORELICK GATE: Developing--
36 posted on 06/11/2005 10:43:20 AM PDT by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reactionary

How can she sleep at night with over 3,000 dead?


37 posted on 06/11/2005 10:59:56 AM PDT by ncountylee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mc5cents

Patience.


38 posted on 06/11/2005 11:02:57 AM PDT by upchuck (If our nation be destroyed, it would be from the judiciary." ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee
How can she sleep at night with over 3,000 dead?

If there is any justice, she can't.
39 posted on 06/11/2005 11:10:08 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Why? Ask Jamie Gorelick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: anonymous_user

What law firm handled the Craig Livingston matter? Ms. Gorelicks old firm.......Where is that Craig Livingston anyway? Waiting for his security job back in the next Clinton whitehouse?


40 posted on 06/11/2005 11:15:01 AM PDT by oldironsides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

Thank you James Baker.

http://www.nationalreview.com/document/document_1995_gorelick_memo.pdf


41 posted on 06/11/2005 11:15:11 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Why? Ask Jamie Gorelick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Isn't this interesting?

-- snip --"A chilling new detail of U.S. intelligence failures emerged Thursday, when the Justice Department disclosed that about 20 months before the Sept. 11 attacks, a CIA official had blocked a memo intended to alert the FBI that two known Al Qaeda operatives had entered the country.

And WHO was in power 20 months before September 11? Hint to Leftists: it WASN'T George Bush...EITHER ONE OF THEM.

42 posted on 06/11/2005 11:19:22 AM PDT by Christian4Bush ("So...according to the UN, weapons that never existed are missing...again!" -Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Christian4Bush

Exactly


43 posted on 06/11/2005 11:22:50 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: anonymous_user
Gorelick was tapped for her post by Hillary ally Webster Hubbell after he resigned from the Justice Department in 1994 to face charges of overbilling his legal clients. Yep. There's the proof that Hillary, as first lady, appointed Gorelick. </sarcasm>
Well, let's see now . . . how did Hubbell "tap her for her post" after he "resigned from the Justice Department"? Someone on the inside must have done it. Inside, as in "under Hillary's thumb."

Here's the deal: Hillary promised her supporters back in '92, "Buy one [Bill] get one [Hillary] free." And not only so, but Bill never survives the Gennifer Flowers revelations if Hillary doesn't "stand by her man like Tammy Wynette."

So if Bill signed welfare reform and you think that's good, credit Hillary. If someone or the other hired Craig Livingstone, and no one in the White House is blamed for hiring him or credited with firing him, blame or credit Hillary for it. Was the first Clinton SecDef a joke who was responsible for Black Hawk Down? Blame Hillary.


44 posted on 06/11/2005 1:05:22 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: An American In Dairyland
Fox News didn't mention Gorelick on Brit Hume's show last night either. They reported the story as though the FBI were completely to blame.
A little too "fair & balanced" and sometimes a little forgetful ... Oh well, better than CNN. ;-)
45 posted on 06/11/2005 2:53:23 PM PDT by Tunehead54 (In memory of our bravest in armed service to our nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk
Here you go - let me know if you find out what she's up to now ...

Google for Gorelick

;-)

46 posted on 06/11/2005 3:04:09 PM PDT by Tunehead54 (In memory of our bravest in armed service to our nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch
 

 

CLINTON TREASON + THE GORELICK WALL
[FOOL ME ONCE, SHAME ON YOU! FOOL ME TWICE, SHAME ON ME!]

by Mia T, 5.5.04



(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
thanx to Fixit for the audio

 COPYRIGHT MIA T 2004


This story merits its own book, but what deserves immediate comment is the willingness of the Clintons to risk everything to keep the cash pipeline open. Schwartz kept it open and full. Before he was through, Schwartz and Loral would donate roughly $2 million to the Clinton cause. Whether Schwartz gave additional money or favors off the books is a question that deserves asking.

A second question that deserves asking is just how much damage Schwartz, Berger and the Clintons did to America's national security.

A third question worth asking is whether Ron Brown's very real threats to expose these machinations led to his death.

Some dare call it treason:
Jack Cashill reveals how Clinton sold America's security to China
WorldNetDaily.com| Wednesday, May 5, 2004 | Jack Cashill


Reverse Gorelick

by Mia T, 4.15.04
QUINN IN THE MORNING (ESSAY DISCUSSED)
(
MP3, REAL, WINDOWS MEDIA, WINAMP)



e would have it backwards and miss the point entirely if we were to attribute The Gorelick Wall and the attendant metastasis of al Qaeda during the clintons' watch, (which, incidentally, was then in its incipient stage and stoppable), to the '60s liberal mindset.

Rampant '60s liberalism was not the underlying rationale for The Gorelick Wall.

Rather, The Gorelick Wall was the underlying rationale for--The Gorelick Wall was (insofar as '60s liberalism was the Wall's apparent impetus) a cynical cover for --the willful, methodical malpractice and malfeasance that was the product of the virulent clinton strain of rampant '60s liberalism.

While it is true that The Gorelick Wall was the convenient device of a cowardly self-serving president, The Wall's aiding and abetting of al Qaeda was largely incidental, (the pervasiveness of the clintons' Nobel-Peace-Prize calculus notwithstanding).

The Wall was engineered primarily to protect a corrupt self-serving president. The metastasis of al Qaeda and 9/11 were simply the cost of doing business, clinton-style.

Further confirmation of the Wall-as-cover-for-clinton-corruption thesis:

  • Gorelick's failure to disclose the fact that she authored the memo that was the efficient cause of 911
  • Gorelick's surreal presence on the 911 commission investigating Gorelick's Justice Department, a maneuver that effectively removes from the universe of witnesses a central witness, Gorelick, even as it uniquely positions a central player, Gorelick, to directly shape the commission's conclusions. (Is there any question which two people are responsible for Gorelick's insertion on the commission?)

Conversely, that it never occurred to anyone on the commission that Gorelick's flagrant conflict of interest renders her presence on the commission beyond farce calls into question the commission's judgment if not its integrity. Washington's mutual protection racket writ large, I suspect.

The Gorelick Wall is consistent with, and an international extension of, two essential acts committed in tandem, Filegate, the simultaneous empowering of the clintons and disemboweling of clinton adversaries, and the clinton Putsch, the firing and replacement of every U.S. attorney extant.

Filegate and the clinton Putsch,
committed in tandem,
the product of a careful criminal calculus,
at once empowered clinton
and disemboweled his opponents.
clinton was now free to betray with abandon
not only our trust,
but the Constitution as well.

The Common Man
Mia T
February, 1998


 

Allegations of international clinton crimes swirling around the White House in 1995 and beyond support The-Wall-as-cover-for-international-clinton-crimes thesis.

Once the clintons' own U.S. attorneys were in place, once the opposition was disemboweled by the knowledge that their raw FBI files had been in the possession of the clintons, once domestic law enforcement was effectively blinded to foreign data by Gorelick's Wall, the clintons were free to methodically and seditiously and with impunity auction off America's security, sovereignty and economy to the highest foreign bidder.


(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
 

copyright Mia T 2004


also:
The Parallel Universe of Jamie Gorelick

The Mary Jo White Memo:
Documentation of clintons' and Gorelick's willful, seditious malfeasance


Memos show Gorelick involvement in 'wall'

Gorelick Agonistes
Her refusal to resign taints the 9/11 Commission

The Democratic Party's Problem Transcends Its Anti-War Contingent2

America's Real Two-Front War

The Left's Fatally Flawed "Animal Farm" Mentality
(Why America Must NEVER AGAIN Elect a Democrat President)


47 posted on 06/12/2005 4:14:54 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance
Who nominated her to serve on this commission?

Little Tommy Daschle appointed Gorelick.

48 posted on 06/12/2005 4:27:42 AM PDT by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Quilla; Mia T
Thanks for the info. The deomocratic party really is a criminal interprise.
49 posted on 06/12/2005 5:14:34 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Why? Ask Jamie Gorelick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

I wouldn't exactly say nobody questioned the appointment. Many of us sent faxes and e-mails demanding that she be removed.

6 posted on 06/11/2005 9:27:51 AM PDT by Enterprise

And the powers to be did as they always do, they ignored our demands, and did as they pleased.

We only mean something to them on election day. After that, it is go back under the porch and let the big dogs play. We know best what is best for you.


50 posted on 06/12/2005 5:31:29 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson