Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More babies, young kids going hungry in US (Blame Dubya's proposed cuts in welfare aid)
Yahoo News ^ | 6/11/05

Posted on 06/12/2005 5:00:16 AM PDT by Libloather

More babies, young kids going hungry in US
Sat Jun 11, 11:00 PM ET


An American butcher. Increasing numbers of young American children are showing signs of serious malnourishment, fueled by a greater prevalence of hunger in the United States, while, paradoxically, two-thirds of the US population is either overweight or obese(AFP/File/Stan Honda)

BALTIMORE, United States (AFP) - Increasing numbers of young American children are showing signs of serious malnourishment, fueled by a greater prevalence of hunger in the United States, while, paradoxically, two-thirds of the US population is either overweight or obese.

In 2003, 11.2 percent of families in the United States experienced hunger, compared with 10.1 percent in 1999, according to most recent official figures, released on National Hunger Awareness Day held this year on Tuesday, June 7.

Some pediatricians worry that cuts in welfare aid proposed in President George W. Bush's 2006 budget will only exacerbate the situation. By contrast Bush plans to keep tax cuts for more affluent sectors of the population, they note.

In the working class port city of Baltimore, Maryland, Dr. Maureen Black, a pediatrician, sees numbers of underweight babies in her clinic specialized in infant malnutrition located in one of the poorer areas.

"In the first year of life, children triple their birth weight," said Black, "and if children do not have enough to eat during those very early very times, you first see that their weight will falter and then their height will falter."

"If their height falters enough and they experience stunting under age two, they are then at risk for academic and behaviour problems" at school, said Black.

Dr. Deborah Frank, a professor of pediatrics at Boston University's School of Medicine, who also runs a specialised clinic for malnourished babies, has similar concerns.

"We are seeing more and more very young babies under a year of age which is a particular concern because they are most likely to die of under nutrition, and also their brains are growing very very rapidly," said Frank, in a telephone interview.

"A baby's brain increases 2.5 times in size in the first year of life," she says, adding that if the baby fails to get the nutritional building blocks he or she needs for the brain to develop, a child can have lifelong difficulties in behaviour and learning.

But infant-child protection centers do not exist in the United States, unlike it other countries, such as France, which makes children below the age of three or four years old somewhat invisible to authorities, laments Frank. "They don't come to my clinic until they are already quite underweight.

"Recently I have been alarmed because we are getting more children who are so ill that they go to hospital rather than they come to the clinic first" a situation which, in 20 years of practising medicine, Frank had seen reverse.

Some children in the United States occasionally look like the malnourished children we see in some parts of Africa, however, welfare programs targeting society's poorest ensures that problem is generally avoided, the pediatricians say.

Paradoxically, malnutrition is not always due to lack of food -- rather to the quality of the food being consumed.

"People often ask me how many children go to bed hungry. The answer is the parents work very hard so they don't go to bed feeling hungry. The parents try to fill the baby up with french fries and soda pop," said Frank.

In some areas, green vegetables and fruit are impossible to buy -- even in a can, because there may be no supermarket. Moreover, such items are costly.

"What happens in America is -- what seems bizarre -- that some of the recommendations that we give to families to prevent underweight of children are the same as we give to prevent overweight," said Black. "We recommend families not to give their children junk food."

In some families, eating junk food will mean one child is obese while the other is underweight, said Black. "The first will eat junk food and nothing else, the second will eat junk food and everything else."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aid; babies; blame; caca; cuts; dubya; hunger; hungry; kids; more; proposed; us; welfare; young
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-162 next last
The parents try to fill the baby up with french fries and soda pop," said Frank.

Hunger problem solved.

1 posted on 06/12/2005 5:00:17 AM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

If more "young kids" would stop having babies, the problem would be solved.


2 posted on 06/12/2005 5:02:22 AM PDT by bella1 (red county, blue state)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Bush's fault alert!


3 posted on 06/12/2005 5:02:26 AM PDT by SIDENET ("You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Someone needs to post tha B.S. meter alert

Mine B.S. alert is red lining it.

4 posted on 06/12/2005 5:03:17 AM PDT by Popman (In politics, ideas are more important than individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

There's no excuse for children being hungry in America.


5 posted on 06/12/2005 5:04:26 AM PDT by tahotdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Popman

beep beep beeep beep beep beep beep beeep!!!!!

mine too


6 posted on 06/12/2005 5:04:33 AM PDT by Casaubon (Internet Research Ninja Masta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Popman

7 posted on 06/12/2005 5:04:55 AM PDT by Popman (In politics, ideas are more important than individuals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Popman

Mine went off the scale.


8 posted on 06/12/2005 5:05:08 AM PDT by SIDENET ("You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I always tell the hand wringers that there is NO poverty in this country - except by choice. If children are going hungry, then the parents are not working or availing themselves of federal programs. In either case, the children should be put into state care becuase the parents are unfit morons.


9 posted on 06/12/2005 5:07:41 AM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (NEW and IMPROVED: Now with 100% more Tyrannical Tendencies and Dictator Envy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
But infant-child protection centers do not exist in the United States, unlike it other countries, such as France

Just a line from the article for everyone's enjoyment. The typo after "unlike" is not mine.

:-)

10 posted on 06/12/2005 5:07:42 AM PDT by SIDENET ("You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
In some areas, green vegetables and fruit are impossible to buy -- even in a can, because there may be no supermarket. Moreover, such items are costly.

Who wrote this nonsense?

11 posted on 06/12/2005 5:07:53 AM PDT by Bahbah (Something wicked this way comes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SIDENET

If we'd put money into feeding babies instead of PBS, NPR, and running concerts for Africa, we could definitely solve this problem.


12 posted on 06/12/2005 5:08:17 AM PDT by ReadyNow (When you see the eye, expect a lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

The problem is we don't serve dinner at school. We got breakfast and lunch in the bag. Plus, they have to be able to wander if there 365 days out of the year.
I can remember taking my lunch box to school, my mom made breakfast and dinner. An ice cream was a treat, maybe once a month. None of us were overweight.


13 posted on 06/12/2005 5:11:20 AM PDT by Bossy Gillis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: Libloather
Increasing numbers of young American children are showing signs of serious malnourishment, fueled by a greater prevalence of hunger in the United States, while, paradoxically, two-thirds of the US population is either overweight or obese.

Implying that two thirds of us gorge while the rest go hungry. When, in fact, the poor are MORE likely to be obese.

Some pediatricians worry that cuts in welfare aid proposed in President George W. Bush's 2006 budget will only exacerbate the situation. By contrast Bush plans to keep tax cuts for more affluent sectors of the population, they note.

Pediatricians say this? They sound pretty political for pediatricians.

"Recently I have been alarmed because we are getting more children who are so ill that they go to hospital rather than they come to the clinic first" a situation which, in 20 years of practising medicine, Frank had seen reverse.

Ummm...could it be that you can walk into a hospital and get treatment? I mean, how are parents medically qualified to know they should skip the clinic?

In some areas, green vegetables and fruit are impossible to buy -- even in a can, because there may be no supermarket. Moreover, such items are costly.

There are places in America with no food stores, and you can't buy a can of beans because it's too expensive? But you can buy an endless supply of fries and a Coke? Pff!

In some families, eating junk food will mean one child is obese while the other is underweight, said Black. "The first will eat junk food and nothing else, the second will eat junk food and everything else."

Wait...what? The kid who eats junk food and nothing else is fat. The kid who eats junk food and lots of other stuff is malnourished. They're both in the same household, but it's Bush's fault?

Dang. I'm sorry I read this one. My head hurts.

15 posted on 06/12/2005 5:13:45 AM PDT by prion (Yes, as a matter of fact, I AM the spelling police)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Some pediatricians worry that cuts in welfare aid proposed in President George W. Bush's 2006 budget will only exacerbate the situation. By contrast Bush plans to keep tax cuts for more affluent sectors of the population, they note.

Wow. You've got to hand it to 'em. They got it in in the third sentence. No pussy-footing around.

I read all the way through and never saw the part about parental responsibility. Did I just miss that?

16 posted on 06/12/2005 5:13:52 AM PDT by Allegra (OK, I'm Kind of Used to the Keyboard Now. My Typing Just Sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

17 posted on 06/12/2005 5:14:08 AM PDT by varyouga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I clicked on the link and saw that Yahoo News got the article from AFP (Agence France-Presse). I guess that even AP and Reuters weren't radical enough today, so they went trolling through French news.


18 posted on 06/12/2005 5:15:22 AM PDT by SIDENET ("You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
In some areas, green vegetables and fruit are impossible to buy -- even in a can, because there may be no supermarket.


19 posted on 06/12/2005 5:16:09 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReadyNow
we could solve this problem

I'm sorry, but I don't see any problem here. The guy who wrote this article doesn't know about WAL*MART. If you go into WAL*MART and they are selling some fruit for $4.99 a piece, then if you know a cheaper or better store where they are selling the same thing for $1.99, then just show them their advertisement and WAL*MART will bring its price down and you'll only have to pay $1.99! I SAY IT CAN'T GET ANY BETTER THAN THIS!

20 posted on 06/12/2005 5:16:20 AM PDT by blueberry12 (Americans are the most spoiled people on the face of the earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-162 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson