Skip to comments.
Possible Earth-like planet discovered
Houston Comical (AP) ^
| June 13, 2005, 2:14PM
Posted on 06/13/2005 12:42:00 PM PDT by The_Victor
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-124 next last
To: beltfed308
That's earth like? Relatively speaking, I guess.
21
posted on
06/13/2005 1:10:23 PM PDT
by
scott7278
(Before I give you the benefit of my reply, I'd like to know what we're talking about.)
To: Da Bilge Troll
I just can't believe that orbital period. It would have to be so close to the star that friction would quckly bring it down. This is a significant factor in the orbital period:
Gliese 876 is a small, red star with about one-third the mass of the sun.
22
posted on
06/13/2005 1:11:04 PM PDT
by
The_Victor
(Doh!... stupid tagline)
To: The_Victor
Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-Mars) will be green with envy (greener).
To: lilylangtree
"They estimated the surface temperature on the new planet at between 400 degrees and 750 degrees Fahrenheit"
24
posted on
06/13/2005 1:14:57 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
To: The_Victor
Yeah, but the question is who will the enviro-whacko's blame this case of Global Warming on?
25
posted on
06/13/2005 1:19:43 PM PDT
by
Tallguy
To: The_Victor
The planet is inhabited by nerdlings.
26
posted on
06/13/2005 1:19:51 PM PDT
by
GulliverSwift
(Just say no to McCain and Giulliani)
To: All
I'm curious if the gravity of a planet is affected by it's density. I know our gas giants aren't very dense yet they have extremely strong gravitational fields. Or is mass more of a factor than density?
27
posted on
06/13/2005 1:20:14 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(I zot trolls for fun and profit.)
To: Rummyfan
Hope not, that whole death penalty thing and all. We could be executed for just responding to this thread!
28
posted on
06/13/2005 1:22:48 PM PDT
by
waverna
To: Rummyfan
Is it Talos IV????? No, probably Gliese 876 I, unless there's another planet closer in to it's sun.
Posting from Sol III.
29
posted on
06/13/2005 1:23:15 PM PDT
by
El Gato
To: Rummyfan
30
posted on
06/13/2005 1:23:37 PM PDT
by
waverna
To: cripplecreek
Gravitational pull is purely a function of mass and distance.
31
posted on
06/13/2005 1:24:14 PM PDT
by
The_Victor
(Doh!... stupid tagline)
To: The_Victor
It's a terrestrial planet, but it sure ain't earthlike.
32
posted on
06/13/2005 1:26:07 PM PDT
by
Brett66
(Howard Dean - the gift that keeps on giving)
To: cripplecreek
I'm curious if the gravity of a planet is affected by it's density. Gravity's affected by the planet's mass. Density is the mass per unit of volume, so they are related. Remember, Saturn has a density of less than 1 (the density of water) while Earth's density is 5 and some change. However, Saturn has a higher "surface" gravity than Earth because it is so much bigger.
33
posted on
06/13/2005 1:27:56 PM PDT
by
Junior
(“Even if you are one-in-a-million, there are still 6,000 others just like you.”)
To: The_Victor
So a rocky planet the size of Jupiter would have the same gravitational pull as a gas giant like Jupiter?
34
posted on
06/13/2005 1:28:06 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(I zot trolls for fun and profit.)
To: cripplecreek
No. A rocky world that size (an impossibility) would be more massive than a gas giant and have a higher surface gravity.
35
posted on
06/13/2005 1:29:12 PM PDT
by
Junior
(“Even if you are one-in-a-million, there are still 6,000 others just like you.”)
To: BenLurkin
From the only good line in Riddick...."If I owned this place and Hell...I'd live in hell, and rent this place out."
To: cripplecreek
So a rocky planet the size of Jupiter would have the same gravitational pull as a gas giant like Jupiter? No. A rocky planet would have much greater mass that a gas planet of the same size.
37
posted on
06/13/2005 1:32:55 PM PDT
by
The_Victor
(Doh!... stupid tagline)
To: cripplecreek
I'm curious if the gravity of a planet is affected by it's density. I know our gas giants aren't very dense yet they have extremely strong gravitational fields. Or is mass more of a factor than density? The gravity field is dependent only on the mass. However the surface gravity is dependent on both the mass and the radius of the planet. The less dense planet will have a larger radius, by the cube root of the density ratio. It's surface gravity will be lower by the square of the cube root of the density ratio.
38
posted on
06/13/2005 1:36:34 PM PDT
by
El Gato
To: Steve_Seattle
Doesn't sound very "Earth-like" to me.By their standards it's almost a carbon copy. If it's solid, has an atmosphere and isn't hot enough to melt most metals it's pretty close. I blame bad reporting for the impressing they convey, because to a layman "earth like" means survivable without a spacesuit and the closest thing we have to that is Mars.
39
posted on
06/13/2005 1:38:42 PM PDT
by
Squawk 8888
(Proudly Christian since 2005)
To: cripplecreek
Gravity is directly proportional to mass. Density has nothing to do with the equation. Gas giants have high gravity because even though they aren't dense, there's a lot of mass involved.
40
posted on
06/13/2005 1:39:15 PM PDT
by
brownsfan
(Post No Bills)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-124 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson