Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Republicans should be spending their time explaining to the people how personal accounts work and what happens if they don't solve the SS problem.

Raising the retirement age is just more of their pyramid scheme -- there were some threads about how when it was originally introduced, the life expectancy was much lower, so they didn't have to pay out much and not for very long, but they were taking in plenty. They want to go back to the same model -- push the age to 100, why don't they, to make sure that 99% of the people will be dead, before qualifying -- that's where they are going with it. SS is by any other name is just another tax, unless they will allow people to have personal accounts, which was proven to be a great success in Chile.

1 posted on 06/14/2005 4:50:37 PM PDT by QQQQQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
To: QQQQQ

What difference does it make? I'm resigned to having to work the rest of my life anyway.


2 posted on 06/14/2005 4:51:45 PM PDT by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QQQQQ

When they stop giving illegals free hospitalization and every other benefit in the book, when they stop shipping billions of bucks overseas to buy the friendship of other countries, then they can raise the SS age to save money.


4 posted on 06/14/2005 4:53:34 PM PDT by Ciexyz (Let us always remember, the Lord is in control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QQQQQ

They should make it a 50% pension until 68.

People want to get A check, and start receiving support, even if it isn't 100%.

No check until 69 is a good way to put Democrats back in power.


5 posted on 06/14/2005 4:53:44 PM PDT by Finalapproach29er (America is gradually becoming the Godless,out-of-control golden-calf scene,in "The Ten Commandments")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QQQQQ
Key Senate Republicans are considering gradually raising the Social Security retirement age as high as 69

Names...I want names!

And, I want proof that the increase in age for full benefits also applies to the Senate's retirement plan!

Enough is enough.

9 posted on 06/14/2005 4:56:51 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QQQQQ

Oh, come on, you don't buy this bilge do you?

This is more of that "Republicans face chasm of ideology,
Democrats remain united in solidarity with middle class"
hogwash.


10 posted on 06/14/2005 4:56:52 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QQQQQ
Why don't key Senate Republicans privatize Social Security like we're electing and paying them to do? What good is a majority? Write, pass, enact the legislation we hired you to write, pass and enact, and stop whining to us like a bunch of sissy cry babies about why you can't.

Majority

11 posted on 06/14/2005 4:57:09 PM PDT by SittinYonder (Tancredo and I wanna know what you believe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QQQQQ

When they add the illegals to the role as they are talking about, the age will jump to at least 72, most likely 76 within 10 years.


12 posted on 06/14/2005 4:57:54 PM PDT by shellshocked (They're undocumented Border Patrol agents, not vigilantes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QQQQQ

Got a link for this story?


15 posted on 06/14/2005 5:00:38 PM PDT by SittinYonder (Tancredo and I wanna know what you believe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QQQQQ
Social Security was a bad idea from the start. Many Americans don't really believe in freedom. They only give it lip service. What they really want is socialism.

Reminds of that movie The Jerk. All I need is this gov't service and that gov't service....and this social security, and that medicare and that medicaid and that welfare and those perscription drugs, and those education dollars, and that money for art, and that money for endangered species, and this money for AIDS and that money for..........on and on endlessly. Other than that, they want freedom. Oh, of course THEY don't want to pay for any of it, but they want the RICH to pay.

16 posted on 06/14/2005 5:01:35 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QQQQQ

" push the age to 100, why don't they, to make sure that 99% of the people will be dead, before qualifying"

That's what FDR intended when he instituted SS, the medical profession should have to fund any shortage for creating the problem!


22 posted on 06/14/2005 5:06:20 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QQQQQ

Yup! Just like I said on another thread a while ago! They havent the grits to do whats right and privatise it so they will do what will have to be done to save the thing.

On that thread I said. They will have to raise the age to 70. Then they will have to cut benefits by half, raise the taxes by at least triple and cut spending by at least half.

Now we all know they are NOT gonna cut spending. So in order to "save" the system and pay off the IOUs coming due in a few years, they will raise ALL taxes (fed income as well as FICA) by at least triple to pay those IOUs and "save" the system. Then make us all work till 69-70-and soon 75 and 80 to help collect gelt they have stolen from the system.

They dont give a rip about us what in the hell are we kidding ourselves for?! They are addicted, and addicted to money. Fine thing, anyone under the age of 55 will have all that money stolen from them and never see one dam red cent.


23 posted on 06/14/2005 5:06:24 PM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QQQQQ

I resigned myself to the fact that i will never retire - just change what job I do - a long time ago. Republican's attempt to raise the retirement age is not a problem for me. What I object to is their attempt to delay the inevitable by this attempt. Again, I am disappointed in Republicans for not suppoerting President Bush's plan for SS and pushing for privatization accounts.


24 posted on 06/14/2005 5:06:28 PM PDT by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QQQQQ

Keep them working and make sure they die before we have to return any of their money to them. Heck of a scheme.


25 posted on 06/14/2005 5:06:38 PM PDT by Bahbah (Something wicked this way comes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QQQQQ
All of my working career I basically believed that I'd never see a dime of Social Security. It's now close enough that I actually pay attention.

Geez, I'd like it whenever they give it to me. It's more than I expected.

I still figure they'll find a way to make sure that I don't get back a fraction of what I've paid in.

28 posted on 06/14/2005 5:14:02 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QQQQQ
This is political suicide unfortuneatly. The Dims will eat their lunch on this. Private accounts are the only way to go.
30 posted on 06/14/2005 5:16:56 PM PDT by BnBlFlag (Deo Vindice/Semper Fidelis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QQQQQ
Damn, 69 I will have to wait a bit longer.

Perhaps the Social Security Department should start sending out free Marlboro's to everyone to cut back on expenses down the road.
31 posted on 06/14/2005 5:18:34 PM PDT by IronMan04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QQQQQ

Of course, if you are able to save and invest enough on your own, you can retire before the official SS retirement age if you have enough income from your investment. There's no rule that you can't retire before the "official" retirement age. You just can't start drawing that government check until then.


35 posted on 06/14/2005 5:22:24 PM PDT by .38sw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QQQQQ
fine and dandy for people that sit at a desk all day, twiddling their fingers....

what about the rest of us who are on our feet constantly and work extremely hard physically, emotionally and mentally ......

It will be disability for me, that's for sure.....

37 posted on 06/14/2005 5:25:08 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QQQQQ

i think when the dems controlled congress they did raise the retirement age in a tiered fashion.
i think i am suppose to work until 67 as is?

anyone remember or know?


40 posted on 06/14/2005 5:30:00 PM PDT by 537cant be wrong (vampires stole my lunch money but left me with my bus pass. damn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QQQQQ
Raising the retirement age is just more of their pyramid scheme -- there were some threads about how when it was originally introduced, the life expectancy was much lower, so they didn't have to pay out much and not for very long, but they were taking in plenty.

A partial examination of the facts is as dangerous as fabricating your facts. Consider, when the Social Security age was set; the average person was expected to die within a year or two of retirment. Medical science has come an unforseen growth, we can now cure a great many of the diseases that killed the elderly just 20 years ago.

Thus, we are not only living longer; our medical bills as we age have grown at a non-linear rate as well. Now, let's add to this mix of escalating medical costs, a larger percentage of the population reaching retirement age, and the expectation that most of us will reach the century mark.

Somethings gotta give. The population is in DECLINE (there are fewer workers, supporting each retiree). Does the gov't really have any choice?

50 posted on 06/14/2005 5:43:35 PM PDT by Hodar (With Rights, come Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson