Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FDA advisers endorse drug for blacks only
Atlanta Journal-Constitution ^ | 6-17-05 | Jeff Nesmith

Posted on 06/19/2005 7:13:19 AM PDT by Turbopilot

Gaithersburg, Md. — A panel of Food and Drug Administration advisers recommended Thursday that the agency license the heart failure medication BiDil for black patients only.

If the agency follows the 9-0 recommendation and licenses the drug, which could occur by next week, BiDil would become the first pharmaceutical targeted exclusively at a specific racial group.

The drug's manufacturer, NitroMed Inc. of Lexington, Mass., has presented the FDA with trial results that it says show a 43 percent reduction in mortality among black men and women who have had heart attacks. Only those who had experienced severe heart failure were tested.

The drug does not appear to be effective for white heart attack victims.

"This therapy is very powerful, and I have to vote to approve a drug that reduces mortality by 43 percent," said Cleveland Clinic cardiologist Steven Nissen, chairman of the FDA's Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee.

Because using the drug would lump African-Americans in a presumed genetic category, the proposed use of BiDil is controversial.

In a day of hearings at a motel in the Maryland suburbs of Washington, the committee heard occasionally impassioned arguments against the use of race as a "surrogate" for genetic differences.

Besides overtones of racial stereotyping that hung over the development of BiDil, some black scientists and others are concerned that approving a medication for a racial class could shortcut truly genetics-based medical research.

Black Americans, they point out, are descendants of people from a continent of great genetic diversity.

"Some people are offended by the whole idea [of a race-based drug for heart disease] and some are asking why don't we do it more?" said Dr. Robert Temple, acting director of the FDA's Office of Drug Evaluation.

As members of the panel voted to recommend the drug's approval, several said they were concerned that blacks have more than twice the rate of heart failure as whites.

Two members recommended that the FDA require the manufacturer to include a label stating the drug is licensed for use by blacks only.

In the trials leading up to the company's request for a license, patients were given BiDil in addition to standard heart attack drugs, such as beta blockers and ACE inhibitors. Research has indicated ACE inhibitors do not work as well in blacks as in whites.

"It increased survival by 43 percent in a population that was already on the best therapy available for congestive heart failure," Nissen said.

FDA advisory panels' decisions are not binding on the agency.

BiDil is the company's trade name for a combination of artery opening drugs developed by researchers at the University of Minnesota in the 1990s. It was turned down for an FDA license in 1996 on the grounds that clinical trials had failed to demonstrate it was effective.

However, when the Minnesota group analyzed the data from these trials, they said they noticed a marked racial difference in the way patients responded. It appeared that nearly half of the black patients had longer survival periods as a result of taking the drug.

A trial using about 1,000 black heart attack victims was organized, giving one group a placebo, along with customary ACE inhibitors and beta blockers.

The second group was given BiDil, as well as the traditional drugs.

The experiment was halted when a midtrial review indicated that 43 percent of the patients in the BiDil group were living longer.

It was deemed unethical to continue to deny other trial participants the benefits of the drug, sponsors said.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fda; health; heart
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Couldn't find this posted under searches for "FDA" or "drug". The idea that some people are "offended" by this drug makes me worry that the Sharpton/Jackson crew would actually fight this drug on the basis that it's better to let black people die than allow that they may have health issues different from those of other races.
1 posted on 06/19/2005 7:13:20 AM PDT by Turbopilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Turbopilot

Saying there are differences genetically is a ball of fire.
Jefferson would surely be reading and commenting on this.


2 posted on 06/19/2005 7:19:11 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Having read what he's said about black people in the past, I can only imagine what he'd say.


3 posted on 06/19/2005 7:20:56 AM PDT by cyborg (http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Turbopilot; neverdem

I am very curious as to whether these were tested on black Americans or just black people in general. Not all black people are the same and some people who call themselves black aren't even black.


4 posted on 06/19/2005 7:22:53 AM PDT by cyborg (http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Turbopilot

The PC crowd and Sharpton/Jackson race baiters would rather have Black people die than allow such a "racist" treatment. I'm surprised the researchers even had access to the data on the test subject's race.


5 posted on 06/19/2005 7:23:21 AM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Saying there are differences genetically is a ball of fire.

Well, saying there are genetic differences is trivial. Melanin concentrations are determined by genes. Saying that genetic differences go beyond the obvious is what's going to be controversial. I don't know enough about the science to comment on the likelihood, other than that a 43% success rate for blacks vs. a statistically insignificant change for other races seems to indicate the possibility. I just hope that black "leaders" don't sacrifice the health of their own people on the altar of political correctness.
6 posted on 06/19/2005 7:26:36 AM PDT by Turbopilot (Viva la Reagan Revolucion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...
Political correctness be damned. If it is a drug that can help people, make it available to help people. Period.

The conspiracy theorist in me wonders about exploitation on this sort of designation (if I can put my tin foil hat on for a moment).

Black conservative ping

If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)

Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.

7 posted on 06/19/2005 7:27:52 AM PDT by mhking (The world needs a wake up call gentlemen...we're gonna phone it in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Turbopilot
The idea that some people are "offended" by this drug makes me worry that the Sharpton/Jackson crew would actually fight this drug on the basis that it's better to let black people die than allow that they may have health issues different from those of other races.

Well duh!

8 posted on 06/19/2005 7:27:56 AM PDT by null and void (You will never be really good at anything you do just for the money...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyborg

Given that it was an FDA advisory committee and that the study in question was performed at the University of Minnesota, it seems reasonable to assume the test group consisted of Americans, and possibly Canadians.


9 posted on 06/19/2005 7:28:57 AM PDT by Turbopilot (Viva la Reagan Revolucion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Turbopilot

I hope it doesn't get overused as a lot of drugs are already. If this drug helps people, great.


10 posted on 06/19/2005 7:32:39 AM PDT by cyborg (http://mentalmumblings.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Turbopilot

The drug is a combo of Isorbide dinitrate and Hydralazine. Two long time commonly used Blood Pressure meds.


11 posted on 06/19/2005 7:34:58 AM PDT by tertiary01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tertiary01

I hit Post to soon, amend that to include vaso dilators too.


12 posted on 06/19/2005 7:40:25 AM PDT by tertiary01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Turbopilot
As I understood the test, it is efficacious for blacks because there were mostly only blacks in the test group.

But, if it is signficantly better for blacks than whites, Sharpton.Jesse won't fight IT, but will demand that more money (and jobs) be allocated to finding other drugs for blacks.

The racially unacceptable issue arrises only if money is wasted on a health issue that effects white men and a superior drug is found. The effort, itself, would get Sharpton's, well, blood pressure up.

The black racist thugs here, won't be upset by the medicine, but by some silliness like te study should have been done 10 years ago or "if they hired more black scientists, these black problems would be better addressed."

And, if you want to see Jesse, Sharpton and the step-n-fetchit Congressional Black Caucus watch and see should there be some yet unnoticed but nasty side effect of any drug touted as being for blacks!

13 posted on 06/19/2005 7:52:15 AM PDT by Tacis ( SEAL THE FRIGGEN BORDER!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Turbopilot
In a similar ruling, the FDA has prohibited sales of Viagra to attorneys, apparently it just makes them taller.
14 posted on 06/19/2005 7:54:04 AM PDT by gorush (Exterminate the Moops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Turbopilot

Let them protest - the test results came about as a result of a trial called A-HeFT - African-American Heart Failure Trial - where they were specifically testing this medication. They'll also be protesting groups such as the ABC (Association of Black Cardiologists), and members of the Congressional Black Caucus.

What's going to be really interesting will be what is done about pricing to begin with. Most new drugs hit the market as a non-preferred medication, with a significantly higher copay than preferred or generic medications. Since it's a combination of two already available generic medications, depending on the dosing, it may be less expensive to go ahead and get two RXs for the generics. Also, since it is targeting a specific group (like Zelnorm originally did), it may even require a prior authorization before you can get it filled. And of course, the benefits managers will be accused of being racist oppressors - but I've been called that before.


15 posted on 06/19/2005 7:54:27 AM PDT by Tennessee_Bob ("Nac Mac Feegle! The Wee Free Men! Nae king! Nae quin! Nae laird! We willna be fooled again!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Turbopilot
The 43% that are saved by this drug won't be complaining about the difference.
16 posted on 06/19/2005 8:07:57 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Mesocons for Rice '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Turbopilot
Minnesota ... you left out Scandinavians
17 posted on 06/19/2005 8:31:25 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (NEWSWEEK LIED, PEOPLE DIED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gorush
apparently it just makes them taller
LOL!!
18 posted on 06/19/2005 9:04:48 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Turbopilot
This is an interesting questions of ethics. If it has been demonstrated to be effective with black heart attack patients and there are no negative side effects, or at least only minimal; I don't think there is a problem. If there were some notable black scientists involved in the research and on the board that approved the drug, that would be rvrn better for appearance sake.

Hesitating to approve the drug might be viewed by some blacks as an attempt withold treatment that would save blacks. On the other hand, if actual results after the drug is approve result in more deaths, there might be a few who claim it is a plot to kill blacks.

19 posted on 06/19/2005 9:17:51 AM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
I have to agree with you on this one buddy this PC stuff is getting a bit to ludicrous.

I could understand a drug that would interact with say Sicle Cell Anemia [sp] but heart problems are general at best effecting almost everyone in some form or another !

20 posted on 06/19/2005 9:57:13 AM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK (secus acutulus exspiro ab Acheron bipes actio absol ab Acheron supplico)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson