Posted on 06/21/2005 4:53:47 PM PDT by F14 Pilot
NEW YORK (Reuters) -- Saddam Hussein, washes his hands compulsively and thinks fondly of the late U.S. President Ronald Reagan, according to American soldiers who guarded him and tell their story in the July issue of GQ magazine.
The jailed former Iraqi leader described how Reagan, who was president during the time of Iraq's 1980-88 war with Iran, sold him planes and helicopters.
"Reagan and me, good,'" Saddam said, according to the article by Lisa DePaulo in the July issue that goes on sale June 28.
"He said, 'I wish things were like when Ronald Reagan was still president,'" said one of the soldiers who guarded him.
The article recounts the stories of five U.S. soldiers from the Pennsylvania National Guard who watched over the captive for nearly a year..
President George W. Bush and his father, former President George H. W. Bush, are "no good," while former President Bill Clinton was "OK," Saddam told his captors. The former president led a UN-coalition that defeated Saddam in the 1991 Persian Gulf War after the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait.
PING!
Is this guy, like, nuts or what?
I don't know!
I bet he does. He never had it so good.
What's stopping us from putting a bullet in his head?
civilization.
So things don't get out of hand here. Do let us remember we sold him a bunch of small chopers, forget the model Bells, for commercial use. We did not sell him any planes. Nor ordnance or munitions to wage war with. Just to clear up any "cloud" that could enter someones mind as they read this barn stuff.
During the Reagan years, we didn't want Iran or Iraq winning the war between them. It wouldn't surprise me if we gave them enough intel or other minimal means of support to keep the balance. Keeping two destructive regimes busy, read that too busy to target others, is not such a bad idea.
Look what happened when Hussein was freed up after that war.
" I bet he does. He never had it so good."
Your sure right. He even has his own bucket to wash his underwear in. Guy got it made. Where's the rope.
Both Iran and IRaq are enemies of the United States.There are two factors.. If they are fighting each other they are not likely to have the ability to harm us. And as long as they are at war with each other both nations would have to pump all the oil they could to pay for the war. The more oil they pumped the cheaper gasoline was .. Remember 85 cent gasoline?
Reagan therefor had Ollie North doing the following. Help which ever side is losing at the moment. If Iraq is losing sell Saddam arms. If Saddam starts to win sell Iran arms to tip the balance.
Reagan was helping Iran as well as Iraq. He wwas helping whoever was losing at the momemt. Democratrs ending that policy is what Iran Contra was about.
I think it was a good policy. Helping your enemies kill each other is not a bad policy. And Saddam going after Iran was better than Saddam going after Kuwait and Saudi Arabia.
If that policy had been continued it is possible that a very long an difficult war could haved broght about the over throw of both the government of Iran and Iraq.
When enough soldiers have died in a fruitless winless war, the amries tend to turn on their Natioal leaders. If that had happened we woiuld be a lot better off today.
However the Democrats needed a scandal so they ran with Iran Contra.. AS a result we have to face the Mullahs still in power and we have lost over 2000 lives taking Saddam down with our troops.
Of course as soon as Saddam got out of the War with Iran he set up to capture Kuwait and Saudi. It cost us a bundle to reverse that and to prevent him from taking Saudi.
Imagine what wouild have happened if Saddam had Kuwait and Saudi.. Can you say 150 dollar a barrel oil and Saddam with Nukes purchased from the Russians pointed at the entire USA?
We may have sold him some stuff when Rumsfeld visited there, BUT FRANCE sold him stuff too.
Well at least he likes Reagan.
'I wish things were like when Ronald Reagan was still president,'
Hey those times were good for us too! Saddam is now officially smarter, in my book, than many American liberal Democrats..
That war did cost more than 1 milion people!
Yep, started by Saddam Hussein, it did cost 500 thousand of his citizen and Iranian citizens their lives. If Iraq or Iran had wone we'd have probably seen more elevated numbers than that.
Hussein's chemical attack on the kurds was reported to have cost hundreds of thousands of lives, I believe. And then he and his sons were probably directly or indirectly responsible for another 500 thousand or so deaths in Iraq.
The democrats blithely ignore this when they decry our entry into Iraq. Amazing.
right thing at the time? A relativistic conservative eh?
right thing at the time? A relativistic conservative eh?
Yup, Saddam, while not exactly a pal, was not on our hit list for a long time. If that nitwit Ambassador April Gasby (sic) hadn't given him the wrong idea about our interest in Kuwait, he might still have a job.
Reagan's record against the Islamic tide of terror was nothing less than abysmal.
If Hitler invaded hell I would make at least a favourable reference to the devil in the House of Commons.-Winston Churchill
This profile is designed to make the sheeple feel sorry for Saddam. He's a "regular guy" doncha know. Eats Cheetos and hates Froot Loops. Awww.....
"Yo Devil-Dog, we also supplied the Iraqis with much satellite and other intelligence during their war with Iran. It was the last gasp of classic trench warfare, so knowledge of what the Ayatollah's boys were up to, was crucial to the Iraqi's holding on. Yup, Saddam, while not exactly a pal, was not on our hit list for a long time. If that nitwit Ambassador April Gasby (sic) hadn't given him the wrong idea about our interest in Kuwait, he might still have a job."
Roger that to every word you said. Tis the truth. But I cannot accept the honor you eluded to of me being amoung the few and the proud.
I have a nephew LCpl in the 2nd LAR currently serving in northwest Al Anbar. So I will take the complement in behalf of him, and all his buddies.
Reagan's worst blunder was allowing the 241 Marines murdered by Iran-financed Hezbollah in Lebanon to go unavenged. It reinforced our "paper tiger" status, encouraging Islamists to believe we'd turn tail and run at the slightest sign of adversity.
Considering the fish Reagan did fry, I think you're being a little harsh here.
In Reagan's day you still had to deal with the Soviet Union, which backed Syria, and leaned to Iraq and Iran. I doubt the USSR would have backed Iran, but it probably would have made things quite difficult for us in the other two. Of course Iran may have asked for Russian aide to help it against us too.
The reality of facing off the USSR in Afghanistan by proxy meant that we had to train and arm freedom fighters. Unfortunately those were later to become Moslem extremist terrorists. Sometimes you can't win for losing.
What Bush has done today, was simply impossible during the Reagan years. With out a Soviet Colapse, we wouldn't even be able to do it today IMO.
"This profile is designed to make the sheeple feel sorry for Saddam. He's a "regular guy" doncha know. Eats Cheetos and hates Froot Loops. Awww....."
You got that right. And as another member commented, he now has a million wild flaming American feminists ready to tear him into pieces, for telling our men to find not to smart, not to dumb, women that know how to cook.
Heh heh, the jerk keeps this up and even some stupid commie demo's might turn on him. Of course perhaps that is a bit to much to ask of any Leninist or Troskite.
IMO, the biggest fiasco of that event after the fact, was that someone didn't stand for courtmartial. It was simply inexcusable for anyone to be able to get that close to the building. The guy in charge blew it.
Without that even taking place, Reagan wouldn't have needed to take action. Perhaps he should have sent a message, but as far as I am concerned his military command on the ground let him down big-time.
Completely agree.
Is the MSM playing this up either to continue smearing Reagan, to get Saddam sympathy from the Right, or to get the left to finally say something bad about Hussein?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.