Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ANITA HILL'S AFTER LIFE (Oprah's "no Chief Justice Clarence Thomas" campaign)
O Magazine (Oprah) ^ | July, 2005 | Elizabeth Mitchell

Posted on 06/21/2005 7:09:33 PM PDT by paulat

ANITA HILL'S AFTER LIFE
By Elizabeth Mitchell

In 1991 more than 20 million TV viewers watched as a well-regarded young law professor named Anita Hill accused her former boss, Clarence Thomas, of sexual harassment—and in return was smeared as a pathological liar, a would-be political assassin, and a prude. Thomas made it to the Supreme Court, and Hill vanished into academia—but not before changing the way we think about men and women in the workplace.

The Hearings

On October 11, 1991, the 35-year-old faced a grilling by 14 white male senators, many of them furious that she had delayed their march to confirm Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court. The topic was his alleged sexual harassment of her when she worked at the Department of Education and, later, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), but the tone of the hearings clearly implied that the Republican senators were out to prove her a liar. Carried by the networks and PBS over three days of near-continuous coverage, Hill's accounts of Thomas's describing the length of his penis and enjoying pornography involving animals reached more than 20 million American households. Beyond that, CNN carried the testimony worldwide to an audience so rapt, Hill has been recognized on the streets of South Africa and Bhutan.

[snip]

Even today, for many people Anita Hill is a hero.

[snip]

... in coming forward, Anita Hill was also branded everything from a delusional, bitter prude to a sexual deviant. Her home phone rang incessantly with death threats. Despite Hill's courage, Clarence Thomas went on to the Supreme Court, while she spent half of the next decade in agony.

(Excerpt) Read more at 2.oprah.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: anitahill; chiefjustice; clarencethomas; oprah; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: paulat
...Anita Hill accused her former boss, Clarence Thomas, of sexual harassment—and in return was smeared as a pathological liar, a would-be political assassin, and a prude.

As opposed to the way the left characterized Thomas?

21 posted on 06/21/2005 7:26:14 PM PDT by Half Vast Conspiracy (If their Chief of police is okay with it, I am guessing that we should probably be okay with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aunt Polgara
There weren't too many people who noticed that not a single person who knew both of them stuck up for Hill. They were all on Thomas' side. That said volumes to me.

Me too. Notice how the steamroller ran out of steam as the hearings wrapped up.

Biden left some other chick who said Thomas "harrassed" her cooling her heels in an ante room.

He was too embarrassed to call her to testify.

22 posted on 06/21/2005 7:29:46 PM PDT by sinkspur (If you want unconditional love with skin, and hair and a warm nose, get a shelter dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: paulat

the logic of the hearings was overrided by the feminist theatrics of television.

the tone was hysterical.

it reminded me of the communist theatre of antonin artaud and the street theater of the 1968 riots in france.


23 posted on 06/21/2005 7:29:48 PM PDT by ken21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Clarence Thomas isn't really black


24 posted on 06/21/2005 7:33:14 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (The market value of politeness is zero - traditional saying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
I don't think that she would go for Thomas, over Scalia; I'm sure that she would consider Thomas a race-traitor.

The Raisch case bears witness - Thomas is a much bigger threat to the proponents of "living document" jurisprudence than Scalia. The liberals would hate Thomas if he was lime green with purple polkadots.

25 posted on 06/21/2005 7:33:17 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
Exactly. My attempt at humor failed (hey, it's happened before ...) but my point was that the Left has pretty much said that Thomas is not Black, because he is not a Leftist. I think it's amusing that both Anita Hill and Oprah could be crticized the same way "Oppose Thomas?? You must not be REALLY black" It's a stupid, insulting, and condescending thing to say.

Conservatives never talk like that. But Leftists say that stuff all the time. They said it about Thomas. They said it about Bush's judicial nominees. It's disgusting.

26 posted on 06/21/2005 7:38:08 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: paulat; Mrs Zip; BOBWADE
Even today, for many people leftist,Godless anti Americans, Anita Hill is a hero.

Just thought I would clear it up a little.

27 posted on 06/21/2005 7:46:51 PM PDT by zip (Remember: DimocRat lies told often enough became truth to 48% of Americans (NRA))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
My attempt at humor failed

No, it didn't. I understood exactly where you were saying.

28 posted on 06/21/2005 7:53:22 PM PDT by zip (Remember: DimocRat lies told often enough became truth to 48% of Americans (NRA))))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

OU President Boren finally got rid of Anita Hill from the OU Law faculty. He was one of President Bush's point men in the Senate for the Thomas' nomination and when David Boren resigned from the Senate to become President of OU (after Clinton was elected), he set out to oust Hill from the faculty which he did. Then he sent back the money that was given for an endowed chair for Hill refusing to do matching funding for an Anita Hill Chair in the Law School.

Hill complained that Boren didn't like her, wouldn't talk to her at receptions, and wanted her gone -- one thing she got right! Not many tears shed in Norman when she left the Tulsa branch of the OU Law School where she had been moved by Pres Boren.


29 posted on 06/21/2005 8:04:02 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- J.C. for OK Governor; Allen in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: All

I wonder what you all think about how effective a "revival" of Anita Hill would be in this post-Bubba world?


30 posted on 06/21/2005 8:07:52 PM PDT by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: paulat

I suppose Bill Clinton is Dems' ideal for appropriate behavior in the workplace as far as men and women are concerned.


31 posted on 06/21/2005 8:17:08 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulat
"—but not before changing the way we think about men and women in the workplace."

No she didn't. It was simply a political attack. And I can prove this in only two words: Bill Clinton. Yup, there we saw NOW and Anita Hill's concern about sexual harassment in the workplace, the attempt by a powerful man to intimidate a women out of her day in court and his attempt to lie his way out of the consequences of his behaviour. We saw all the liberals, all the women's groups and all the Democrats rally around the underdog women in her unequal battle against the privileged and powerful. NOT!

I wish the Republicans had had the balls to try to repeal the sexual harassment laws, just as I now wish they had the balls to repeal another liberal, elite "reform", ie McCain-Feingold. Both were not enough against powerful, rich, elite, Democrat Liberals. If they're not enforced against them, it's unfair to enforce them against the non-powerfu, non-rich, non-elite, non-Democrats.

32 posted on 06/21/2005 8:54:07 PM PDT by Jabba the Nutt (Jabba the Hutt's bigger, meaner, uglier brother.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Ooooh .. You're good .. do you do other impersonations ..??


33 posted on 06/21/2005 8:57:51 PM PDT by CyberAnt (President Bush: "America is the greatest nation on the face of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jabba the Nutt
I wish the Republicans had had the balls to try to repeal the sexual harassment laws

They won't because they have wives and daughters.

34 posted on 06/21/2005 9:02:19 PM PDT by paulat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

I'm not really an impersonator, I just play one on F.R. Hey wait, isn't that impersonating? I'm confused...


35 posted on 06/21/2005 9:03:48 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

YOU confused .. never happen!


36 posted on 06/21/2005 10:48:32 PM PDT by CyberAnt (President Bush: "America is the greatest nation on the face of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

LOL No, it does happen. I just try to hide it well. Key word, 'try'...

Have a good night.


37 posted on 06/21/2005 10:53:44 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: paulat

Anita Hill and Feminist Majority Foundation President Eleanor Smeal

******

Monicagate: Time and again, prominent feminists have declined to condemn Clinton or have said explicitly that his pro-choice policies or his appointments of women to Cabinet positions matter far more than his regrettable tendency to drop trou and demand oral sex from women both willing and unwilling. “We’re trying to think of the big picture, think about what’s best for women,” Eleanor Smeal, the president of the Feminist Majority Foundation, told Vanity Fair’s Marjorie Williams in May.

Eleanor Smeal, president of The Feminist Majority, said Lewinsky will always take care of herself. "She had a tough year, but she will do fine," she said. "Lewinsky is a modern woman. She knew what she wanted, and to a degree, she got it. She'll go on doing that."

******

38 posted on 06/21/2005 11:05:02 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paulat

FEBRUARY 4, 1999 6:19 PM
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Feminist Majority
Justine Andronici, 703-522-2214


National Women's Leaders Oppose Live Testimony At Senate Trial; Statement of Eleanor Smeal, President of the Feminist Majority

WASHINGTON - February 4 -

I am proud to join today with national women's leaders and leading women members of Congress to urge the United States Senate to put an end to this spectacle of hypocrisy and travesty of justice. The 13 House managers want to subject Monica Lewinsky and the American public to live testimony on the floor of the Senate. This woman has been forced to offer the same testimony, and the same facts 23 times. Enough is Enough.

The house managers are showing their true Religious Right colors. In this last ditch attempt to save face, they have once again demonstrated by their statements and actions that they are out of touch with the American people - especially American women.

As leaders in the national women's rights movement, we have known for some time just how out of touch these Republican House managers are-- and now, at last, so will the nation. Their blatant disregard for public opinion in this matter is no surprise. Time and time again, Henry Hyde and the other managers have ignored the public's overwhelmingly pro-women's rights and pro-choice views, and now they are ignoring the public once again. It is interesting to note that even during this impeachment trial several House managers, including Henry Hyde, have spoken of their opposition to abortion. The out-of-touch behavior of the 13 House managers in this impeachment trial has done more to reveal the dominance of the Religious Right in the Republican Party than the thousands of anti-choice and anti-women's rights votes cast by Congressmen such as Henry Hyde, and his band of twelve.

Feminist leaders spoke early and often in opposition to the impeachment of the President. And today we have a message for the managers -- it seems they need reminding. The American people, especially women, are not with you. We do not want this trial to continue. It is time to GIVE IT UP.

Note: Feminist Majority President, Eleanor Smeal joined other national women's rights leaders and women members of the US Congress today to oppose live witness testimony in the Senate Impeachment trial of President Clinton. Smeal was joined by Patricia Ireland, President of the National Organization for Women; Dr. Yvonne Scruggs Leftwich, Executive Director, Black Leadership Forum; Dorothy Height, President Emeritus, National Council of Negro Women; Dr. Ramona H. Edelin, President, National Urban Coalition and interim Executive Director of the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation; Lina Frescas Dobbs, Executive Director, Wider Opportunities for Women; Dr. Martha Burk, Center for the Advancement of Public Policy


39 posted on 06/21/2005 11:05:59 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery

January 28, 1998

Linda Chavez

Clinton, Lewinsky, and Politics vs. principle

Patricia Ireland, Eleanor Smeal, Anita Hill, call your office. The most important sexual harassment case in U.S. history is unfolding in Washington, and the leaders of the National Organization for Women, the Feminist Majority and the National Women's Political Caucus are nowhere to be found. Monica Lewinsky, who has accused President Clinton of engaging her in a year-and-a-half long exploitive and demeaning sexual relationship, is very much in need of some sisterly support.


40 posted on 06/21/2005 11:08:30 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson