Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Thought this might be of interest to some here; but what I found interesting is within this site of rare newspapers; one can read the reaction to important events in history-Revolutionary War, Civil War etc.

I thought a peruse of some of these newspapers (the above recently required) might hold some "feeling" of the time in which these historical events took place. Interesting papers for a parallel news read.

Old news, but still timely.

1 posted on 06/22/2005 2:30:43 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: All

http://www.rarenewspapers.com/ HOME INDEX LINK


2 posted on 06/22/2005 2:33:13 PM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fight_truth_decay

Don't ever let anyone tell you that jefferson was a deist, or atheist. He was a Christian Unitarian who prayed to God for divine intervention in daily life.

It should also be understood that Baptists led the charge for religious freedom and the Bill of Rights.


3 posted on 06/22/2005 2:40:41 PM PDT by Mark Felton ("I am a real Christian...a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus." -- Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fight_truth_decay
Why can't Free Republic, in the "unanimous" mode (per Jorge Louis Borges definition) acquire this old newspaper?

I'm in for $10.

We can make a fascimile for sale to enthusiasts and recover most of the investment.

4 posted on 06/22/2005 2:41:00 PM PDT by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are ignorance, stupidity and hydrogen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fight_truth_decay

Note that Jefferson did not contemplate "hate" crimes. Acts not opinions. I wonder if the ACLU will pursue that one very far?


5 posted on 06/22/2005 2:41:15 PM PDT by Whispering Smith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fight_truth_decay

Jefferson's letter is just that, a letter. He was not involved in the constitutional convention, and had nothing to do with the Bill of Rights -- being in France on both occasions. His letter was written 14 years after the Bill of Rights were adopted. And several of the states ratifying the Bill of Rights actually had official state religions. I am not obviously not arguing for a return to that, but the point is that if today's "separation of church and state" viewpoint existed back then, the Bill of Rights never would have been ratified by the states, including the states that had official religions. And a few days after writing this letter, Jefferson went to the House of Representatives for morning prayer, as he did frequently as president. But this is, nonetheless, a fascinating link.


6 posted on 06/22/2005 2:41:23 PM PDT by holdonnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fight_truth_decay
...that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions,...

Except 'hate crimes' of course. /sarc

7 posted on 06/22/2005 2:43:22 PM PDT by nosofar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fight_truth_decay
Very timely, very relevant, and will probably be very misunderstood or misused. It's clear that the founding fathers includinbg Jefferson included Christianity and God in just about every political thing they did. The issue in their minds was never that church or relgion is a threat to the state but state was a clear threat to freedom of religious expression, hence the 1st Amendment. The liberals will always wrest the intended meaning of this.
9 posted on 06/22/2005 2:46:55 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fight_truth_decay
hat the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions,

Unless, of course, you commit a "hate" crime.

11 posted on 06/22/2005 2:48:22 PM PDT by wizardoz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lepton

bookmark bump


13 posted on 06/22/2005 2:58:16 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fight_truth_decay
You might be interested to know that the Madison Building of the Library of Congress has an extensive collection of colonial and revolutionary newspapers on microfilm. I've read about half that collection, and published excerpts from them in articles. Bottom line -- those newspapers were bold, brassy and opinionated. They were more like the tabloids today, than any other type of current newspapers.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "Say It Isn't So, Dickie Boy"

17 posted on 06/22/2005 3:10:33 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Anyone who takes the MSM seriously, deserves the likes of Dick Durbin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fight_truth_decay
Thought this might be of interest to some here

You thought correctly and thank you for posting this. It contains not one bit of information that I did not already know. However, to see what I know validated by the original document gives me a very comforting feeling, and a few shivers. I once visited St. John's Church in Richmond, Virginia where the Second Virginia Convention convened on 20 March 1775. I stood on the exact spot on the very same wooden floor timbers that Patrick Henry had stood on 23 March 1775 when he delivered that famous speech. That also gave me shivers.

27 posted on 06/22/2005 3:48:09 PM PDT by MosesKnows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fight_truth_decay
So the MSM is taking statements from the MSM of 100 years ago and calling it constitutional ?

I can only hope that future Americans, 100 years hence, don't start quoting Dick Turbin or John McCain.

28 posted on 06/22/2005 3:52:46 PM PDT by ChadGore (VISUALIZE 62,041,268 Bush fans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fight_truth_decay
Why can't understand that all Jefferson was against was an "Established church". He wanted to get away from the British system, i.e. the CHURCH OF ENGLAND, whereby one church got funding from the state and all others were against the law or discriminated against.

He was also against the idea that you had to be a member of the established church to vote or hold office.

Thats it. He wasn't against prayer in school, or reading the bible in school, or any of the other unchristian crap the ACLU and the SCOTUS have thought of in the last 50 years.

Massachusetts had an established church - which was given money by the state government - until 1845.
31 posted on 06/22/2005 4:46:56 PM PDT by rcocean (Copyright is theft and loved by Hollywood socialists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

later pingout for sure.


37 posted on 06/22/2005 7:05:55 PM PDT by little jeremiah (A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson