Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court's Kelo Decision Trashes Taxpayer Rights as Well as Property Rights, Citizen Group Says
usnewswire.com ^ | 6/23/2005 1:13:00 PM | U.S. Newswire

Posted on 06/23/2005 4:06:04 PM PDT by Destro

Supreme Court's Kelo Decision Trashes Taxpayer Rights as Well as Property Rights, Citizen Group Says

6/23/2005 1:13:00 PM

To: National Desk

Contact: Pete Sepp or Annie Patnaude, 703-683-5700, both of the National Taxpayers Union

ALEXANDRIA, Va., June 23 /U.S. Newswire/ -- The U.S. Supreme Court's narrow 5-4 ruling in the Kelo v. City of New London case today has wide implications for taxpayers, not just property owners, according to the 350,000-member National Taxpayers Union (NTU), a non-partisan citizen group that filed a "friend of the court" brief in the case on behalf of the homeowners. John Berthoud, President of NTU, offered the following reaction on the heels of the decision:

"By giving governments a green light to bulldoze citizens' homes in the name of development schemes that supposedly promise higher revenues, the Supreme Court is also granting politicians a license to trample on overburdened taxpayers. Property rights have always been inseparable from taxpayer rights, which is why this ruling is one of the most shocking setbacks for economic freedom and limited government in a decade.

Within hours of this decision being issued, overreaching bureaucrats and their political allies around the country began declaring victory on behalf of subsidized development schemes that will not only cost citizens the residences and businesses they worked hard to build, but will also cost taxpayers the money they worked hard to earn. From shopping malls to sports stadiums, the Court has unjustly given its blessing to many crony-capitalist projects that depend more heavily on public funding than free-market principles to succeed.

Justice O'Connor was absolutely right when she pointed out that the beneficiaries of this ruling 'are likely to be those with disproportionate power and influence in the political process.' Even the majority of Justices acknowledged that states are free to enact restrictions on eminent-domain power grabs. At least these two facts give taxpayers hope, and give NTU a mission. As an organization that has fought back against big government for 35 years, we will not surrender our property rights or taxpayer rights because of this ruling. We the people will take back the Fifth Amendment, state by state, community by community, if necessary."

NTU was founded in 1969 to work for lower taxes and smaller government at all levels. In addition to joining an amicus brief with eight other groups on behalf of the property owners in Kelo, NTU also signed an October 2004 coalition letter from over 40 organizations urging the Bush Administration to "affirm its support for property rights and refrain from filing a brief in Kelo." Note: Copies of the brief and the letter are available online at http://www.ntu.org.

http://www.usnewswire.com/

-0-

/© 2005 U.S. Newswire 202-347-2770/


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: kelo; ntu; scotus; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: Destro

They are only allowing us to retain our firearms legally for right now to keep people calm. That will be taken away from us soon as well, within my lifetime. The US will fall within 100 years if things don't change. And that is the truth, I feel sorry for my kids.


21 posted on 06/23/2005 5:49:40 PM PDT by vpintheak (Liberal = The antithesis of Freedom and Patriotism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vpintheak

Here is a case for a citizen's militia to guard this man's home and live up to Jefferson's words.


22 posted on 06/23/2005 5:52:36 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: shellshocked

Your not the only one "shellshocked" by this ruling


23 posted on 06/23/2005 7:18:20 PM PDT by apackof2 (In my simple way, I guess you could say I'm living in the BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Destro

When will a group of people say "We've had it. We will take a stand here. They must jail or kill the lot of us but we will not budge."

They said that at the Alamo and they were immortalized and inspired others to fight even harder. Jefferson's quote about blood watering the tree of liberty from time to time comes to mind here. It's either toads in boiling water or ..?


24 posted on 06/23/2005 7:20:12 PM PDT by enviros_kill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mears
STEVENS, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which KENNEDY, SOUTER, GINSBURG, and BREYER, JJ., joined. KENNEDY, J., filed a con-curring opinion. O’CONNOR, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which REHNQUIST, C. J., and SCALIA and THOMAS, JJ., joined. THOMAS, J., filed a dissenting opinion.

The usual supects on this decision

Is it Christian to despise the wolf-in-sheep's-clothing Souter?

25 posted on 06/23/2005 7:28:39 PM PDT by apackof2 (In my simple way, I guess you could say I'm living in the BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: apackof2

Stunned, just simply stunned. Angry, too.


26 posted on 06/23/2005 7:33:09 PM PDT by shellshocked (Rule 308 trumps all other judges rulings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Mears

Without a doubt this is a deadly grab for power. The basis of a free society is the ownership of property. If that is further eroded then there is no freedom.

The basis of a capitalistic society is freedom to own and do with your own property what you want. God, in setting up the only society he set up, Israel, made it clear that property ownership had to be unalienable. There is no freedom outside of the ownership of property.

I can see these vultures licking their chops and getting ready to pounce. There is no place in the US now where your property rights are sacred. It reminds me of the Dred Scott decision that made all of the USA a slave state.

My 13 year old son asked me today, "If we have to pay taxes on our property after it is paid for, do we really own it dad?"

How is it that children can see through this scheme and not these "wise" judges. This is final proof of a extreme liberal court. They have taken out of our society the final cornerstone of freedom, and the rest will fall soon behind it. God help our children.


27 posted on 06/23/2005 7:53:49 PM PDT by TrailofTears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Destro

Corporatism as described has a very close cousin. It's called FASCISM.


28 posted on 06/23/2005 8:18:24 PM PDT by FierceDraka (The Democratic Party - Aiding and Abetting The Enemies of America Since 1968)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Interesting to read about corporatism in your post.

I believe that the correct approach toward campaign finance reform would be to disallow corporate donations to political campaigns. Corporations political influence should be limited to appealling directly to the people and convince them to vote in their favor. The constitution was written for the individual, not corporate entities.

Today's ruling allows for developers to buy political candidates and for candidates to repay with private property of the people.

I vote for civil war.

29 posted on 06/23/2005 8:48:26 PM PDT by Nephi ("I am in favor of free trade." - Karl Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: enviros_kill
If we take the toad analogy - When Dems are in office and do wrong by our conservative sensibilities it is as if a toad is placed in already boiling water - the toad leaps out in a flash - when Republicans are in office we toads are in the water as it begins to boil and we don't notice it because our sensitive nervous system can not perceive the boiling.
30 posted on 06/23/2005 9:26:38 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TrailofTears
Israel, made it clear that property ownership had to be unalienable.

Which is whay a big deal was made in the Old Testament about purchasing your burial ground, etc.

31 posted on 06/23/2005 9:27:43 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TrailofTears
This is final proof of a extreme liberal court.

This is not true lefty hippie liberalism - since they despise business which this ruling helps - this is Statisim - power of the state and state interest over the people. But I understand what you are saying. The political meanings have all blended and become meaningless these last 12 years.

32 posted on 06/23/2005 9:30:23 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rmmcdaniell

Congress can pass laws relating to federal eminent domain actions but most eminent domain actions are done by state and local authorities. Federal legislation will not affect this. You need to check your state and see how its constitution and laws stack up. If they allow too much eminent domain power in government (as Connecticut's apparently do), pressure your state legislators to fix the problem.


33 posted on 06/23/2005 9:32:36 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Nephi

If any cause (to protect this man's private property) should muster a citizen's militia - by God! - this is the cause.


34 posted on 06/23/2005 9:32:57 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Destro

All that's left to fight for is Christian libertarianism in my opinion. The absolute best blueprint for a society based on this is described in "Molon Labe" by Boston T. Party. It's Free State Project in Wyoming with Christian overtones. They have started moving there.

Get Molon Labe for the lowest price here:
http://www.fredsm14stocks.com/catalog/books.asp

Read some great reviews here:
http://www.intellectualconservative.com/article3335.html
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1090700/posts


35 posted on 06/23/2005 9:58:08 PM PDT by enviros_kill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: enviros_kill
I am not going to run and play survivalist - yet.
36 posted on 06/23/2005 10:01:16 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting johnathangaltfilms.com and jihadwatch.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: apackof2

This is one decision we could get changed if one of these die or retire in the next couple years...Souter, Kennedy, Ginsberg, Breyer, Stevens.

Campaign Finance Reform is nothing next to this.


37 posted on 06/23/2005 10:30:37 PM PDT by patriciaruth (They are all Mike Spans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth

I agree, this one ranks up there with Dred Scott and Roe.


38 posted on 06/23/2005 10:33:22 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

Is there anyone in the gang of five that might be close to giving it up?

It's Rehnquist and O'Conner that have been touted as maybe retiring.


39 posted on 06/23/2005 10:36:31 PM PDT by patriciaruth (They are all Mike Spans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth

Stevens is pretty old and Ginsberg has been ill but I wish her God speed with the battle she had with cancer. Souter and his pal aren't going anywhere. The execrable Justice Kennedy will be around long enough to cause me many more bouts with angina before the big one hits.


40 posted on 06/23/2005 10:47:05 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson