1 posted on
06/25/2005 5:38:14 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
Here we go. The lunatics on the Supreme Court have ensured that the state now has the ability to enrich itself by seizing valuable land and property.
Something has to be done about this socialist, anti-American nonsense.
To: BenLurkin
Love these Gov. on Gov. fights until I realize that the taxpayer gets a double 'bend over' from the attorneys.
3 posted on
06/25/2005 5:47:23 PM PDT by
ncountylee
(Dead terrorists smell like victory)
To: BenLurkin
Hospitals stand on prime real estate virtually everywhere in
the nation. The possibilities are endless...eeesh.
4 posted on
06/25/2005 5:48:04 PM PDT by
NautiNurse
("I'd rather see someone go to work for a Republican campaign than sit on their butt."--Howard Dean)
To: BenLurkin
Brace yourselves mateys. The wind has hardly started to pick up yet. Of course if you are fortunate to live in an area that could not be bulldozed into parking lots and shopping centers guess you can rest easy. I saw this very thing happen some 15 years back just north of Allentown PA. Nothing the owner could do, but finally sell out their large farm. So that a strip mall could be put in. It has been going on a lot more then we tend to realize.
6 posted on
06/25/2005 5:50:13 PM PDT by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned)
To: BenLurkin
Adams said the offer is a legal formality that must be carried out prior to instituting an eminent-domain action. It's supposed to be a "good faith attempt to acquire the property under regular negotiations."The city can offer me abou 2/3 of what my home is worth as a "legal formality" the institute eminent-domain to acquire tie property. Later they can resell it with the profit they make going to pay city wage increases. The USSC is OK with this. As long as I am a nobody, the local politicians and city workers would love it.
8 posted on
06/25/2005 5:53:59 PM PDT by
JimSEA
To: BenLurkin
The Mafia stands to make a mint on the SCOTUS decision. After all they are the ones with all the experience in extortion, bribing public officials, rackateering, etc. Soon they will be making you an offer you can't refuse.
12 posted on
06/25/2005 6:03:23 PM PDT by
SC DOC
To: BenLurkin
1 mil an acre seems like a lot to me in that God forsaken place known as Palmdale.
13 posted on
06/25/2005 6:04:12 PM PDT by
Torie
(Constrain rogue state courts; repeal your state constitution)
To: BenLurkin
Weder referred to eminent domain as "a discussion alternative. It's not something we're doing at this point. It's an option. No decision has been made." Weder said once the health-care district hears Palmdale's response, then they'll "take it from there and see what (their) next steps will be."
Cold blooded. This will really screw things up. Thanks Supreme Soviet!
21 posted on
06/25/2005 6:45:25 PM PDT by
TheSpottedOwl
(Free Mexico!...End Black Collar Crime)
To: BenLurkin
OK, I wonder what the Communist Mayors Council that came out praising the SCOTUS action to the skies, will have to say when larger (state) agencies begin stuffing their own medicine down their throat? Or better yet when the Fedguv does it?
30 posted on
06/25/2005 9:42:27 PM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
To: BenLurkin
At every level- state, county, city - there must be citizen-based pressure to renounce the use of these broad powers.
Won't happen every politician is drunk with power.
33 posted on
06/26/2005 6:23:58 AM PDT by
pointsal
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson