[neodad]

Bush Lied!

[nwrep]

Ping

[agere_contra]

Interesting. Thanks for posting.

[grobdriver]

The threat posed by Iraq and its arsenal of chemical and biological weapons is just too serious to set aside for another diplomatic accomodation.

BWAHAHAHAHAhahahahahaha! ! ! ! Rub their face in it dittos!

[jdm]

Good find. Thanks.

"NYT Editorial: The threat posed by Iraq and its arsenal is too serious for diplomacy"

Only during a Democrat presidency would you see such a headline from the MSM.

[rhombus]

Can't we get the whole editorial or is that something the NY Times thinks we should have to pay for?

[God luvs America]

can I ask how you find these???

[Obadiah]

To do nothing in the face of Iraq defiance will only embolden Mr. Hussein. The last time he believed the world was indifferent, he invaded Kuwait.

Oh, yeah, things have now changed...a Republican is in office.

[Grampa Dave]

Excellent find.

[Grampa Dave]

fyi

[Grampa Dave]

fyi

[Grampa Dave]

fyi and ping list

[maryz]

Great find! Thanks for posting.

[Grampa Dave]

Doug, you can probably take this to Burger King, re type and then fax it from Kinko's to Howard Dean.

[roses of sharon]

This is the lost decade!! These bastards act as if the 90's never happened.

All so they can claim Bush lied.

Frightening how the MSM can change history in a matter of 2 years.

[rabidralph]

Thanks, for all of your posts this past week, chronicling news reports in support of military action in Iraq, under direction of the Clinton Administration.

[jcb8199]

Thanks for the find!

[rhombus]

Of course there is this which Democrats will jump on:

"The Iraq crisis is neither more nor less than that. It is not about removing Mr. Hussein from power, as much as Republican Congressional leaders would like to see that outcome of this latest confrontation. Handing millions of dollars to the Central Intelligence Agency to unseat Mr. Hussein, doubtless a popular notion in Congress, has not worked before and is not likely to work now because the Iraqi opposition is splintered and weak."

The NY Times loves to keep despots in power and removing them is just a "popular notion" of those crazy Republicans. Show this to any liberal and they will focus on the fact that the NY Times said that Hussein should not be removed. and they'll ignore the rest of the editorial.

[SuziQ]

Seem the opinions of the Old Grey Lady depend solely on which political party occupies the White House.

[rollo tomasi]

'The paper of record' needs to be changed to 'The paper of hypocrites and liars'.