Posted on 07/01/2005 12:13:05 PM PDT by mbarker12474
Local minister placed on involuntary leave
Refusal to admit homosexual as member an issue
By Mike Bollinger
Staff Writer
SOUTH HILL - A controversial national issue has made its presence felt in the local area as a South Hill minister has been placed on "involuntary leave of absence" after refusing to admit a homosexual member to his church.
The Rev. Edward Johnson of South Hill United Methodist Church has been placed on a one-year, unpaid leave, according to the Rev. W. Anthony Layman, district superintendent for the Petersburg District of the Virginia Conference of the United Methodist Church.
"The pastor has been placed on an involuntary leave of absence by the board of ordained ministry after a vote in executive session," Layman said Monday.
A congregation member said Monday that Layman along with Bishop Charlene P. Kammerer visited South Hill Methodist Sunday and explained the situation to the congregation.
Layman would make no comment Monday other than to say Johnson has been placed on leave. Associate Pastor Lee Warren also declined to comment further Monday. No church officials would speak on the record about why Johnson was placed on leave.
Gary Creamer, a member of South Hill UMC, said Monday that the sexual preference of the prospective member was the reason for Johnson's being placed on leave. Creamer said he echoed the opinion of many other members concerning Johnson.
"I feel Rev. Johnson was holding to Biblical principle in denying membership to that individual," Creamer said. "I feel extremely sad and grieved. I feel a terrible injustice was done."
Creamer said he has not yet decided whether he will continue to attend the church.
"I haven't made up my mind whether to leave or to stay and be a part of the loyal opposition," he said.
The decision to place Johnson on leave was made, Creamer believes, without taking into account the feelings of the local congregation. Church members were "completely excluded" from the process, he said.
"I just feel like the congregation as a whole was ignored," he said. "I don't think anyone had any idea of the gravity of what was going on."
Creamer said he did not believe the church would react in such a harsh way in response to Johnson's actions.
Reached for comment Monday, Kammerer would not comment on the details of Johnson's leave. To do so, she said, would violate his confidentiality.
She said the United Methodist Church is guided by the Book of Discipline, which is reviewed globally by elected delegates every four years. Any portion of that book may be amended during these reviews, she said.
Over the last 30 years, the United Methodist Church has consistently maintained the prohibition of ordination of gay clergy, Kammerer said. However, that prohibition does not apply to church membership.
"In regard to membership in the United Methodist Church of laypersons, homosexuality has not been prohibited as a reason for not accepting someone," she said.
Kammerer said if Johnson meets terms provided for him while on leave, he would be reinstated as a United Methodist minister in good standing. In all probability, he would be reassigned to another church, she said.
"He would be eligible for reappointment, regardless of where it is," she said.
Layman will meet with the staff-parish committee, the local church personnel committee, this week and begin work on providing an interim pastor for South Hill UMC, Kammerer said.
"He will tell them who that person is and why they are a good match. The committee commented that an interim pastor would be a good request, and we will work toward that," she said.
Clergy matters are not subject to input from local congregations, according to Kammerer. She said they are handled in executive session by the board of ordained ministers, as was done in this case.
"He is accountable to the annual conference as a clergy member. He is not subject to any one local church," she said.
The process has been ongoing for approximately four months, Kammerer said.
"As Rev. Johnson's bishop, I wish he and his family well and pray for healing in the life of the congregation in South Hill," she said.
Creamer said the individual in question had been worshipping at the church for some time and was singing in the choir.
"This person was never discouraged from coming to church. That would be un-Christian. However, actual membership would be another story," he said.
The congregation, Creamer said, found about the decision late last week. The decision was made by a vote taken at the Virginia Annual Conference in Hampton last week, he added.
The Rev. Johnson and the person who sought admission to the church, along with Denny Hardee, the chairman of the church's staff-parish committee, and several other church members were all contacted in connection with this story. All chose not to comment.
Homosexual Agenda Ping.
Very interesting situation with a lot of insight and knowledge on the thread. Of course, the article isn't totally clear with details - for instance, was the homosexual who was denied membership in the church a repentent, non-practicing homosexual? Or a celebratory, "accept me as I am" homosexual? And he was allowed to come and worship - just no membership.
Seems reasonable to me that one should be denied membership in an official house of worship if one openly violates basic rules of morality and intends to keep doing so. Of course, in this case, we're not sure as those details aren't stated. But one can draw inferences.
Freepmail me if you want on/off this pinglist.
Wouldn't it depend on whether the person was openly and notoriously engaging in sinful, i.e., homosexual behavior? The act is sinful, the inclination is not.
Obviously those are not the only two alternatives. Love the sinner and hate the sin. All are called to repentance.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.