Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chevron rules out Unocal carve-up if Chinese defeated
MCN International ^ | 07 July 2005

Posted on 07/06/2005 10:50:06 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: hedgetrimmer
"One word: hegemon."

I thought "hegemon" was the nickname for that Jamaican gardener who used to trim my hedges and shrubs down in California. I guess that word has a second meaning...lol.

21 posted on 07/06/2005 1:58:49 PM PDT by carl in alaska (Hey John Kerry...we don't do this just for "entertainment.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: carl in alaska
I thought "hegemon" was the nickname for that Jamaican gardener who used to trim my hedges and shrubs down in California

Nah, it's a Japanese cartoon character.

22 posted on 07/06/2005 2:02:56 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

hegemony: the domination of one state over its allies


23 posted on 07/06/2005 2:52:28 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Thanks for the ping!


24 posted on 07/06/2005 7:42:56 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer; Willie Green
The fruits of "free trade".

Totally wrong. This is the fruits of a severely regulated capital market in china. Fact is goods can flow freely between the US and China , but capital can not. That is Chevron is not free to buy a chinese oil company while the reverse is true. Further distortions come from the US consumer spending themselves into oblivion while the chinese tend to save and invest for the future. This has nothing to do with free trade of goods and services.

25 posted on 07/06/2005 8:05:37 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
It doesn't really matter who owns the crude. The crude still flows on to the world market.

Correct analysis on the surface. Beneath the surface, the US is selling assets to spend today, while China is buying a future revenue stream. Guess who will be better off down the road. It will be the guys who bought a future revenue stream.

26 posted on 07/06/2005 8:09:09 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
Correct analysis on the surface. Beneath the surface, the US is selling assets to spend today, while China is buying a future revenue stream. Guess who will be better off down the road. It will be the guys who bought a future revenue stream.

Well, I see your point, but if in fact it turns out that this is the peak of the oil market, then the Chinese might live to regret this.

27 posted on 07/06/2005 9:44:03 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

If UNOCAl had any significant US oil supply, it would not be the object of a take over with crude oil at record prices.


28 posted on 07/06/2005 9:47:52 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

Unless their purpose for purchasing the company is geopolitical.


29 posted on 07/06/2005 10:57:15 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson