Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

School bench message said too religious
Marietta Daily Journal (MJD) online edition ^ | Wednesday, July 6, 2005 3:06 AM EDT | David Burch

Posted on 07/11/2005 11:13:58 AM PDT by Terriergal

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: Terriergal
"My biggest fear is that this is going to cost hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal cost that otherwise might go to education," he said.

Isn't this what the ACLU and others like them have hoped for all along, that Christians would just roll over and give up the fight? In fact, isn't that what terrorists everywhere hope for? Isn't that pretty much what Spain did a few months ago, and what many people in Britain and the USA are trying to convince us we should do?

C'mon people, if we don't do something soon, we don't stand a chance.

21 posted on 07/11/2005 12:01:24 PM PDT by Desert_Girl (teach Africa to fish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YankeeGirl

Agreed!


22 posted on 07/11/2005 12:01:55 PM PDT by DGray (http://nicanfhilidh.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: YankeeGirl
It certainly sounds like it is being made to look like it was placed there by some official act.

It has been there for several years, before the Socialist started their separation of church and state propaganda. The Constitution says no such thing, which is why we need strict Constitutionalists in the SC.

23 posted on 07/11/2005 12:03:25 PM PDT by concerned about politics ("A people without a heritage are easily persuaded (deceived)" - Karl Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: YankeeGirl

One can, however, argue the bench has historical significance, since the public schools were originally created so children could learn to read the Bible.


24 posted on 07/11/2005 12:03:30 PM PDT by Uncle Vlad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal

OH MY GOSH. This is right across the street from my house.

I bet you nobody but this one liberal wacko even blinked an eye at the bench. My kids will go to this high school. Grrr.

I better make sure my kids don't associate with this guy's....unless my son is spouting the latest thing he learned on Rush Limbaugh. Heeheehee


25 posted on 07/11/2005 12:06:43 PM PDT by Politicalmom (Just one more reason to hate the government....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

Don't worry. The article said his kids are still in elementary school (A.L Burruss, if I'm not mistaken.)


26 posted on 07/11/2005 12:08:07 PM PDT by DGray (http://nicanfhilidh.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: retrokitten

School board members do not "visit" buildings, as all of their meetings, at least for our schools, are held at the admin offices. And, board members are unpaid and elected positions, mostly held by local business owners.


27 posted on 07/11/2005 12:08:55 PM PDT by Cyclone59 (If you can read this thank a teacher... since it's in English, thank an American Soldier!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DGray

Yeah. MY children's school. Actually, I just realized we moved in to the street next door to these people three months ago.

*Sigh*


28 posted on 07/11/2005 12:10:22 PM PDT by Politicalmom (Just one more reason to hate the government....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
Oh, I see. You said your kids will go to MHS. I get it now. :D
29 posted on 07/11/2005 12:14:54 PM PDT by DGray (http://nicanfhilidh.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics

Let's face a fact here: the left doesn't bitch about these things because it's somehow a violation of a constitutional "wall of separation" (which doesn't exist, btw), but because they can't stand the idea of God.


30 posted on 07/11/2005 12:18:11 PM PDT by My2Cents (Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati [When all else fails, play dead])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
It has been there for several years, before the Socialist started their separation of church and state propaganda.

It's only been there a few years, not long enough to have any historical significance.

I thought the Framers wanted to separate church & state so there would be no appearance of a state sponsored denomination as in good old England. That bench smacks of a particular type of worship, and a particular way of relating to a deity.

Unlike most of our supreme court justices I don't see a constitutional issue in the 10 commandments in a legal setting. But "Jesus loves you" has nothing to do with education, it is a blatent and gratuitous religious message. I still say it has no place in a public school.

31 posted on 07/11/2005 12:24:56 PM PDT by YankeeGirl (Certa bonum certamen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics

"I'll bet if it said "Allah" or "Satan" loves you, this woman never would have said word."

You may be right, however I'd bet there would be a LOT of complaints from other parents/students/busybodies if the bench said "Satan loves you" and that bench would be long gone.


32 posted on 07/11/2005 12:32:15 PM PDT by Ignatius J Reilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: YankeeGirl
"That school is a PUBLIC school, NOT a religious school" With all due respect, it is a religious school, as it teaches evolution. evolution is indeed a religion weather the leftists want to admit it or not.
33 posted on 07/11/2005 12:41:59 PM PDT by Attredies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ignatius J Reilly
You may be right, however I'd bet there would be a LOT of complaints from other parents/students/busybodies if the bench said "Satan loves you" and that bench would be long gone.

You're right. It would be too left wing for ... everyone!!!!(as in more than one busy body)

34 posted on 07/11/2005 12:50:10 PM PDT by concerned about politics ("A people without a heritage are easily persuaded (deceived)" - Karl Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics

bump with no comment


35 posted on 07/11/2005 12:58:21 PM PDT by Ciexyz (Let us always remember, the Lord is in control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Terriergal

Tell 'em to sit on it.


36 posted on 07/11/2005 1:01:57 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Attredies
Don't tell me you are one of those fools who believes that the world began only a few thousand years ago.

Evolution is based on the scientific method, something that cannot be said about the Bible.

37 posted on 07/11/2005 1:02:19 PM PDT by Clemenza (Marry Me Rachael Ray!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Attredies

I don't consider myself to be a "leftist," but more of a republican-leaning conservative. I won't argue the point with you, but I will say I disagree with the statement that evolution is a religious belief.

I had a teacher in the 70s who would say, when class discussions got heated, "reasonable men can differ on this." Since it was an all girl hs, everyone would jump on him for being a sexist and then the tension in the room would disappear as everyone took a breath and relaxed.


38 posted on 07/11/2005 1:05:07 PM PDT by YankeeGirl (Certa bonum certamen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
Evolution is based on the scientific method, something that cannot be said about the Bible.

"Science" has animal fossils (DNA), and they have human fossils (DNA). The only connection they have is that they look similar, but appearances can be used to easily deceive people.

39 posted on 07/11/2005 1:16:05 PM PDT by concerned about politics ("A people without a heritage are easily persuaded (deceived)" - Karl Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

yep.


40 posted on 07/11/2005 1:23:31 PM PDT by Terriergal (What is the meaning of life?? Man's chief end is to glorify God and to enjoy him for ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson