Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evolutionary War (Conservatives and Evolution)
The New Republic ^ | 7/7/05 | Ben Adler

Posted on 07/12/2005 10:28:43 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-138 last
To: Gumlegs; longshadow
The girly-man scampered off, murmuring "Ooooo, you big meanie!" And that was it. Another thread wrapped up. But I knew there'd be more. That's how it goes in this business. So I wrapped my trench coat around me, bent my head into the chill wind, and headed for a nearby saloon.
121 posted on 07/14/2005 11:26:33 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. The List-O-Links is at my homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
At this forum we share information and seriously debate issues.

So why is it that when you're asked to support the premise that intelligent design is actually scientific and has a logical basis, you respond with nothing but snide comments?

There are some however, that just come here just to engage in arguing and have nothing much to offer.

You mean like people who respond to reasonable inquiries about the scientific validity of Intelligent Design with stupid retorts that in no way address the questions?

My past experience with you fall into that category. Have a nice evening.

Typical creationist. Ignore all questions, make snide comments, declare victory, run away like a coward.
122 posted on 07/14/2005 12:33:20 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio

Line by line soph debate tactics applied to my simple statement to you is such pathetic overkill.


123 posted on 07/14/2005 12:34:53 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
Line by line soph debate tactics applied to my simple statement to you is such pathetic overkill.

I've noticed that the only people who complain when someone responds to their entire statement are those who don't make defensible statements in the first place. Then they whine when their dishonesty and/or irrationality is exposed.
124 posted on 07/14/2005 12:37:36 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio

Looks like plain talk's responses are indeed pretty plain ... even pre-packaged in the case of the one you and I got.


125 posted on 07/14/2005 1:39:53 PM PDT by Gumlegs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
It has become obvious that some creationist/IDists are here not to debate but to taunt the pro evolution side and then when the bait is taken, to run off with as many 'parting' shots as possible.

What I find interesting is the almost complete lack of cites to primary or even secondary sources to back up their creationist crapola. Are they afraid that we might read the sources and find their interpretation either incomplete or outright wrong?
126 posted on 07/14/2005 1:41:19 PM PDT by b_sharp (Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: b_sharp
Whenever I feel prideful...all I need to do is come back to an evo thread and read everyone "self-exalting" themselves.
I go away with a new humbleness. Its quite helpful.
127 posted on 07/14/2005 2:02:28 PM PDT by wallcrawlr (http://www.bionicear.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: wallcrawlr
Are you trying to say that I misrepresented the creationist tactics?

All you need to do is retrace this thread and read the posts by PT to see his abandonment of discourse when asked to present a few specifics of his claims. Instead of presenting them he throws a red herring into the mix by complaining about the responses he gets and laces his own responses with useless ad homs.

If you question the general statement I made about creationists, just take a peek at a few 'evo' threads and you'll see a mass of unsubstantiated Creationist assertions with a very few backing cites thrown in for appearance sake.
128 posted on 07/14/2005 2:45:40 PM PDT by b_sharp (Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

Pride in humility placemarker


129 posted on 07/15/2005 12:05:30 AM PDT by Thatcherite (Conservative and Biblical Literalist are not synonymous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: b_sharp

Just as long as he goes away.


130 posted on 07/15/2005 12:47:09 PM PDT by balrog666 (A myth by any other name is still inane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: balrog666
"Just as long as he goes away."

If he can't or won't come up with a little more than ad hom, having any kind of discourse with him is a waste of time.

131 posted on 07/15/2005 5:29:44 PM PDT by b_sharp (Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

You wouldn't be sneered at if you had answered the questions. It seems that you don't want a discussion. It is evident that you are only trying to disrupt.


132 posted on 07/15/2005 8:56:58 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Gumlegs

'Snear enough to be accurate.


133 posted on 07/15/2005 8:58:49 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic

There were no questions worthy of discussion. Certain evo's just like to argue and argue with soph tactics and waste time. I have better things to do.


134 posted on 07/15/2005 9:21:15 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

OK, so you cannot even answer a simple question. VI=ON


135 posted on 07/15/2005 9:25:34 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Professor
I am an economic conservative. I would not have recommend all of W.J. Bryan's economic agenda (although some was pretty sound). God is able to protect and use and bless a nation that has some problems with its economics if that nation would honor Him and His word. God would grant such a nation very unusual wisdom to get it right. I would endorse a world full of Bryans before I would endorse the current A-spiritual, hedonistic, amoral, self-centered and self-indugent, God dis-honoring conservative economics that I see flaunted by so many of the more vulgar contributors to Free Republic. All of our most conservative economics, along with our free enterprise system will collapse under the judgement of God coming upon our sinful epicurian use of it. "Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people." Proverbs 14:34. I recommend that you read much more than Bryans economics. Read much of his lectures and speeches to young people. We have no statesman of that calibre today, that I know of, who are motivating young people to live such clean, upright, God-ward and generous lives.
136 posted on 07/16/2005 4:40:51 AM PDT by Free Baptist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

Comment #137 Removed by Moderator

To: Athanasius_ROCKS
The guy is a troll

Oh well. My response is still good :-)

138 posted on 07/16/2005 7:23:23 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-138 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson